Trump shot?

[KKLoco]

WOW! The video below by far has the best analysis I’ve seen. They make a very strong case of a second shooter in the upper floor building behind Crooks. Sound analysis at the 17 minute mark. There was definitely 2-3 different guns used.

[ArMaP]

WOW! The video below by far has the best analysis I’ve seen. They make a very strong case of a second shooter in the upper floor building behind Crooks. Sound analysis at the 17 minute mark. There was definitely 2-3 different guns used.

Unfortunately, the camera moved, so the camera's microphone was pointing in a different direction, and those microphones, usually, do not capture sound from all directions, to avoid picking sound from the camera operator.

A real sound analysis (instead of an opinion) would analyse the sound spectrum and intensity. The first video I saw also has sound of the shots and to the naked ear they sound (to me) similar.

[KKLoco]

In this next video, IF true — holy shit!

We’ve seen video of the woman behind Trump acting strange. It is being reported that she’s FBI Assistant Director Janeen Duguiseppi. Skip to the 24 minute mark for that.

---

Unfortunately, the camera moved, so the camera's microphone was pointing in a different direction, and those microphones, usually, do not capture sound from all directions, to avoid picking sound from the camera operator.

A real sound analysis (instead of an opinion) would analyse the sound spectrum and intensity. The first video I saw also has sound of the shots and to the naked ear they sound (to me) similar.

Then why do the first 3 shots lack echoes, and the 5 shots that come seconds later do not?

[727Sky]

What a CROCK !!

[KKLoco]

So now they are saying Crooks parked at a gas station 1/3 of a mile away. Why don’t we have CCTV footage from the gas station?

[ArMaP]

In this next video, IF true — holy shit!

If. I always doubt those "identifications" that basically go like "yes, it's the same person, see how she has a mouth and a nose!"

Then why do the first 3 shots lack echoes, and the 5 shots that come seconds later do not?

I will answer that later, I'm preparing my own sound "analysis".

[boredhere74]

So now they are saying Crooks parked at a gas station 1/3 of a mile away. Why don’t we have CCTV footage from the gas station?

This has to be just more disinformation at this point. When in doubt, muddy those waters. This is worse that a marvel movie plot with all the different locations, vehicles, gear, etc. Hmm I wonder if there might be a way to find out if someone from maintance migt have been on that tower or had access. After really looking at the location of it, that makes alot more sense than a second shooter.

[KKLoco]

This has to be just more disinformation at this point. When in doubt, muddy those waters. This is worse that a marvel movie plot with all the different locations, vehicles, gear, etc. Hmm I wonder if there might be a way to find out if someone from maintance migt have been on that tower or had access. After really looking at the location of it, that makes alot more sense than a second shooter.

To me, it makes more sense that a second shooter was in the upper level of the building behind Crooks WITH THE WINDOW OPEN. This would explain the first three shots being muffled (indoors). And roughly 60-70 feet way from Crooks. So they could say they all came from the same source.

[VulcanWerks]

A thought:

If this was an inside job, which it appears to be, then the organizers would likely have assumed chaos would follow.

Even thinking at the scale and capability of the feds, I think there would have to be some kind of next step in the plan knowing you’d more-less have a revolution on your hands. Or, if “Revolution” is too strong then you’d at least have a very high probability of societal unrest at scale.

That said, you could reasonably assume there was a “next step” to this plan. You could table-top lots of scenarios and I’d be surprised if that didn’t occur.

So, do we have any evidence of National Guard buildups or activations? Troop mobilizations? Large “exercises” in July? Increased strategic air command activity? Larger than normal activity at supply bases or guard stations? Alerts to guard members regarding activation?

Point being that, in my mind, this event would have been the start not the end of the plan.

If being “the start” is right, I suspect there is evidence to be found about who was coordinating all of that. It would have come down from on high but wouldn’t necessarily have required everyone to need to know the circumstances of why the alert was sent - and would have been planned in advance.

I can also see the angle that there was no “next step” specifically but rather a whole bunch of contingency plans - the societal response dictates the government response. Would make it seem more organic (though I think would introduce way too many variables and risk).

Any insights into other happenings around the assassination attempt?

Yes, I can search for this (and will) but I have found that people on here have better information at times.

[boredhere74]

To me, it makes more sense that a second shooter was in the upper level of the building behind Crooks WITH THE WINDOW OPEN. This would explain the first three shots being muffled (indoors). And roughly 60-70 feet way from Crooks. So they could say they all came from the same source.

Is there anything besides wild ass guesses that shows a different trajectory for any of the shots? If there is link it please, I would like to see it. And as far as different sound, it is possible that there were slightly different loads, even if came from the same box. More common with cheap subsonic loads.

---

A thought:

If this was an inside job, which it appears to be, then the organizers would likely have assumed chaos would follow.

Even thinking at the scale and capability of the feds, I think there would have to be some kind of next step in the plan knowing you’d more-less have a revolution on your hands. Or, if “Revolution” is too strong then you’d at least have a very high probability of societal unrest at scale.

That said, you could reasonably assume there was a “next step” to this plan. You could table-top lots of scenarios and I’d be surprised if that didn’t occur.

So, do we have any evidence of National Guard buildups or activations? Troop mobilizations? Large “exercises” in July? Increased strategic air command activity? Larger than normal activity at supply bases or guard stations? Alerts to guard members regarding activation?

Point being that, in my mind, this event would have been the start not the end of the plan.

If being “the start” is right, I suspect there is evidence to be found about who was coordinating all of that. It would have come down from on high but wouldn’t necessarily have required everyone to need to know the circumstances of why the alert was sent - and would have been planned in advance.

I can also see the angle that there was no “next step” specifically but rather a whole bunch of contingency plans - the societal response dictates the government response. Would make it seem more organic (though I think would introduce way too many variables and risk).

Any insights into other happenings around the assassination attempt?

Yes, I can search for this (and will) but I have found that people on here have better information at times.

I'm probably wrong, but I think if it is an inside job, they were betting too much on him making the shot. If he did, there would be no need for a next step, high percent of biden reelected. But since he didnt, way too many varibles came up, and no answers due to lazy thinking, which seems to be the norm. If he made the shot, no one would see how inept the SS agents were, no questions why no drones, limited coverage, etc.