226 |
2,890 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

The Agenda: Their Vision | Your Future is a feature-length independent documentary produced by Mark Sharman; former UK broadcasting executive at ITV and Sky (formerly BSkyB).
Already living this life " Their Vision | Your Future"
In fiction and fact, there have always been people and organisations with ambitions to control the world. And now the oligarchs who pull the strings of finance and power finally have the tools to achieve their global objectives; omnipresent surveillance, artificial intelligence, digital currency and ultimately digital identities. The potential for social control of our lives and minds is alarmingly real.
I live under omnipresent surveillance already idk about you. The rest is basically dark age fears. "potential for " is just ignorance and they are doing what they complain about
The plan has been decades in the making and has seen infiltration of Governments, local councils, big business, civil society, the media and, crucially, education. A ceaseless push for a new reality, echoing Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, or George Orwell’s 1984.
That's just more mind fuckery
The Agenda: Their Vision, Your Future examines the digital prison which awaits us if we do not push back right now. How your food, energy, money, travel and even your access to the internet could be limited and controlled; how financial power is strangling democracy and how global institutions like the World Health Organisation are commandeered to champion ideological and fiscal objectives.
More stupid shit, all of that is reality already
The centrepiece is man-made climate change and with it, the race to Net Zero. Both are encapsulated in the United Nations and its Agenda 2030. A force for good? Or “a blank cheque for totalitarian global control ?
Everyone knows that's nonsense, the date is not even remotely realistic
45 |
1,738 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-10-2025, 03:12 AM)andy06shake Wrote: The kicker is that we live in a world where everything and everyone are already connected and intertwined in ways that cannot easily be pulled apart without it all collapsing around us.
The fact of the matter is that we should come together as a species.
The alternative being to continue to fight silly petty wars over ever-decreasing resources and religious ideologies, until there is nothing left standing and no quality of life remains.
If we continue on the path of division and exploitation, we jeopardize not just our quality of life but the very survival of our species.
But we need come together for the correct reasons as opposed to the bankers and 1%ers wet dream of control.
Unity should be rooted in compassion and sustainability, not dictated by elite interests.
Perfectly said.
Selfishly, I am glad I live in a place that is so small, there is nothing for the looters to steal, and we are strategically worthless. I have often wondered if humanity deserves to persevere. If not for all the music and books and art and philosophy, I might think our influence on the Earth was not worthy.
"Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about. Be kind. Always". - Darielys Tejera/Spc. Douglas Jay Green/Robin Williams
"Pseudoscience, depending for its “truth” on consensus, is deeply hostile to challenge." - Rael Jean Isaac
45 |
1,738 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-07-2025, 10:15 AM)GENERAL EYES Wrote: My parents worked with computers, my husband works with computers, I'm pretty tech illiterate and am so proud I managed to disable and delete all the unwanted games and computer apps that came preinstalled with my new phone. I'd rather hike a trail to see a sunset than stare at a screen all day, but I'm housebound, so I stare at a screen all day.
When it comes to things like Digital ID and economic matters, I hope for the best, but knowing human greed and human nature, I'm extremely hesitant that it will be all roses, sunshine and puppies in the future.
Hope I'm wrong.
This is completely off-topic, but I think you need it.
I think I might join you on walks now and then, if it's okay with you.
"Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about. Be kind. Always". - Darielys Tejera/Spc. Douglas Jay Green/Robin Williams
"Pseudoscience, depending for its “truth” on consensus, is deeply hostile to challenge." - Rael Jean Isaac
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

You know,
We're not a large community.
I role play (in my head) all the time... and I followed this trail of fantasy:
Adversarius: And I might suggest that being a 'community' might be a mistake.
Sophistus: That's absurd! It's a natural imperative to come together and be human "together." It cannot be outside the human experience and remain "human."
Adversarius: But we are being attacked, and it is working because we are a community. This never would have worked without separate communities cramming into one avenue of discussion... theirs.
They are "culling" us by rendering us as if "hiding in plain sight."
There, but not really.
Certainly not effectively enough to function "as a community."
All the ways communities have expressed agency have been allowed to be subsumed by anything but the community's voice.
The community is somehow to embrace a "party-sourced" solution (that now have the distinction of being opposed because it was their idea.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can project Sophistus' response... I know you can.
