(06-26-2025, 03:36 PM)Karl12 Wrote: [...]

Nice one mate and enjoy your coffee - regarding this quote and 'penetration of zee cabinets' (as Klaus likes to say)..

[...]

Thanks, its appreciated.

Well, after rereading the thread, I can't help but feel like I came out as an unintentional troll, basically saying I'm just half listening to your answers, hence why the least I can do is to actually absorb the videos in your replies. Haven't watched all of them at the moment of writing this, but did start (while drinking my coffee, of course).

I want to come back on 'war'. Actually, I think its been a long time since war has been used as a 'damage control management' of a population. I wouldn't be surprise to learn that kingdoms during the Middle-Age, or even civilizations as early as the Antiquity would have 'plotted' or had agreements with another nation to wage war.

Like when you predict a famine because of population's growth with limited resources, then you start a war. Not only can you manage who goes and die (sending males mostly, while keeping the minimum), you can also implement social reforms and enactements to further several goals, whatever they are. The point here is that a famine would kill men, women and children, which is dangerous for a given population.

With a ration of 5 women for 1 man, the population can survive, despite the risk of lesser genetics variation for some time. On the opposite, the population has far greater risk of extinction with a ratio of 5 men for 1 women, for obvious reasons. So in this regards, it makes sense to orchestrate wars with neighborhood's nations when you expect a decline in your population from a social crisis like famine, thus 'damage control management'.

However, I'm still left with the idea that this behavior to start war to control population's growth might be by design to whatever species that manage to climb on top of the chain food of their environments.

Furthermore, I'm not entirely sure of the relevancy of such reasons in nowadays context. Especially in the current Middle-East case. It seems more probable to be about shifting control of resources (both economics and ecologics), and/or individuals within the higher hierarchical spheres. I still think PHC's specific mention of Israel and USA as blooming biodigital actors in their December 2024 report (6 months earlier to now) and the current way USA took Israel's side seems a bit more than a simple coincidence.

I think we might be wise to look at Isreal and Iran's economical dynamic from the begining 2025 at least, up to now and where it goes. It may gives clues about the general intentions or ambitions in this particular case.

Cheers!

(06-29-2025, 10:04 AM)IgnorantGod Wrote: Well, after rereading the thread, I can't help but feel like I came out as an unintentional troll, basically saying I'm just half listening to your answers, hence why the least I can do is to actually absorb the videos in your replies. Haven't watched all of them at the moment of writing this, but did start (while drinking my coffee, of course).

Not at all mate and input by you (and everyone else) is certainly appreciated - never got round to replying to your first post about collective archetypes in Nazi Germany but did find it notable that the first thing Hitler did was to get everyone a radio.

Flip to nowadays and this warning from Huxley on folks sleepwalking into 'tyrannical dictatorships' and being 'caught by surprise by their own advancing technology' sounds rather prescient.










Also notable that some of the exact same corporations involved in the horror show of the 'third reich' are now involved in the great reset's 'fourth (reich?) industrial revolution' but fair to say there's been quite a few acquisitions and mergers since then.

Obviously loads of speculation about 'food tyranny' and as Bayer were the main component of Nazi I.G.Farben (and were 'joined at the hip' with the Rockefellers during WW2) probably not the best news that they're taking increasing control over the world's food supply.

How the Rockefellers envision things doesn't sound good either and plans taken from their 'reset the table' report involve disrupting global supply chains, defunding farmers etc.


VIDEO:

Rockefeller's "Reset the Table:" Food Tyranny & Transform Food Supply


One just has to look at Mao's antics in China to see how 'effective' forced starvation can actually be (40 million dead) although according to David Rockefeller Mao's experiment was 'one of the most important and successful in human history' (link).

Cheers.

(06-29-2025, 10:04 AM)IgnorantGod Wrote: I want to come back on 'war'.

Yes plenty of potential distractions from global stage actors in the war theatre but from what I can see we should be equally concerned about the BIS war on 'all' humanity and some of the most disturbing things I've read come from actual military intelligence literature, founding documents, meeting minutes, official documentation etc

Apparently active 'cognitive warfare' is being waged on literally everyone and when it comes to ushering in the transhumanist 'I.T. Bio-Nano' era they are openly discussing some extremely disturbing shit.


