US withdraws from the WHO

[sahgwa]

These organisations can look pretty and perfect on paper, oh look we stopped cholera and helped stop TB.  
But when you look at their real world physical and psychological impact during and after COVID, and all of the sterilisations with their vaccinations (oops) as well as the nefarious people backing them like Gates et al. I think it's better safe than sorry, staying out of this globalist organisation. 
Guess I am just a right wing backwoods Nazi yokel racist or something.

[quintessentone]

What with declining populations/birth rates throughout the world, it's a dangerous game playing around with people's health decisions and leading people to dismiss empirical science.

Global infant mortality rates with and without vaccines 1974 to 2024:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infan...y-vaccines

[FlyersFan]

I think it's better safe than sorry, staying out of this globalist organisation. 

AGREED!

WHO ... corrupt to the core.   Carrying water for the communist Chinese.   Covered for them saying that COVID was natural and that China had it under control.   We pay hundreds of millions of our tax dollars into this every year, and what we get back is nothing.    Our American money would be better spent on Americans ... 1/5 of kids in the USA go to bed hungry at night and the elderly are the biggest group of new homeless in the country.   Help ourselves with our money ... not a corrupt NWO globalist cesspool.

[sahgwa]

What with declining populations/birth rates throughout the world, it's a dangerous game playing around with people's health decisions and leading people to dismiss empirical science.

Global infant mortality rates with and without vaccines 1974 to 2024:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infan...y-vaccines

There you go painting everyone with a broad brush again - being anti WHO is not being anti science. As much as the MSM wants to paint it that way.

[quintessentone]

There you go painting everyone with a broad brush again - being anti WHO is not being anti science. As much as the MSM wants to paint it that way.

I am looking at the declining child vaccination stats (the only brush painting reality at this point) in the U.S.A. I am looking at scientific data which is not MSM.

[sahgwa]

I am looking at the declining child vaccination stats (the only brush painting reality at this point) in the U.S.A. I am looking at scientific data which is not MSM.

Question, are these declining rates for ALL vaccinations or SOME vaccinations? 

The childhood vaccination schedule having triple and quadruple the number of shots it used to, based on lobbying and greed, and not health, since the 1980s is ridiculous.

[FlyersFan]

 being anti WHO is not being anti science. 

Yeah .. to imply that is absurd.   WHO is a NWO globalist operation that is anti-American in nature and that carries water for the communist Chinese.  Americans being anti-WHO is just Americans being SMART.

[quintessentone]

Question, are these declining rates for ALL vaccinations or SOME vaccinations? 

The childhood vaccination schedule having triple and quadruple the number of shots it used to, based on lobbying and greed, and not health, since the 1980s is ridiculous.

Have a read, it varies throughout the decades but the main message should be, to everyone, that unvaccinated children have higher death rates.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lance...X/fulltext

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...0X24006650

[sahgwa]

Have a read, it varies throughout the decades but the main message should be, to everyone, that unvaccinated children have higher death rates.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lance...X/fulltext

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...0X24006650

I admit I am not read up on debating terms or techniques but surely it seems like a false equivalency, like I mentioned above; surely being anti WHO does not necessarily have anything to do with vaccination rates like you are saying?  
Countries can jab all they want and tell the WHO to go pound sand.

[quintessentone]

I admit I am not read up on debating terms or techniques but surely it seems like a false equivalency, like I mentioned above; surely being anti WHO does not necessarily have anything to do with vaccination rates like you are saying?  
Countries can jab all they want and tell the WHO to go pound sand.

It's not so much anti WHO it's anti science and anti fact-checking to push a political narrative.