07-24-2025, 02:13 PM
It's Büéllër Time 
|
07-24-2025, 02:15 PM
(07-24-2025, 01:46 PM)SomeStupidName Wrote: I had the same thought about presidential immunity, well not to the level you did. It still leaves Hillary and Comey open maybe that's his actual goal, idk. Actually I think The Presidential Immunity is for "Official" Acts as President. They could argue he was not acting "officially" !! The exposure for evidence would be like nobody's ever seen!!
It's Büéllër Time ![]()
07-24-2025, 02:22 PM
AngryOldBrewer Wrote:
And just for conversation sakes, how is Trump or Cosplay Barbie gonna arrest Obama? Trump made it impossible for any president past present or future to ever be convicted of anything. Protects him, also protects all the others lol. What if he comes out and says that having sex with little girls was him acting as a future president for the protection of the US? _______________________________________ Lindsey Graham is "urging" Bondi to appoint a Special Council to investigate Obama (again). Just another dog & pony show at tax payer expense
07-24-2025, 02:40 PM
If there was real Epstein proof it would have been released in 2015. Rich people hang out with other rich people sometimes. It happens. Does not mean they are raping children together.
Why did Maxwell not implicate him? Why did Trump try to get Epstein in Miami with an offer to assist? There are very very high level people who can be implicated and those are all people who FLEW to Epstein Island. Not on this planes, to the island. It is out there. Anyone who is on the list of going to that island is actively trying to prevent Grand Jury Testimony. Finally, the statement about he said "are we still talking about this" is because it is not the biggest thing on the plate of a President. I did not vote for the Epstein list and anyone who says that is why...is simply....lying.
07-24-2025, 04:26 PM
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
07-24-2025, 04:58 PM
This post was last modified: 07-24-2025, 05:03 PM by cherokeetroy. 
When people say, "Trump didn't campaign on the Epstein Files/I didn't vote for the Epstein files/Epstein is a non-issue." ..it sounds like:
"There might be a global network of government bureaucrats, world leaders & corporate CEOs who are blackmailed and held hostage by a dangerous cabal of human/child sex traffickers which may even implicate the highest office in the nation ? Who cares?! How does it affect me or the price of eggs for that matter? (Which is down by the way. YOU'RE WELCOME.) I didn't vote to expose this level of corruption. I voted to keep this shit covered up!"
07-24-2025, 05:43 PM
I think the naive thing is thinking it's a select cabal of underage orgy having royalty types and CEOs.
I dont want to say it because its such a baiting comment, but is actually a scientific argument. And that comment is, "All men are pedohiles" And while that's technically not true, as pedophilia refers to puberty or younger, it's a statement that many heterosexual men would find a 15+ year old (of safe reproducive age) attractive. It's proven if you take a bunch of photos of verified 15 through 19 year olds and lie about their age (e.g. label the 19 year old 15 and vice versa) the men responding will overwhelmingly find the same girl both attractive and unattractive depending on the age you label them. I think it's proof that after the adolescence spurt has sprung child-bearing hips and a more adult face, it is mostly just an age restriction and stigma that determines answers. Like if you can't tell 16 apart from a 20 year old. It says, if this desire men have to conquer younger girls is actually a mental disorder than an overwhelming number of men have it, and lie about having it, and likely project an abnormal amount of condemnation for a behavior that is actually normal. I think most straight men are imprinted with a biological (as in reproduction based) "Essence of Wooderson," That is driven to seek the most viable breeding partner, and only a fear of being called sick in the head prevents them from owning that fresher eggs are almost always preferred. It's not an attraction to juveniles as much as the most prime breeding adult possible on an instinct level. And that's why I think the cultural obsession with Epstein Island is also an exercise of Mass Projection. Like a collective defense mechanism. An archetype of an anti-exploitation crusader with Tor and terabytes of skeletons.
07-24-2025, 06:06 PM
More Triggeritis:
Columbia University Agrees to Pay $200M Fine, Ditch DEI in Settlement with Trump Administration Quote:Columbia University reached an agreement with the Trump administration to settle allegations that it failed to stop antisemitism on campus, part of a major deal worked out on Wednesday to restore the school’s federal research funding, the university announced. It's Büéllër Time ![]()
07-24-2025, 07:44 PM
(07-24-2025, 06:06 PM)xuenchen Wrote: More Triggeritis: How does that relate to anything in the thread? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|