12-16-2024, 09:44 PM
(12-15-2024, 07:54 PM)xuenchen Wrote: What medical evidence would prove the method of intake would make no difference?
Vaxes are injected directly into the bloodstream vs food is ingested and digested.
There may be a significant difference that can cause side effects.
false equivalencies don't solve the problem.
No vaccines are injected into the bloodstream. You'd know it if they were, because a tech would have to put a tourniquet around your arm (to stop the blood from flowing so they can find the vein) and then stick in a port (like when they draw blood from you) and then give the shot. Occasionally you can give vaccines straight to the nose (only a few can be delivered this way), but that's fairly rare and the "intake" is through the mucus membranes in your nose.
Also, if you dumped a vaccine into your stomach, the amount would be so tiny that your body wouldn't get any of it... and it might be turned into something else when it hits the acid in your stomach (wouldn't do much; the actual amount of fluid delivered in a vaccine is between .5 ml and 2 ml (depends on vaccine and whether it's for adult or child)... so that's the size of about 4 drops of water to 16 drops of water.)