Anyway... just a thought, humbly submitted from the peanut gallery of 'me.'
We discuss biases that kill.... In a secular word... the mother of them all is political.
And these poor people conned into standing under the spotlight... They won't change a thing. (Technically, they are oath-bound not to attack their own. (?) - a rumor I heard...)
(I know.... oaths...  )
1 |
76 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-08-2025, 09:34 PM)argentus Wrote: I have often wondered if humanity deserves to persevere. If not for all the music and books and art and philosophy, I might think our influence on the Earth was not worthy.
Paraphrased: "Of all the creatures on Earth, man is the only one who recognises there is a God. And the only one who lives as though he does not exist"
Hunter S Thompson
6 |
394 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

10-09-2025, 08:33 AM
This post was last modified: 10-09-2025, 08:33 AM by SurferSoul. 
(10-08-2025, 09:28 PM)Sirius Wrote: The centrepiece is man-made climate change and with it, the race to Net Zero. Both are encapsulated in the United Nations and its Agenda 2030. A force for good? Or “a blank cheque for totalitarian global control ?
Everyone knows that's nonsense, the date is not even remotely realistic
Unless you’re not being sarcastic, the original date of agenda 2030 was agenda 2021. I suppose that date wasn’t realistic hence the date change. But just look how quickly they flipped the switch in 2020 and through to 2022, during the covid years. All that’s needed is a big enough problem, real or imaginary, so as to implement problem, reaction, solution.
All they need to do is to convince people their lives are in danger if they don’t go along with the “solution” and that is enough to change behaviour entirely. For many climate change is already an existential threat. Just ramp it up a bit and agenda 2030 becomes reality in 2030.
3 |
629 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-14-2024, 05:09 AM)Karl12 Wrote: As well as other institutions like Brookings, Aspen, Atlantic etc. wasn't really that surprised to learn that the World Economic Forum is also 'saturated' by members of the Trilateral Commission and when it comes to politicians, apparently "it didn't matter if you were Democratic or Republican in America, the Trilateral Commission always had their men in the system".
[Video: https://youtu.be/SYNs7rDzim8]
Apparently the T.C. is just an offshoot of the 'Council on Foreign Relations' which has also been a huge player for recruitment into the global technocratic dictatorship and 'since the 1950s the Rockefeller interests have taken the major role in directing Council affairs'.
There's a really relevant slideshow in the video below showing how virtually all members of recent, successive U.S. administrations have been members of it.
See 45:45
Know many folks here will already be aware of this info but also important to note that the same family involved with the founding of the T.C. was also the same family involved with the funding of the Nazi war machine and exporting the pseudoscience of eugenics to Hitler.
[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]
I was going to state what you said in the opening statement of your post. Until I read it and chuckled that others already are aware of this. But I have to say, there are so many people that do not comprehend this and blame the other side. Notice Trump is praising AI which is actually derived off of the programmers beliefs that could be bias. The people approving the info being allowed reflects in the bias of AI. Beliefs of people are what feeds the AI so it can be bias based on those beliefs. If they fed the whole truth to AI it would have a psychlogical breakdown. How do you feed zoloft or prozac to a computer?
1 |
76 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Does Yuval Harari, founder of Sapienship, a multidisciplinary organization advocating for global responsibility whose mission is to clarify public perception, have all the answers?
He does know how easy it is to hide everything out in the open. Not long ago and before all the mainstream output about AI, he identified developing tech would mean less need for human workers and asked 'what will we do with the new underclass?' Nothing, you interfering bastard.
I say, set all these international, extranational, NGO conglomerates against eachother. Keep them busy fighting it out for top-dog spot and totally ignore anything not instinctively resonant with our own perceptions. Even though I do get it, too many people are completely unaware how fully indoctrinated they are. To the point their instincts and perceptions are twisted beyond all reason.
215 |
2,573 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-09-2025, 07:46 PM)covent Wrote: Even though I do get it, too many people are completely unaware how fully indoctrinated they are. To the point their instincts and perceptions are twisted beyond all reason.
Yes mate remember certain people on ATS years ago scoffing at the very idea of a digitised control grid but just look at what's in the post these days.
Video 1 / 2
Anyway thought a very good point was made in this very short vid asking the question 'how do you get people to fund their own panopticon?'
Don't know how long this new article will remain up so have posted it in it's entirety.
