62 |
2,168 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

07-25-2025, 04:41 AM
This post was last modified: 07-25-2025, 05:17 AM by Kurokage. 
(07-24-2025, 12:47 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Who’s they?
Everyone.
Or is it really just a contact list that isn’t really a client list that any lawyer would destroy in court so we’re just left with innuendo, slander, from Adam Schiff to Trump we are the political footballs.
So to cover for your dear leader Trump, you're happy to help cover for people like Bill Clinton too, or any other politician who likes to abuse children or take advantage of teenagers and young women. Good for you!!
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
62 |
2,168 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
10 |
326 |
| JOINED: |
Jun 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
07-25-2025, 05:03 AM
This post was last modified: 07-25-2025, 10:15 AM by Ignorant. 
(07-24-2025, 05:43 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: I think the naive thing is thinking it's a select cabal of underage orgy having royalty types and CEOs.
I dont want to say it because its such a baiting comment, but is actually a scientific argument.
And that comment is, "All men are pedohiles"
And while that's technically not true, as pedophilia refers to puberty or younger, it's a statement that many heterosexual men would find a 15+ year old (of safe reproducive age) attractive.
It's proven if you take a bunch of photos of verified 15 through 19 year olds and lie about their age (e.g. label the 19 year old 15 and vice versa) the men responding will overwhelmingly find the same girl both attractive and unattractive depending on the age you label them.
I think it's proof that after the adolescence spurt has sprung child-bearing hips and a more adult face, it is mostly just an age restriction and stigma that determines answers. Like if you can't tell 16 apart from a 20 year old.
It says, if this desire men have to conquer younger girls is actually a mental disorder than an overwhelming number of men have it, and lie about having it, and likely project an abnormal amount of condemnation for a behavior that is actually normal.
I think most straight men are imprinted with a biological (as in reproduction based) "Essence of Wooderson," That is driven to seek the most viable breeding partner, and only a fear of being called sick in the head prevents them from owning that fresher eggs are almost always preferred. It's not an attraction to juveniles as much as the most prime breeding adult possible on an instinct level.
[Video: https://youtu.be/wknywxfcE5M?si=mReNOaI6JfDahVxd]
And that's why I think the cultural obsession with Epstein Island is also an exercise of Mass Projection. Like a collective defense mechanism. An archetype of an anti-exploitation crusader with Tor and terabytes of skeletons.
You're right when it comes to the caveman-residual physical part of attraction. Two things, though:
First, at least in my experience, there's more that goes into attraction than sexual maturity. Emotionally immature women/girls are not attractive to me and I think that makes sense even from a biological perspective. Men would be looking for women who not only can bear their child but are also likely to be good mothers, good partners, etcetera.
I don't think emotional maturity matters to Trump, who is himself barely an adult emotionally.
Second, even if a worrying amount of men are attracted to emotionally immature but sexually mature women, there's still the matter of whether or not they act on it. These Epstein-adjacent people are being judged for how they act, not for how they feel. No one is saying anyone should go to jail for how they feel.
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

well yes this is why in usa they have school institutions split into three groups, elementary school prepubescent, middle school transition, and high school pollinating, and doctrine is any lusting is kept within each cohort to avoid predation. you're suppose to mature with each matriculation but some don't.
62 |
2,168 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

07-25-2025, 07:12 AM
This post was last modified: 07-25-2025, 09:55 AM by Kurokage. 
(07-24-2025, 05:43 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: I think most straight men are imprinted with a biological (as in reproduction based) "Essence of Wooderson," That is driven to seek the most viable breeding partner, and only a fear of being called sick in the head prevents them from owning that fresher eggs are almost always preferred. It's not an attraction to juveniles as much as the most prime breeding adult possible on an instinct level.
Laws were created to protect young girls from becoming pregnant, most of us are not 'cave-men' any more.
Their bodies may be developing but are not yet fully developed. This rises the risk of harm to both child and mother when becoming pregnant at younger ages.
People in authoritative positions aren't doing this for 'breeding' purposes. They're doing it as a form of perverted control and power.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
4 |
508 |
| JOINED: |
Jun 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

307 |
6,506 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

The propaganda war is in full force. I used to never subscribe to the "kabuki theater" theory, but it does fit.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
8 |
654 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(07-25-2025, 10:04 AM)putnam6 Wrote: The propaganda war is in full force. I used to never subscribe to the "kabuki theater" theory, but it does fit.
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...45-302.jpg]
That would not surprise me at all.
It just looks like a cover up due to all the hype coming from Cash, Bongino, and Bondi. Politics has become more, and more like pro wrestling, and this admin has taken it to a new level.
12 |
1,005 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(07-25-2025, 10:04 AM)putnam6 Wrote: The propaganda war is in full force. I used to never subscribe to the "kabuki theater" theory, but it does fit.
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...45-302.jpg]
I'm reading that as Trump himself took a plea deal to get out of his crimes against young girls. That would make sense, and he most likely assumed his name would have been removed from the files due to his compliance with dealing the law.
That back fires in spectacular fashion I would say. Trump is ok with being top buds with pedo and surrounds himself with questionable individuals. Why anyone still stands by this creep is beyond me.
"I hate to break this to ya, but if you always took 86ing as terminate then you didn't pay attention in AIT.
Remove does not at all mean kill bro. To kill creates a entire situation on it own and is just simply not a very cool thing to do."
Me
8 |
654 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(07-25-2025, 12:20 PM)RuchardHurt Wrote: I'm reading that as Trump himself took a plea deal to get out of his crimes against young girls. That would make sense, and he most likely assumed his name would have been removed from the files due to his compliance with dealing the law.
That back fires in spectacular fashion I would say. Trump is ok with being top buds with pedo and surrounds himself with questionable individuals. Why anyone still stands by this creep is beyond me.
That would make for an amazing turn of events, but why didn't the democrats go after Trump for that?
Instead, they made a half-assed attempt to prosecute Trump as a smear campaign, with zero chance of getting anything serious to trial.
|