Short Video: One / Two


Apparently all this has been in the pipeline ages and you can trace back hacking the 'golem' (us) to at least the late 1940's with the TEP sociopaths at MIT.

Cheers.

(07-03-2025, 05:22 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Not at all mate and input by you (and everyone else) is certainly appreciated - never got round to replying to your first post about collective archetypes in Nazi Germany but did find it notable that the first thing Hitler did was to get everyone a radio.

Flip to nowadays and this warning from Huxley on folks sleepwalking into 'tyrannical dictatorships' and being 'caught by surprise by their own advancing technology' sounds rather prescient.

That part is really important I'd think. Seems to be the general pattern of technological accessibility to the general public.

First military develops the technology, test its capacity and its potential weaponization. When enough test has been performed, and either prototypes or products are build, they start to publish the science and basic functionality of the technology.

Then, the public slowly gets access to it. The optimization phase of the technology starts, such as decreasing cost of production, miniaturization, etc. and more people are able to afford one. Looking at mobile phone, they could definitely start to broadcast some signals, and most of the developed world would be caught in it.

Hux was certainly fascinating, though I've only read his "The Doors of Perception". Should definitely get my hand on more of his works some day.

Cheers!

(07-03-2025, 07:02 AM)IgnorantGod Wrote: Seems to be the general pattern of technological accessibility to the general public.

First military develops the technology, test its capacity and its potential weaponization. When enough test has been performed, and either prototypes or products are build, they start to publish the science and basic functionality of the technology.

Then, the public slowly gets access to it. The optimization phase of the technology starts, such as decreasing cost of production, miniaturization, etc. and more people are able to afford one. Looking at mobile phone, they could definitely start to broadcast some signals, and most of the developed world would be caught in it.

Beautifully put mate and that's exactly the way I would do it.

Might sound cynical but maybe folks need to swap the prefix 'smart' to 'slave'.

Have heard the smartphone being described as 'the most sophisticated surveillance device ever invented' and would imagine implants will be fashionable soon (if they're not already).

As for other tech did you catch NATO/DARPA's nano-machine human brain interface which interacts with external AI? Talk about weaponized injectables lol.

Regarding who's running the game with Silicon Valley based military intel agencies and inter-generational central banksters then really can't find much more past the BIS.

Certainly not the biggest fan of Tucker but this guest did spill the beans a few weeks ago.







Cheers.

(07-03-2025, 07:40 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Might sound cynical but maybe folks need to swap the prefix 'smart' to 'slave'.

Have heard the smartphone being described as 'the most sophisticated surveillance device ever invented' and would imagine implants will be fashionable soon (if they're not already).

As for other tech did you catch NATO/DARPA's nano-machine human brain interface which interacts with external AI? Talk about weaponized injectables lol.

Nah, I think it has an accurate tone.

I haven't catch the nano-machine part, though it doesn't surprise me. I know nano-technology goes back to at least late 2000s IIRC. As a sidenote, I wonder if the next 'mythos wave' (UFO waves in the second half 1900s) will be AI and 'machine intelligence' communicating with people, and prompting them to 'merge' with it. You know, techno-singularity style?

Anyway, technological advances, as history suggests (well, the one written by winners that is), is mainly driven by conflicts. More specifically, fear and urgency tend to have the highest effect on the 'need' to develop. So basically, the rich boys (BIS and ilks) use climate changes, pandemics and WWIII to make countries fund their respective tech boys in order to create our successors; the biotech boys.

Then, in order to prevent population's uprising, and thus foiling the successor's narative, the rich boys decided to use the amalgame of techniques elaborated by the space boys throughout the 1900s up until now to keep the distraction going (with the help of the party boys - e.g. entertainment industries). Using technology to bombard people with information and emotion 24/7.

Do we start a boys band yet? I vote for tinfoil hat boys.

Cheers!

hav

(07-03-2025, 08:16 AM)IgnorantGod Wrote: Do we start a boys band yet? I vote for tinfoil hat boys.

Sign me up mate and I salute your very insightful post lol.

Amazing that propagandist Bernays was bragging about 'the party boys' almost 100 years ago yet certain people are still falling for it (also probably just coincidence that his nephew co-founded Netflix).

