Trump and Epstein were great buddies

[matafuchyou]

There are as many Subpoenas flying as trips Clinton took to Epstein Island....

[AngryOldBrewer]

There are as many Subpoenas flying as trips Clinton took to Epstein Island....

Good, and I hope that everyone who receives one and is found guilty burns at the stake. Not just Trump. ALL OF THEM. I am sure many feel the same way, right? ALL pedo's must pay the for their crimes. So how come we moved one from a prison to Club Med/Fed? Why would anyone want to give a convicted child molester and trafficer a better place to serve out their sentence? As a father, I believe there is only 1 punishment suited for someone like that. It's slow and methodical torture until death. 

Clinton, Trump, Obama, Reagan, Nixon I could care less. So maybe let's stop trying to justify the guilt of one by invoking the name of another. 

Remove all the redactions, release the files in full. We KNOW Trump and Clinton were mentioned multiple times, and so does Clinton and Trump. So who else is on there? Angry fathers everywhere want to know.....

All these rich a'holes were best buds with this slimy worm and I can assume that they weren't "unaware" of who Epstein was and what he did, specifically on his Island.

[xuenchen]

Kamala STILL has unanswered questions from last year! 

[xuenchen]

Hold Yer Horses!!!!!!! 

Leaked FBI Document Reveals Jeffrey Epstein Was a Secret FBI Informant: Report

An exclusive leak obtained by RadarOnline.com reveals that disgraced pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was not only shielded by the U.S. justice system, but was in fact a covert FBI informant, effectively working for “intelligence” years before his notorious 2007 plea deal.
 
In 2018, The Gateway Pundit reported that Jeffrey Epstein was not just protected by federal authorities but may have actively worked as an informant for the FBI under former Director Robert Mueller.
 
According to the uncovered documents released under a successful Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit:

[putnam6]

https://x.com/0HOUR1__/status/1952852154068418592


Guess who just bought Obama's former Martha's Vineyard property for $37 million,
leaving the Obamas a profit of just 26 million

It was not President Trump

Ohh how the plot thickens in America

• The post references the sale of Barack and Michelle Obama's former Martha's Vineyard property for $37 million to Les Wexner, a billionaire linked to Jeffrey Epstein, whose financial relationship with Wexner (1987-2007) included managing his assets, as reported by Vanity Fair (2021), raising questions about potential connections to Epstein's criminal activities.
  
• Wexner's purchase follows the Obamas' 2020 acquisition of the property for $11.75 million and its subsequent resale after renovations, as noted by Homes and Gardens (2025), with the $25 million profit suggesting either significant property value increase or strategic timing amid public scrutiny of Wexner's Epstein ties.
  
• No peer-reviewed studies directly address this transaction, but the Epstein-Wexner association has been scrutinized in legal contexts, with allegations of abuse at Wexner properties prompting calls for investigation, as documented in Wikipedia (2025), adding a layer of intrigue to the real estate deal.
  

[Connector]

https://x.com/0HOUR1__/status/1952852154068418592


Guess who just bought Obama's former Martha's Vineyard property for $37 million,
leaving the Obamas a profit of just 26 million

It was not President Trump

Ohh how the plot thickens in America

• The post references the sale of Barack and Michelle Obama's former Martha's Vineyard property for $37 million to Les Wexner, a billionaire linked to Jeffrey Epstein, whose financial relationship with Wexner (1987-2007) included managing his assets, as reported by Vanity Fair (2021), raising questions about potential connections to Epstein's criminal activities.
  
• Wexner's purchase follows the Obamas' 2020 acquisition of the property for $11.75 million and its subsequent resale after renovations, as noted by Homes and Gardens (2025), with the $25 million profit suggesting either significant property value increase or strategic timing amid public scrutiny of Wexner's Epstein ties.
  
• No peer-reviewed studies directly address this transaction, but the Epstein-Wexner association has been scrutinized in legal contexts, with allegations of abuse at Wexner properties prompting calls for investigation, as documented in Wikipedia (2025), adding a layer of intrigue to the real estate deal.
  

If the Queen had balls, she'd be king. 
And yet this has nothing to do Trump. Shall we go into his real estate transactions? 

Show the files.

[Connector]

Hold Yer Horses!!!!!!! 

Leaked FBI Document Reveals Jeffrey Epstein Was a Secret FBI Informant: Report

And yet they protected him well, didn't they  

[putnam6]

If the Queen had balls, she'd be king. 
And yet this has nothing to do Trump. Shall we go into his real estate transactions? 

Show the files.

Why does every post have to include Trump as if he were the only one wrapped up in this mess, when my post shows the connection between Wexner and Obama, when it's commonly accepted that Wexner and Epstein were thick as thieves, more so than Jeffrey and Donald?
 

• The post references the sale of Barack and Michelle Obama's former Martha's Vineyard property for $37 million to Les Wexner, a billionaire linked to Jeffrey Epstein, whose financial relationship with Wexner (1987-2007) included managing his assets, as reported by Vanity Fair (2021), raising questions about potential connections to Epstein's criminal activities.
  
