Dead or on the lamb? - Printable Version +- Deny Ignorance (https://denyignorance.com) +-- Forum: Current Events (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Current-Events) +--- Forum: Crime (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Crime) +--- Thread: Dead or on the lamb? (/Thread-Dead-or-on-the-lamb) |
RE: Dead or on the lamb? - ArMaP - 09-03-2024 (09-03-2024, 02:04 PM)FlyingClayDisk Wrote: One other thing I find strangely missing from the story. Vessels of this length, under charter, are required to carry life rafts equalling 150% of the maximum capacity of the boat. On this boat, this requirement would have meant multiple life rafts. Life rafts are mounted on deck in such a way that they automatically inflate when they become bouyant in water (there are also other things which will auto-inflate them, often things like the EPIRB going bouyant). Why were none of these deployed? The survivors were on one of the rafts, so at least one was deployed. If I'm not mistaken, only the cook was found dead outside the ship, the other bodies were found inside it. RE: Dead or on the lamb? - Encia22 - 09-04-2024 (09-03-2024, 12:49 PM)guyfriday Wrote: I'm wondering if any autopsy has been conducted at this point, and the whole thing will be blamed on the crew. This smells bad people, and the question is why. Ok, perhaps something is getting lost in translation in the various news feeds. Here, from our National Associated Press Agency (ANSA) which I found last night... Quote:There are no signs of trauma on the bodies of lawyer Chris Morvillo and his wife Neda, both of whom died in the Bayesian shipwreck off the coast of Porticello on August 19. Ok, so labratory tests still need to come in... (09-03-2024, 02:04 PM)FlyingClayDisk Wrote: First, I strongly doubt any sort of a waterspout or downdraft type event... Ok, I've been reading that they now believe it to have been a Downburst, rather than a waterspout. From: https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/news/tragic-sinking-of-superyacht-bayesian-italian-prosecutors-investigate-98886 Quote:Italian prosecutors said they believed that a downburst had hit the ship, contradicting early reports of a tornado or waterspout. In a downburst, air shoots down from the base of the cloud producing wind speeds of more than 100 mph (160km/h) before spreading out unpredictably on hitting the surface. Also, a slight correction to one of my earlier posts: It appears the Bayesian didn't have a true "Black Box", but an AIS transponder, equipped with GPS. So, all they can get from that are the movements of the ship before the equipment went dead. So, from an Australian news source, I found this description of the ships last moments... Quote:An AIS tracking system sends information from onboard boats to coastal stations, alerting officials to movement and distress. RE: Dead or on the lamb? - FlyingClayDisk - 09-04-2024 Quote:An AIS tracking system sends information from onboard boats to coastal stations, alerting officials to movement and distress. So, there's another 9 minutes on top of the 16 minutes for passengers to escape. A vessel shaking "violently" enough to pull the anchor free is a pretty notable event, and not something which would go unnoticed. Yet, everyone was seemingly happily asleep in their cabins??? I don't think so. Flooding in the engine room is going to set off multiple alarms all over the boat. What, no one heard any of these alarms? 358 meters of drift is nearly a quarter of a mile. The crew would have been alerted to this, if by nothing else the Anchor Drag alarm would have been going off, which would have mobilized the entire crew (if they were worth even one shit). An anchor drag alarm will go off if the boat moves more than 50 meters. This boat drifted 7x times that number. There's just WAY too many things wrong with this whole story! edit - The Bayesian weighed 543 tons. Even with a 1,000 mile per hour wind (which is impossible in nature), a 543 ton vessel doesn't drift a quarter of a mile in a matter of seconds. That much mass takes a while to get moving. Plus, given the vessel was at anchor, the winds would have initially turned the vessel into the wind, thus only the cross-section of the bow would have been exposed to the winds (i.e. the most streamlined portion of the vessel). Even after the vessel broke free from it's anchorage, it still would have been dragging anchor on the bottom, further slowing its drift. And, if the anchor somehow broke free from the vessel altogether, then something was seriously defective in the vessel itself or the anchor assembly. (I've hung up an anchor in a man-made reef one time (made of tires chained together) and damn near ripped the bow section of the boat out trying to free it. Wound up having to use the stern cleats, and even then I couldn't get it free, so had to cut the line and abandon the anchor). Anchors don't just magically come free from a vessel once set. Dragging anchor is common, but again, the anchor is still there dragging across the bottom. And despite all this maelstrom, beyond anything known to man...NO other vessels in the area were affected? C'mon!! Somebody wanted these people dead. RE: Dead or on the lamb? - guyfriday - 09-04-2024 (09-04-2024, 06:05 AM)FlyingClayDisk Wrote: So, there's another 9 minutes on top of the 16 minutes for passengers to escape. A vessel shaking "violently" enough to pull the anchor free is a pretty notable event, and not something which would go unnoticed. Yet, everyone was seemingly happily asleep in their cabins??? I don't think so. Flooding in the engine room is going to set off multiple alarms all over the boat. What, no one heard any of these alarms?That fact that the chef was the only member of the crew that died is really leaving credence to the idea that some of the passengers were either drugged or flat out poisoned. The more that comes out the more this appears to be a hit. RE: Dead or on the lamb? - FlyingClayDisk - 09-04-2024 When the shit hits the fan, twenty five minutes is a really, really, long time! RE: Dead or on the lamb? - l0st - 09-04-2024 (09-03-2024, 02:04 PM)FlyingClayDisk Wrote: I've held off saying anything up until now. Ironically enough, I've been on a ship myself for the past 2 weeks! LOL! Anyway... I completely agree with you. FWIW, I've been on a similarly sized yacht (although not a sailing yacht) called the Braveheart. Crew were very attentive and would have been on top of something like this immediately. There would have been warning that such a storm was coming in or on the horizon and the crew should have been ensuring that everything was secured at that time with an "all hands" call. You also have to keep in mind that these vessels are designed to float - even upside down. I also strongly doubt a waterspout by looking at the video. I will, however, disagree about it being a microburst. I think this can't be entirely ruled out. However, I personally don't think a single microburst could sink a ship of this size. The rogue wave theory crossed my mind, but we don't see that in the video, and for a ship this size, it would need to be a pretty damn large wave. Totally on board about there needing to be a giant hole somewhere for the ship to sink this quickly. And I also agree, definitely tractor trailer sized like perhaps a bomb went off. I'm still not clear on the design of the rear of this ship with the supposed flip down deck. I don't know if that's still open to the outside when its deployed or not. I would think there would be water-tight doors immediately behind that deck that would remain closed at all times when the deck is in use. I would assume with modern tech that these doors would very likely close automatically if water is detected. Absent some other hole in the hull, there would have been nowhere for the air to escape, and the yacht would have remained floating if capsized. It appears that this ship was specifically designed for this scenario as well. I don't believe the official story either, not to mention that the story keeps changing. RE: Dead or on the lamb? - ArMaP - 09-04-2024 (09-04-2024, 05:20 AM)Encia22 Wrote: Ok, so labratory tests still need to come in... In real life things take time, it's not like in CSI, where they have instant results for tests that take days. RE: Dead or on the lamb? - l0st - 09-04-2024 (09-04-2024, 05:20 AM)Encia22 Wrote: Ok, perhaps something is getting lost in translation in the various news feeds. Well, I don't know why, but replying with a quote isn't showing all the quoted comments and info, at least in the edit window. Anyways... don't you think its strange they're claiming "no evidence" of any physical issues with the bodies found aside from drowning. How does one get tossed from bed in a capsized yacht at 4am without sustaining any injuries? RE: Dead or on the lamb? - guyfriday - 09-04-2024 (09-04-2024, 02:28 PM)l0st Wrote: Well, I don't know why, but replying with a quote isn't showing all the quoted comments and info, at least in the edit window. Not to mention that point that was made about the furniture getting tossed around. How would a person know the difference between getting hit over the head and a loose chair getting flung around. Also remember the people were sound asleep while the boat shook around for 9 minutes and then flopped on its side and took 16 minutes to sink. Those people soundly slept during all that and only died due to drowning. This story is fishier than the boat now. RE: Dead or on the lamb? - ArMaP - 09-04-2024 (09-04-2024, 06:05 AM)FlyingClayDisk Wrote: So, there's another 9 minutes on top of the 16 minutes for passengers to escape. No, those 9 minutes are part of the 16 minutes (according to the AIS system). I found a site (in Italian) that has the timeline. Gli ultimi 16 minuti del Bayesian, la mappa del naufragio Quote:3:50 am: the waterspout and the swinging sailing ship (09-04-2024, 03:31 PM)guyfriday Wrote: Not to mention that point that was made about the furniture getting tossed around. How would a person know the difference between getting hit over the head and a loose chair getting flung around. The energy used is different, a loose chair does not keep the movement before hitting because it doesn't have enough energy, when hitting someone on purpose with something (even a chair), the energy used is bigger and the movement of the chair is done in a way to make it go through the head. I'm sure an experienced doctor would know the difference. |