85 |
384 |
JOINED: |
Apr 2024 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
946.00 |
REPUTATION: |
130
|
(07-19-2024, 01:56 AM)Maxmars Wrote: I found an interesting media clip... but I'm uncertain of it's absolute validity (you know how that goes.)
[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w2lVIJc000]
Lucky more were not killed with all the lead flying around !
No one rules if no one obeys
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire
38 |
729 |
JOINED: |
May 2024 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
1570.00 |
REPUTATION: |
|
(07-19-2024, 01:56 AM)Maxmars Wrote: I found an interesting media clip... but I'm uncertain of it's absolute validity (you know how that goes.)
[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w2lVIJc000]
That's a pretty good animation of what likely happened and the trajectory of the shots.
I'd be interested to know how they got the data on the other shots which didn't hit anything notable.
27 |
308 |
JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
526.00 |
REPUTATION: |
70
|
07-19-2024, 08:32 AM
This post was last modified 07-19-2024, 08:35 AM by Waterglass. 
(07-18-2024, 07:40 AM)FlyingClayDisk Wrote: It wasn't on the Deere tractor, it was on the boom-lift parked behind the tractor. The Deere tractor is green, and if you look carefully you will see the yellow boom-lift parked behind it holding up the speaker array. When I looked at the geometry of the shooter's position on the building, the podium position where Trump was standing, and the boom-lift are all in a direct line of the bullet trajectory. Using rough arrow length to illustrate relative distance, it would look something like this Shooter------------------------->>Podium------>>Boom-lift (all right in a straight line).
I will look at the video again. I thought the boom was part of the tractor. Wow, excellent video that you attached. I get it now and thank you!
38 |
729 |
JOINED: |
May 2024 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
1570.00 |
REPUTATION: |
|
07-19-2024, 09:32 AM
This post was last modified 07-19-2024, 09:34 AM by FlyingClayDisk. 
(07-19-2024, 08:32 AM)Waterglass Wrote: I will look at the video again. I thought the boom was part of the tractor. Wow, excellent video that you attached. I get it now and thank you!
This is why I pointed out to you yesterday that it was a separate machine parked behind the Deere tractor in most of the images. Remember, most of the images of the stage area are taken from the vantage point of the audience in the crowd area, not the vantage point of the shooter which was considerably different.
edit - The animated version of the boom lift isn't really too accurate, the machine doesn't look quite like that, but for the purposes of the animation it works fine. The boom portion is accurate, but the cab and running gear part of the machine actually looks different.
1 |
33 |
JOINED: |
May 2024 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
108.00 |
REPUTATION: |
|
(07-19-2024, 01:32 AM)more1thanany1 Wrote: I think this video refutes the water tower theories.
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1814045348450681006
I don't understand why people are so concerned with a second shooter?
Because that would be beddy beddy bad. Heinous even. Should be looked into if there’s any indication of it.
8 |
536 |
JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
756.00 |
REPUTATION: |
180
|
(07-19-2024, 01:16 AM)727Sky Wrote: The rumor about someone on the water tower is now confirmed..
[Video: https://youtu.be/ZlNW-U4hH70]
Thank you!
I was scrambling trying to find some type of footage of the water tower. No doubt there is someone up there. I don’t believe that’s where the shots can from, though. Crooks rushed the operation. That’s why you don’t choose a 20 year old as your patsy.
132 |
1077 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
1834.00 |
REPUTATION: |
183
|
07-19-2024, 11:20 AM
This post was last modified 07-19-2024, 11:23 AM by theshadowknows. 
While we acknowledge the importance of this event and encourage civil discussion, let's ensure our interactions are respectful, and refrain from personal attacks or provocative statements.
Thank you for your cooperation.
8 |
536 |
JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
756.00 |
REPUTATION: |
180
|
(07-19-2024, 01:32 AM)more1thanany1 Wrote: I think this video refutes the water tower theories.
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1814045348450681006
I don't understand why people are so concerned with a second shooter?
No, it doesn’t. You can see a figure on top of the water tower (to the right) at the end of the video.
1 |
33 |
JOINED: |
May 2024 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
108.00 |
REPUTATION: |
|
07-19-2024, 11:58 AM
This post was last modified 07-19-2024, 12:03 PM by StevieRay. 
(07-19-2024, 09:51 AM)StevieRay Wrote: Because that would be beddy beddy bad. Heinous even. Should be looked into if there’s any indication of it.
There is supposedly audio out there that proves 2 shooters. Analyzed by Jovian Pulitzer. Will this evidence just be embargoed / outlawed like the 2020 steal evidence. ?
(07-18-2024, 06:26 PM)ArMaP Wrote: When I don't know something and other people may know, I usually ask.
Is that wrong?
Not when it’s infrequent and somewhat general.
When it’s done a lot in a thread it looks like someone is trying to stop a discussion that they don’t want to occur.
3 |
47 |
JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
118.00 |
REPUTATION: |
15
|
(07-19-2024, 10:06 AM)KKLoco Wrote: Thank you!
I was scrambling trying to find some type of footage of the water tower. No doubt there is someone up there. I don’t believe that’s where the shots can from, though. Crooks rushed the operation. That’s why you don’t choose a 20 year old as your patsy.
If there was someone up there, common sense would be as overwatch. Otherwise, think of the equip it would take to make that shot, moving target, wind speed, distance, unless you just wanted total collateral damage, lost of better, safer, and easier options.
|