Quote:• "Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government."

Propagandist Edward Bernays.

E-Book: 'Propaganda' (1928)

Bernays and Bilderberg Steering Committee are under discussion in this clip and would wager the upcoming attempts at perception management are going to be literally off the charts.










Regarding the 'rich boys' don't know if you saw that short clip from the first post but apparently certain families have seen their 'current opportunity' (for long term reduction of humans) and used a Tavistock psychoanalyst to bullshit everyone.







Cheers.

(07-04-2025, 02:02 AM)Karl12 Wrote: hav

Sign me up mate and I salute your very insightful post lol.

Amazing that propagandist Bernays was bragging about 'the party boys' almost 100 years ago yet certain people are still falling for it (also probably just coincidence that his nephew co-founded Netflix).

[...]

Bernays and Bilderberg Steering Committee are under discussion in this clip and would wager the upcoming attempts at perception management are going to be literally off the charts.

[...]

I'm on it! I'm changing the vote for Tinfoil Hat Conspirationist boys - AKA - THC boys. Looks like stoner, acts like paranoid distrusters!

More on point, I found insightful the guy in the first video when he speculates about increasing confusion within the population and then AI comes to help. Yeah, seems to be partly unfolding as such in my opinion. I say partly because I think these chatbots are still more in data collection and pattern finding mode than manipulation or influencing mode.

Great comment about Netflix there Karl12! Its always family business, or so it seems.

On an additional note in regards to technological signal broadcasting, I know I've already posted that same link in two other threads, though I believe it is on point with the current discussion : Potential production of Hughlings Jackson's “parasitic consciousness” by physiologically-patterned weak transcerebral magnetic fields: QEEG and source localization

Quite interesting the fact that a familiar name figures amongst the researchers. Isn't he part of the space boys?

(07-04-2025, 07:26 AM)IgnorantGod Wrote: I'm on it! I'm changing the vote for Tinfoil Hat Conspirationist boys - AKA - THC boys.

Very nice mate - this could be our new sign.

We will of course need sufficient EMF deflection so only the best quality hats lol.


EMF Weapons Mind Control


Some relevant info in there on Persinger's work (as mentioned in your paper) and Delgado's creepy non-consensual 'experiments' on female psychiatric patients - according to his MKUltra hearing testimony 'man does not have the right to develop his own mind' (quote) - what a joker.

(07-04-2025, 07:26 AM)IgnorantGod Wrote: More on point, I found insightful the guy in the first video when he speculates about increasing confusion within the population and then AI comes to help.

Yes another 'saviour complex' archetype right there - let's hope it doesn't go postal and end up operating Fabian death panels out of gov-corp technates.

There's a relevant historical timeline below leading to where we find ourselves today and considering those involved it doesn't sound good.

And to think certain.people still scoff about the very idea of a totalitarian NWO dictatorship.




From 4:10






Well worth a watch I thought and the internet shills operating out of the WEF 'global shapers' cult also gets a mention.

Cheers.

(07-04-2025, 07:26 AM)IgnorantGod Wrote: Great comment about Netflix there Karl12! Its always family business, or so it seems.

Yes mate lots of curious family connections out there (some being rather 'literal' in eugenicist circles) - many are also members of the same groups like S+B whose initiation rituals do sound rather depraved (audio).

Following on from the findings of Dodd's congressional investigation the three families mentioned below appear to be instrumental but plenty of others keeping a low profile like the Bauers, Warburgs, Harrimans, Forresters, Walkers, Astors, Morgans, Dupont etc.

Quote:With funding provided mainly by the Carnegie Corporation, the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, today the Council has some 5,000 members, and some of them have been key officials in many US administrations. It has influence with the CIA and the American armed forces as well, and can count on Bill Clinton and George W. Bush as its backers.

Together, the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission have a degree of influence that is truly alarming. Collectively, they have the ability to subvert democracy and bypass elected representatives.

The usual suspects including.Fabian eugenicists, Bilderberg attendees etc are also heavily involved in this very old group (funded by Carnegie) and are still operating out of the U.N. today.

Apparently when it comes to appointed potentates and absolute global control they want 8 'zone directors ' and 51 'regional directors'.







Cheers.