12-03-2024, 09:35 AM
This post was last modified 12-03-2024, 09:37 AM by Maxmars. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: grammar
 
It occurs to me that one of the most significant indicators of 'government representative' bullshit in the media can be summarized as their 'freedom' to cite the word "misinformation" as if they could ever be trusted, or had ever been appointed, to be the one's to identify what "misinformation" is.
Whenever a talking head on the media uses the word misinformation... you can be assured they are desperately trying to "control" the narrative... using the word "misinformation" the way a 1950's broadcaster would use the word "red communist."
It's supposed to stop the public from thinking....
Here's just one short video that demonstrates how the word 'absolves' the government spokesperson from having to address FEMA's absence at the scene of a crisis... because "misinformation" makes things 'way too hard."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl3fPAQIzzY
Personally, I would like to see a law in place that whenever a government official evokes the idea of misinformation, they become legally responsible for specificity in explaining just what exactly is the "offending" information - and how it's a lie... and exactly "who" is the source of it... enough with the 'misinformation' boogeyman!
Whenever a talking head on the media uses the word misinformation... you can be assured they are desperately trying to "control" the narrative... using the word "misinformation" the way a 1950's broadcaster would use the word "red communist."
It's supposed to stop the public from thinking....
Here's just one short video that demonstrates how the word 'absolves' the government spokesperson from having to address FEMA's absence at the scene of a crisis... because "misinformation" makes things 'way too hard."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl3fPAQIzzY
Personally, I would like to see a law in place that whenever a government official evokes the idea of misinformation, they become legally responsible for specificity in explaining just what exactly is the "offending" information - and how it's a lie... and exactly "who" is the source of it... enough with the 'misinformation' boogeyman!