6 |
1,431 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

08-06-2025, 12:44 PM
This post was last modified: 08-06-2025, 12:46 PM by CriticalStinker. 
(08-06-2025, 12:13 PM)matafuchyou Wrote: Again, for the hundredth time, if there was ANY real evidence of Trump and Epstien it would have been released. All we are reading are the same old tired ass stories that are 're-worded' like they are good friends. Go back and read articles before he ran in 2015 and he was championed for being one of the only to go after him in the Florida case and offer evidence. Evidence that was NOT need because a deal was cut with the DOJ at that time.
Nothing to do with Trump but hey....let's keep that in the news.
This is not over by a long shot. For some reason people think that Trump does not remember how he tried to play nice in his first term and then had an election stolen, was shot and then won again with more votes than his two previous runs.
He has it all. The keys and I for one am looking forward to the hammers dropping. It takes time and he has that. We are 7 months into a 4 year term. These folks are screwed.
Epstien of course worked for the government. It has been proven years ago when he got off so easy in Florida. Multiple grand juries cancelled. I suggest anyone who wants to know how protected he is goes back to that.
I’ve never implied Trump was directly complicit in the acts Epstein and Maxwell are guilty of, but this admin has been behaving weird in terms of changing the official narrative. I don’t know why, but first guess would be to protect donors and allies.
That said, I imagine if there is damning information about individuals in the files, it could implicate people on both sides. If that’s the case, it would make sense why both sides have tried to kill the story all together rather than cherry picking out of it to expose opponents. After all, discovery is part of court cases.
I don’t think we can say with certainty “if there was something damning about _____, their opponents would have leaked it”. Notice I used blank instead of Trump. Sometimes in politics, there is mutually assured destruction. Just like insider trading in politics has only ever been a talking point.
307 |
6,506 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-06-2025, 12:13 PM)matafuchyou Wrote: Again, for the hundredth time, if there was ANY real evidence of Trump and Epstien it would have been released. All we are reading are the same old tired ass stories that are 're-worded' like they are good friends. Go back and read articles before he ran in 2015 and he was championed for being one of the only to go after him in the Florida case and offer evidence. Evidence that was NOT need because a deal was cut with the DOJ at that time.
Nothing to do with Trump but hey....let's keep that in the news.
This is not over by a long shot. For some reason people think that Trump does not remember how he tried to play nice in his first term and then had an election stolen, was shot and then won again with more votes than his two previous runs.
He has it all. The keys and I for one am looking forward to the hammers dropping. It takes time and he has that. We are 7 months into a 4 year term. These folks are screwed.
Epstien of course worked for the government. It has been proven years ago when he got off so easy in Florida. Multiple grand juries cancelled. I suggest anyone who wants to know how protected he is goes back to that.
Quoted because it needs to be read again and again till it sinks in for some, or they are going to be sorely disappointed.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
6 |
1,431 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-06-2025, 01:12 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Quoted because it needs to be read again and again till it sinks in for some, or they are going to be sorely disappointed.
I think everyone is going to be disappointed, left, right and independent.
Everyone has a different idea of what justice they want to see, but I don’t think there will be anything for anyone. The two parties thrive on edging their base while saying their opposition blocked them. It helps them in the next election.
They can all inside trade, exploit the campaigns, and outright lie.
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

08-06-2025, 01:18 PM
This post was last modified: 08-06-2025, 01:20 PM by cherokeetroy. 
Link
Should Information be trusted when it comes from liars?
That's a NO for me
13 |
1,039 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-06-2025, 01:18 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: [Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...rome~2.jpg]
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...rome~2.jpg]
Link
Should Information be trusted when it comes from liars?
That's a NO for me
Yet, if she had come right out and said Trump did incriminating things in front of her, you would believe it in a heartbeat and blast it all over this thread.
51 |
4,137 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-06-2025, 01:18 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: [Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...rome~2.jpg]
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...rome~2.jpg]
Link
Should Information be trusted when it comes from liars?
That's a NO for me
So with NO information, Trump was hiding his guilt.
With information, you conclude it is fake, indicating Trump's guilt.
*yawn*
Consider this the leftist playbook "chapter 2, How To Derp"
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(08-06-2025, 01:23 PM)PorkChop96 Wrote: Yet, if she had come right out and said Trump did incriminating things in front of her, you would believe it in a heartbeat and blast it all over this thread.
And because she absolved Trump in a private deposition, you'll blindly accept it
Everyone knows how party loyalty works
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(08-06-2025, 01:25 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: So with NO information, Trump was hiding his guilt.
With information, you conclude it is fake, indicating Trump's guilt.
*yawn*
Consider this the leftist playbook "chapter 2, How To Derp"
And if Maxwell, a known liar, said Trump raped children what would your response be?
13 |
1,039 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-06-2025, 01:29 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: And because she absolved Trump in a private deposition, you'll blindly accept it
Everyone knows how party loyalty works
Where did I say I accepted what she said? Oh that's right I didn't, but we know you like to assume things.....
She gains nothing from lying and saying Trump did nothing when he did, he has already said he does not plan to pardon her.
13 |
1,039 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-06-2025, 01:31 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: And if Maxwell, a known liar, said Trump raped children what would your response be?
We all know what your response would be......
|