11-10-2025, 02:39 PM
This post was last modified: 11-10-2025, 02:39 PM by WallFlowerActive. 
❮
❯
|
11-10-2025, 07:09 PM
This post was last modified: 11-10-2025, 07:14 PM by cherokeetroy. 
11-11-2025, 06:01 AM
This post was last modified: 11-11-2025, 06:03 AM by WallFlowerActive. 
(11-10-2025, 07:09 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: If the House reconvenes, maybe they can finally tackle those Epstein files You claimed the government was shutdown indefinitely. It looks like it will be opened. Then you put up another illusion of a roadblock. When the Biden administration and the FBI director’s daughter as a prosecutor had years to release Epstein files or purse justice for the victims. Where the Epstein mess goes back many past administrations. And across many individual US state agencies and prosecutors. The Epstein case doesn’t hinge on some magical power of the presidency. Where it would only take one leaker.
11-11-2025, 06:07 AM
I wonder what would happen if Trump declassified all Epstein files, without redaction.
11-11-2025, 06:35 AM
This post was last modified: 11-11-2025, 06:37 AM by UltraBudgie. 
(11-11-2025, 06:26 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Probably several lawsuits over victims privacy. So? The President is immune to those. I'm just saying, I'm sure there are classified files on this stuff, as many politicians and foreign heads of state enjoyed their massages from teenagers... do we expect that the nation security apparatus ignore this?
11-11-2025, 07:14 AM
This post was last modified: 11-11-2025, 07:19 AM by WallFlowerActive. 
(11-11-2025, 06:35 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: So? The President is immune to those. I don’t think he is nor the federal government is immune to civil suits where victims rights are clearly violated.
11-11-2025, 07:17 AM
This post was last modified: 11-11-2025, 08:36 AM by WallFlowerActive. 
(11-11-2025, 06:35 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: So? The President is immune to those. Then they need to open up the years of “files” of where the congress and senate had a tax payer slush fund for settling sexual harassment cases with none disclosure agreements.
11-11-2025, 11:36 AM
(11-11-2025, 07:17 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Then they need to open up the years of “files” of where the congress and senate had a tax payer slush fund for settling sexual harassment cases with none disclosure agreements. that fund might be easier to expose unredacted than the Epstein file due to victim rights and laws surrounding crimes against minors. The fund would mostly expose which Congressional rep used it and when. The victim names and what happened wouldn't, or shouldn't, be listed since it's just money being used, but the name of the person taking money from the fund would be exposed.
11-11-2025, 12:49 PM
This post was last modified: 11-11-2025, 12:50 PM by cherokeetroy. 
(11-11-2025, 06:01 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: You claimed the government was shutdown indefinitely. I did say indefinitely based on the theory that the House was recessed to avoid forcing a vote on the Epstein files so like I said, if the House reconvenes, they should be able to pick up right where they left off I put up another illusion of a roadblock? Can you explain why Grijalva hasn't been sworn in? Even she doesn't know why Yeah, you keep bringing up Biden and past administrations dropping the ball and I continually have to point out to you that both Democrats and Republicans are implicated. This isn't a partisan issue, although there are many like you pushing to make it politically devisive due to your devotion to your political leaders. Are you saying you don't want the Epstein files released because of the possibility of lawsuits brought against Trump? That's a stark departure from your stance on public school abuse scandal when you were lecturing how we should all push for accountability |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|