Quote:‘On the Backs of Digital Slaves’: Musk, Other Trump-Era Tech Elites Building Global Digital Control Grid
Technocracy News founder Patrick Wood explained how key figures in the Trump administration are developing a system for total digital control over global society. Wood’s presentation was one of four at the recent Omniwar Symposium that analyzed the dangers of technocracy.
Top figures in the Trump administration are rolling out policies that promote a technocratic system of global digital control, according to Technocracy News founder Patrick Wood.
“Technocracy has always had the domination of man in mind,” Wood said in his presentation this month at the Omniwar Symposium, which aired on CHD.TV.
The technocratic project, developed in the early 1930s and adopted by behind-the-scenes oligarchs, envisions a society controlled by elite technical experts who advocate for social engineering, the abolition of private property and scientific dictatorship, Wood said.
Today, the project is expanding. “For the first time in history, technocracy has been wrapped in a political ideology and a religious system as well. And now it seeks to escape the boundaries of the United States,” said Wood, author of “Technocracy Rising.”
“In other words, the new and expanded goal of technocracy is to build an empire throughout the world using AI [artificial intelligence] and crypto blockchain technology as weapons of mass subjugation,” he added.
Architects of U.S. effort working to take over all data, Wood says
Early promoters of the technocratic project detailed how the elite could completely replace the political system, partly by continuously monitoring and controlling all production and consumption.
That process is ongoing today, Wood said.
Wood said it’s important to name the architects of today’s technocracy movement. They included Elon Musk, Palantir founder Peter Thiel, President Donald Trump’s AI and crypto czar David Sachs, JD Vance’s mentor Curtis Yarvin, Marc Andreessen, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Michael Kratsios, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison.
Wood showed a video of Ellison, who explained that countries at the forefront of the “digital revolution” can best leverage the AI models his company and others have built by “unifying all of their data,” so that AI can use it. That includes “all of your healthcare data,” including electronic health records, diagnostic data and genomic data, Ellison said.
Combining all health data with all financial records and any other available societal information about individuals would revolutionize how government works, Ellison said in the video.
Wood noted that Ellison has also said this includes geospatial data — capturing “where you go, where you move and who you’re associated with.”
DOGE seized large datasets from every government agency
The administration took a key step toward technocracy when Trump signed the Genius Act and several other executive orders, Wood said. These measures created a privatized financial system based on crypto and tokens, operating outside the Federal Reserve and enabling forms of speculation that Fed oversight would normally prevent.
All of the government data “freed by DOGE” — the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency — was added to the AI cloud, Wood said. In addition, Palantir won a $10 billion government and military contract to combine that data in its AI systems.
Wood said Trump, Musk and Lutnick designed the DOGE project as a “shock and awe” operation, seizing large datasets from every government agency and deploying AI to perform tasks previously handled by humans.
The strategy was to take over all of the data, Wood said. “It was never revealed to the public that way. But now we know exactly what’s happened.”
Building an empire ‘on the backs of digital slaves’
The federal government owns an unknown quantity of gold and 680 million acres of land — with valuable minerals and other productive resources — meant to be kept in trust for the American people, Wood said.
He said the technocrats’ goal is to move from a debt-based economic system to an asset-based economic system.
Wood presented several videos in which Lutnick explained his plan to digitize and monetize the U.S. material assets for profit, using the new financial tools provided by the Genius Act.
Kratsios, Sachs and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio authored “America’s AI Action Plan,” which Wood said is a blueprint for using AI to expand the American empire throughout the world.
“You’ll see the idea of exporting all of this stuff to the world is to maintain control over it,” Wood said.
The goal is for the U.S. to export “its full AI technology stack — hardware, models, software, applications and standards — to all countries willing to join America’s AI alliance.”
Wood said that includes the data centers being built across the U.S., all of the AI models, the software that runs them, the applications and the rules for how those things will be run.
Link
Cheers.
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Had a thought just now that "economic modelling" is really control-grid design. It reduces human activity to a simplified model based on possible actions, with definite measurements, and metrics to solve for to for "optimal performance". Just flip the directionality on the model, and prediction becomes enforcement. So market capitalism and its search for "efficiency" is really a distributed design project; they've not only outsourced the funding for the implementation, as you mention Karl, but they've outsourced the design as well.
|