US National Security Threat: Is this about one thing, or the other?

[guyfriday]

I posted this over at ATS:

https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thr...id27301396
And I think I have a purpose of this story about Russia. If a nuclear bomb goes off in the US, then all media fingers can point to this story and say it was Russia. 

Let's say a false flag event is needed, then all you would need is a highly populated city to have the episode take place. 9/11, New York and DC. Now what if you want a massive distraction that could be used to suspend an election?

An atomic bomb can be brought into a city like LA California without much notice. I know people will say that radiation sensors will go off, but if this was done as a false flag and the Government is behind it, then who is going to report the radiation alarms to the public? 

If a shipping container is dropped off in the city of LA and is holding a bomb with the same yield of the one used in WWII, then mostly just the city of LA will be wiped out and the out laying areas will just be damaged and irradiated. The public mind set will be out for blood against the nation behind the attack. The media won't look at facts, instead they will push out the story that a missile from a Russian satellite is to blame. Hell, with a large amount of radio broadcasting companies having to answer to Alex Soros now, one can guess how that story will play out. 

When you read this "Russian" story, the "pee-tapes" sound more possible than what is being pushed out there on this. Russia doesn't have any reason to attack the US, there are cheaper ways of removing enemy satellites than tossing nukes into space, and most importantly why would the White House not declassify legitimate reports that can paint Russia as being the baddies. Nothing in this story adds up except as a precursor to a massive false flag.

I'm going to stand on this point, "I think this is a play up to a massive false flag event".