Which Bible Do You Trust, and Why?

[Roma]

It's all how you word it, lol:
[align=start]
AI Overview[/align]
[align=start]The "Great Flood" can refer to different events, such as the biblical story of Noah, which some calculate occurred around 2348 BC. Alternatively, it could refer to the Great Mississippi Flood of 1993, which lasted from June to October, or the Great California Flood of 1862, which happened from December 1861 to January 1862. Other significant "great floods" include the Great Miami River flood of 1913 and the Great Ohio River flood of 1937. Biblical Great Flood

• Geological perspective: Some scientists propose that the biblical flood story may be based on a catastrophic event in the Black Sea region around 7,500 years ago, when the sea was filled by the Mediterranean Sea bursting through a natural dam at the Bosporus. 
  

• Biblical timeline: According to a calculation based on the biblical book of Genesis, the flood occurred approximately 1656 years after the creation of Adam, placing the event around 2348 BC. 
  

[/align]

[FlyersFan]

Oh no we pulled her string...

  Hey .. I was told to recreate it ... 70 or 80 pages ... 

I think that's enough for now.   
I made my point.  

[Roma]

Oh no we pulled her string...

Sorry guys, I need to tap out for a bit.  Please carry on...

[FlyersFan]

It's all how you word it, lol:

No... there is only one 'noahs flood'.
And when asking about it, that's how it's addressed.
Don't be disingenuous.  

[quintessentone]

An NGO site?  LMAO, whatever you say.

I did a quick search and found these which contradict your findings:

https://www.foxnews.com/travel/researche...ns-country

Oh, and Google also says this:  

People also ask 
What evidence is there that the Bible is true?  

3) Historical documents and archeology confirm the Bible is accurate. Not only does the Bible include truthful spiritual content, but also it records historical and geographical details with remarkable accuracy. Archaeological evidence is consistently being found.

The FACT is that there is more proof that it actually happened than not.  

Edit:  Removed the rest because I don't feel like arguing with an atheist in a Bible thread.  Apologies.

They will be doing more research on this site next year...

"Though no excavations are planned this year, Jones told Fox News Digital the analysis of the site will continue, with additional geophysical surveys and possible core drilling slated for next year."We are focused on more non-destructive techniques to understand what's below the ground and more soil analysis as well," Jones said."

If nothing else, the core samples may prove there was a flood at some period in time in that area, which may or may not have been the resting place of the true or fabled boat.

As for Noah existing, well while I was researching the Ethiopian Bible and it's history, it appears that many sources expand on the idea that Noah and his offspring did, in fact, exist and there are genealogy charts and countless sources relating to Noah and his family tree. If this is just a story, it's one hellofa story that is entangled throughout many different peoples' scripture.

Who were the Cushites? | GotQuestions.org

[FlyersFan]

Sorry guys, I need to tap out for a bit.  Please carry on...

Brain hurting from the sudden influx of information?  

Here ya' go ... a little more to exorcise that gray matter ...

CSUN.EDU 21 Reasons Noahs Flood Didn't Happen

All sorts of great scientific fact information on rocks and fossils that you can address.
After you address the previous pages information of course. 
Good luck.  

[FlyersFan]

 If this is just a story, it's one hellofa story ...

It's just a story ... started out as a fictional pagan one and got readapted to different cultures in different places.   But retelling and reworking a fictional story doesn't make it true.  It just makes it popular.   

The irrefutable science proves the Noahs story is false.   For example ... the ice shelves exist ... and they predate the supposed Noahs flood ... and they wouldn't exist if the flood had happened .... they would have been destroyed.

[quintessentone]

It's just a story ... started out as a fictional pagan one and got readapted to different cultures in different places.   But retelling and reworking a fictional story doesn't make it true.  It just makes it popular.   

The irrefutable science proves the Noahs story is false.   For example ... the ice shelves exist ... and they predate the supposed Noahs flood ... and they wouldn't exist if the flood had happened .... they would have been destroyed.

I am not arguing whether or not Noahs flood story is true or not - that would be a monumental thing to prove either way and I already did this on a thread on ATS - so not revisiting it again. Well maybe if Roma's archaeological sources core samples next year come up with findings that may point to a large multi-roomed boat within an area that was flooded, then, I might do.

I do however believe that Noah and his offspring may have existed, because the genealogy sources and peoples' scriptures referencing this family line is way too detailed for it not to be.

[FlyersFan]

I do however believe that Noah and his offspring may have existed, because the genealogy sources and peoples' scriptures referencing this family line is way too detailed for it not to be.

A detailed popular fictional story is still fiction.   

Example - 'Muhammads flight' is a detailed popular fictional story that has been believed by billions and retold over the centuries ... but the popularity and detail don't mean that it's true.

[quintessentone]

A detailed popular fictional story is still fiction.   

Example - 'Muhammads flight' is a detailed popular fictional story that has been believed by billions and retold over the centuries ... but the popularity and detail don't mean that it's true.

Again, proof to the contrary is a monumental endeavour and each detail in each source must be debunked.