12-07-2024, 01:32 PM
(12-05-2024, 11:34 AM)quintessentone Wrote: I agree with the good doctor, in that, the scientists need to first determine what is evidence/fact then examine that in detail.
Yes mate he was a great chap - think it's fair to say that out of all official studies conducted on the UFO subject there has been a consistent 'actual.unknown' rate of about 20%.
If you want to delve into some of the actual science then the largest scientific study ever conducted was by the Battelle Memorial Institute - here is the full text of it.
Project Blue Book Special Report 14
Stanton Friedman's archival work also exposed how the Secretary of the Air Force lied to the American public about BBSR14 which found that 'the better the quality of the sighting report, the more likely it was unexplainable'; that 'UNKNOWNS were observed for longer than KNOWNS' and that less than 2% of reports fell in the hoax category.
(12-05-2024, 11:34 AM)quintessentone Wrote: As for stopped clocks, car engine issues etc. I am still on what elements are in those devices that may conduct electromagnetic or other forces that may interfere with their operation.
Good stuff and I salute you for taking such an interest in it.
NASA's Dr Richard Haines has also done a lot of work looking into the true nature of UFO EM effects on aircraft so maybe there's some pointers there.