06-30-2024, 04:54 AM
(06-29-2024, 08:19 PM)Karl12 Wrote: Reckon the usual intel agencies may well have him over a barrel mate and it's certainly not based on 'nothing'.
Just how much do you know about his early years (and handlers) and why are you so cocksure he is not an asset?
Seems like the usual classic theatrics to me and lo and behold the new ruling has now absolutely 'jeopardized the ability of journalists to report on military, intelligence or diplomatic information that officials deem secret.'.
Link
Really nice outcome for them whilst all the peons celebrate what they are told to celebrate.
What do you guys mean by asset?
What's that? A spy? Someone with connections?
I don't see why evidence Assagne was working for some intelligence
agencies of had been in their payroll.
Considering what he has been through and often close
to death after 14 years in the run and most of them imprisoned
one way or the other.
A really good day for democracy but a bad day for journalism.
Anyone can be arrested or persecuted for exposing
crimes, war crimes, and whatever wrongdoings you can name.
The accusations he is an 'asset' (whatever this means) have no basis
and Assagne has now been immortalised thanks to the US
and both the democrats and republicans.
