UN Inches Closer To Globalization

[theshadowknows]

https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopmen...sotf-2024/

[UltraBudgie]

Oh neat we can embed PDF files? Check out some of the G20 agreements that the media didn't show:

[quintessentone]

https://climateclock.net/

There can be no sustainability with anything if we aren't able to live on planet Earth.

[guyfriday]

I want to play too:
30 visions for a better world in 2030 | World Economic Forum

Here is one version of CO-topia: you walk out of your door in the morning into a green and liveable city. You can choose to call upon a car. An algorithm has calculated the smartest route for the vehicle, and it picks up a few other people on the way. Since the city council has banned private cars in the city, tons of new mobility services have arrived. It is cheaper for you not to own your own car, and it reduces congestion, so you arrive at your destination more quickly and don’t have to spend time looking for parking. There are a lot fewer cars on the streets and the rest are electric. All electricity is green by the way.

I find it telling that the UN, G-20, and the WEF all have the same 2030 playbook. It's almost like a "Conspiracy" against the global population in an attempt to remain both relevant and in control of peoples lives. 

Personal note:
"Everyone thinks they are the next Roman Empire, but in reality they are just a knock-off Delian League, but without Athens."

[sahgwa]

https://climateclock.net/

There can be no sustainability with anything if we aren't able to live on planet Earth.

That looks like the perfect brainwashing fear cloud device for impressionable minds just like the Johns Hopkins COVID case clock.

When we found out 'cases' didn't mean diddly squat when a 'case' could be defined very loosely, and didn't mean jack for lethality and the world wasn't ending, perhaps we will likewise see in the near future that we can never agree on just how much 'CO2' we are releasing in such a measurable way, and truly know what effects it will have on such a large complex system like the Earth. 

In other words, a useless 'clock' in any actionable sense other than fear fear fear.

[Maxmars]

I think it may be safe to say that the UN was always "en route" to a one ('new,' perhaps 'secular') world order... sort of 'by definition.'

Perhaps some enterprising statistically-minded savant may some day come up with a "NWO clock" (much like the "Doomsday Clock") which we could use to fret about the strides these technocrats take on their way to render everyone into an algorithm for a nanny AI to manage.  It'll be the virtual version of "washing their hands of the deplorables."

Each well thought out production of these "communities of like-minded elites" openly biases towards the elimination of sovereignty of culture, demanding functional control of the individual by authority of state, and an algorithmically-narrowed microscopic leadership 'eligibility' spectrum.... go figure.  

The UN could have been many things... it seems fixed on not being anything other than what it is... appointee heaven... (and a theater for activists.)

[quintessentone]

That looks like the perfect brainwashing fear cloud device for impressionable minds just like the Johns Hopkins COVID case clock.

When we found out 'cases' didn't mean diddly squat when a 'case' could be defined very loosely, and didn't mean jack for lethality and the world wasn't ending, perhaps we will likewise see in the near future that we can never agree on just how much 'CO2' we are releasing in such a measurable way, and truly know what effects it will have on such a large complex system like the Earth. 

In other words, a useless 'clock' in any actionable sense other than fear fear fear.

Some realities should be feared.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/2717...the-world/

[Sirius]

Title should be UN inches closer to war.

[sahgwa]

Some realities should be feared.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/2717...the-world/

It's okay if China does it, they are exempt from any nanny state controls as they are the world's factory.

[quintessentone]

It's okay if China does it, they are exempt from any nanny state controls as they are the world's factory.

China is a member of the UN, actually one of it's founders, but to me it looks like they are at opposite ends of their mission and future objectives because the almighty dollar reigns supreme, as it appears to be for all world leaders no matter which type of government.

That UN wish list above is the same old same old from their inception, and not much progress has been achieved IMO. If anything, they should concentrate on internet connection and online security for all and put in controls for AI.

With the decline in China's birth rate that factory could very well come to a screeching halt because of a negative population growth rate, unless robots/AI take over the grunt work.