The only 'no' vote on releasing Epstein files

[Sky727]

Not a good look as not all files will once again not be released.

[putnam6]

Wonder how Congressperson McCormick voted....

The majority are crooked, and with that kind of scratch floating around, there are a lot of people who would be tempted.

Im of the opinion we'd be better drafting from viable candidates. 

Pay what they pay congress now, or pay commission to thier current earnings and give bonuses and expenses, hell give them crypto security bonds, 40 acres and a mule, be creative but we have to get better fucking candidates.
 

Rich Baris The People's Pundit reposted

Election Wizard

@ElectionWiz
·
31m

NEW: Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) will move to expel

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL) from Congress after she was indicted for allegedly stealing $5 million in FEMA funds.

Quote
[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/181...normal.jpg]
Election Wizard
@ElectionWiz
·
49m
BREAKING: House Democrat Indicted On Campaign Fraud Charges https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/breakin...um=twitter

[Maxmars]

Instead of actually releasing the "files," let's give ourselves license to "lock away some of them forever."

We'll tell everyone "this is about releasing the file.... (except the classified ones.... which one's are those? sorry... classified.) and
"look good" doing it... the media will help.... promise...

Why is it always a scam with these people?

[Signal Witch]

Oddly it was confirmed that Schumer, Pelosi, and Warren were on the Island at the same time Epstein was there. Hell, what ever happened to those pictures from the security cameras that showed Pelosi there. 

Dear God, please don't let them publish pictures of Schumer and Pelosi nekkid!

[guyfriday]

Dear God, please don't let them publish pictures of Schumer and Pelosi nekkid!

[Image: https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPT.../giphy.gif]

HA HA HA They could use the same picture for both. There was security camera footage of Pelosi being there. Schumer, as of right now, is only on a list of guests.

[Halfswede]

To be fair, Epstein was highly connected and filthy rich. He also loved to socialize. There will be many many people who are in his contacts and only a small percentage are probably aware of what he was doing at the time. I am of the camp that if Trump was Epstein dirty, it would have been released by now.

The guy has been dragged by his opposition with more fervor than anyone in history. He was never on the island and was just a 'buddy' like so many others until he wasn't... for decades. Many others hung on well after he was outed.

That said, if you were on the island, there is no way you didn't know, see, or do something. Is turning a blind eye criminal? I guess it depends where you are, and part of LSJ is the fact that those laws aren't our laws. I'm sure the saying "What happens at LSJ stays..." was a common joke. Is it despicable? Yes.  Half of those hollywood elite are out there raping young actors at parties if you believe even a fraction of the rumors. Elites seem to have a bro-code of sorts, and they will get their just deserves in time.

Also, it goes without saying that if Trump is found to have done Epstein things, then he gets the consequences.

[SteamyAmerican]

This was a head-scratcher for me for sure. The claim is he is trying to protect victims’ rights and identities and such. Perhaps. I don’t know much about Clay Higgins, but I’ve enjoyed some of his takes during congressional inquiries, and as a (I think) a former cop, there could be something to his portrayed stance.

otherwise he’s definitely trying to protect someone or something

[Vermilion]

This was a head-scratcher for me for sure. The claim is he is trying to protect victims’ rights and identities and such. Perhaps. I don’t know much about Clay Higgins, but I’ve enjoyed some of his takes during congressional inquiries, and as a (I think) a former cop, there could be something to his portrayed stance.

otherwise he’s definitely trying to protect someone or something

You think Clay Higgins voted NO because he’s trying to protect someone or something?

He was the ONLY person to vote NO, so he sticks out like a sore thumb.
427-1
His vote, either which way he votes, changes nothing.
If he’s protecting himself or dirty friends, why would he put the spotlight on himself?
You may not like him but your theory just doesn’t work.
We shouldn’t let our dislike for somebody effect our thought process.
That’s instant, self induced karma.

[midicon]

You think Clay Higgins voted NO because he’s trying to protect someone or something?

He was the ONLY person to vote NO, so he sticks out like a sore thumb.
427-1
His vote, either which way he votes, changes nothing.
If he’s protecting himself or dirty friends, why would he put the spotlight on himself?
You may not like him but your theory just doesn’t work.
We shouldn’t let our dislike for somebody effect our thought process.
That’s instant, self induced karma.

Perhaps he expected others to vote no as well.

[Vermilion]

Perhaps he expected others to vote no as well.

No.
He caucuses with the House Freedom Caucus.
He knew how they were voting.
He’s also on the board of directors for the House Republican conference.
He knew how they were voting.
If you’ve never seen him speak you would not know that he has exactly zero filter and speaks his mind quite bluntly and openly, similar to senator John Kennedy of Louisiana.
No wasted words there.
Some of his speeches are goldmines….

'Witness The Arrogance Of Theives In Suits'
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YY3MuqPC0a...5zIGJlc3Qg