• Wexner's purchase follows the Obamas' 2020 acquisition of the property for $11.75 million and its subsequent resale after renovations, as noted by Homes and Gardens (2025), with the $25 million profit suggesting either significant property value increase or strategic timing amid public scrutiny of Wexner's Epstein ties.
  
• No peer-reviewed studies directly address this transaction, but the Epstein-Wexner association has been scrutinized in legal contexts, with allegations of abuse at Wexner properties prompting calls for investigation, as documented in Wikipedia (2025), adding a layer of intrigue to the real estate deal.
  

Show the files, show the files...

Where did I say, suggest, or infer otherwise? I fully believe it's the only way

This is hopefully all part of that process. I am sorry it's not moving at a pace you would like, however

Let's be realistic for just a moment, 3 Presidents could have shown the files by now, by all accounts, Epstein and Trump were done by 2012, if not earlier

Who was the FBI protecting since 2012?

Why would they protect a pedo Trump?

If the FBI, Barack, and Hillary had evidence, why did they NOT show the evidence
against Trump BEFORE his first term in 2016?

Ergo, the theory below carries as much weight as any other theory presented on DI

The DNCPTB had evidence and STILL let OMB become President, making them complicit, when they could have easily released the evidence, cutting off Trump's 2016 Presidential campaign at its knees well before OMB acquired executive powers. Then, DNCPTB really would have saved the soul of America...

They did not, that's my question, and it doesn't exonerate Donald J Trump at all

 I fully agree they are all sleazy. FWIW, it's partially the nature of the beast; if governance were a more virtuous and honorable civil service, we would have better candidates to choose from.

By all accounts, James Earl Carter was an honorable and virtuous man, and DC 24/7 left him hollowed out and ineffective
 

 
Giuffre’s allegations, detailed in lawsuits and public statements, fueled widespread interest and conspiracy theories due to Epstein’s connections to high-profile figures.
Trump’s name is prominent for several reasons:
 

• Relationship with Epstein: Trump and Epstein were friends for at least 15 years, socializing at Mar-a-Lago and other events in the 1990s and early 2000s. They were photographed together multiple times, and Trump called Epstein a “terrific guy” in a 2002 interview, noting his preference for younger women. Their relationship reportedly ended around 2004–2007, with Trump claiming he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago for “inappropriate” behavior, specifically for “stealing” employees, including Giuffre.
  

• Allegations and Denials: While Giuffre never accused Trump of sexual misconduct, her 2016 deposition stated she saw him at Epstein’s properties but did not witness him participating in any illicit acts. Another accuser, Maria Farmer, reported a “troubling encounter” with Trump to the FBI in 1996 and 2006, though she provided no evidence of criminality. A 2016 lawsuit by an anonymous “Jane Doe” alleging rape by Trump and Epstein was dropped without substantiation and is unrelated to Giuffre’s case. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing, and no credible evidence links him to Epstein’s crimes.
  
• Public and Media Focus: Trump’s high profile, past friendship with Epstein, and recent comments about Giuffre have kept his name in the spotlight. Conspiracy theories, amplified by both political sides, speculate about a cover-up or hidden “client list,” though the Justice Department found no such evidence. Posts on X and media reports, like a Wall Street Journal claim about a 2003 birthday letter from Trump to Epstein (which Trump denied), have further fueled public interest.
  

In summary, Trump’s prominence in the narrative stems from his documented ties to Epstein, Giuffre’s recruitment at Mar-a-Lago, and his administration’s handling of the Epstein files, compounded by his own statements and ongoing public fascination with the case. However, no substantiated allegations of criminal involvement by Trump have emerged.

[putnam6]

And yet they protected him well, didn't they  [Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmi...lotine.gif]

LOL, prisons are full of all types of informants to various governmental agencies, it's a burn and churn type relationship.
Or if you prefer, use them and lose them

[matafuchyou]

Again, for the hundredth time, if there was ANY real evidence of Trump and Epstien it would have been released. All we are reading are the same old tired ass stories that are 're-worded' like they are good friends. Go back and read articles before he ran in 2015 and he was championed for being one of the only to go after him in the Florida case and offer evidence. Evidence that was NOT need because a deal was cut with the DOJ at that time. 

Nothing to do with Trump but hey....let's keep that in the news.

This is not over by a long shot. For some reason people think that Trump does not remember how he tried to play nice in his first term and then had an election stolen, was shot and then won again with more votes than his two previous runs. 

He has it all. The keys and I for one am looking forward to the hammers dropping. It takes time and he has that. We are 7 months into a 4 year term. These folks are screwed. 

Epstien of course worked for the government. It has been proven years ago when he got off so easy in Florida. Multiple grand juries cancelled. I suggest anyone who wants to know how protected he is goes back to that.