0 |
26 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

04-14-2026, 09:14 PM
This post was last modified: 04-15-2026, 12:59 AM by DPKing. 
(04-14-2026, 08:20 PM)Byrd Wrote: The (huge) problem here is that none of the seams are leakproof.
The whole structure is riddled with holes because of how badly the blocks fit together. Even with the mortar.
Not saying it was easy, but I think it is doable, they were able to water proof their ships.
And this also explains why they built these massive structures around these rooms to contain the heat/pressure
The joints look good
https://youtu.be/D3AxsmkKFm4?t=1809
Page down a few times on this link for many more pics
https://isida-project.ucoz.com/egypt_201...ur_red.htm
17 |
1,464 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-14-2026, 08:43 PM)DPKing Wrote: Why do you think the architects who explored this pyramid randomly added this pit at the bottom of the shaft?
Obviously, I don't know.
17 |
1,464 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-14-2026, 09:04 PM)DPKing Wrote: Pic of the boarded up pit plus the top of the angled stop block
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...73e14f.png]
Which part of the diagram is that photo supposed to show?
0 |
26 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

04-15-2026, 06:31 AM
This post was last modified: 04-15-2026, 06:37 AM by DPKing. 
(04-15-2026, 02:33 AM)ArMaP Wrote: Which part of the diagram is that photo supposed to show?
The part I circled in red from the previous post, clipped from this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3AxsmkKFm4&t=1791s
17 |
1,464 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-15-2026, 06:31 AM)DPKing Wrote: The part I circled in red from the previous post
I don't see how. The photo shows what looks like two surfaces making a concave surface, while the diagram only has convex surfaces.
0 |
26 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

04-15-2026, 06:38 AM
This post was last modified: 04-15-2026, 06:42 AM by DPKing. 
I updated with the video I clipped it from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3AxsmkKFm4&t=1791s
But I believe the architects give the best view of it, I guess it wasn't boarded up in the 60s
17 |
1,464 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-15-2026, 06:38 AM)DPKing Wrote: I updated with the video I clipped it from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3AxsmkKFm4&t=1791s
But I believe the architects give the best view of it, I guess it wasn't boarded up in the 60s
Thanks, I see it now.
In the frame capture you posted I didn't understand that the horizontal area was made of boards.
32 |
712 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

04-15-2026, 05:43 PM
This post was last modified: 04-15-2026, 05:45 PM by Byrd. 
(04-14-2026, 09:14 PM)DPKing Wrote: Not saying it was easy, but I think it is doable, they were able to water proof their ships.
And this also explains why they built these massive structures around these rooms to contain the heat/pressure
The joints look good
https://youtu.be/D3AxsmkKFm4?t=1809
Page down a few times on this link for many more pics
https://isida-project.ucoz.com/egypt_201...ur_red.htm
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...de58d0.png]
"Waterproofing" isn't the same as "being able to take 3000 psi." Egyptian ships were sewn together (yes, sewn) and pitch or bitumen was used to caulk them.
Pitch can actually be melted in an ordinary fire (or candle flame, for that matter.)
The strongest caulk we have can only take pressures under 50 psi.
In a previous answer, you gave "Giving 42 atm and 538 degrees Celsius, the numbers needed for this reaction" -- that's roughly 1,000 degrees F and a psi of 617, none of the materials you show can hold up to that kind of action. Doesn't matter how many blocks you stack on it, it will break the original tunnel/materials and you'll have water everywhere.
Also, while a photo might show that "this joint looks good", you're not seeing the mortar (which would have been blasted out with the first rush of water) and you're only seeing the blocks that fit together nicely. (I've seen the place in person.)
0 |
26 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

04-15-2026, 07:58 PM
This post was last modified: 04-15-2026, 08:03 PM by DPKing. 
(04-15-2026, 05:43 PM)Byrd Wrote: "Waterproofing" isn't the same as "being able to take 3000 psi." Egyptian ships were sewn together (yes, sewn) and pitch or bitumen was used to caulk them. Would the stone fuse together? I will ask and see if he has answer for this
The heat would be focused at the top of the air reformers as seen by the staining, the water is creating the pressure
Quote:Also, while a photo might show that "this joint looks good", you're not seeing the mortar (which would have been blasted out with the first rush of water) and you're only seeing the blocks that fit together nicely. (I've seen the place in person.)
The condition of the chambers thousands of years ago is unknown, but looking at the pictures on this site, joints are remarkable even today
https://isida-project.ucoz.com/egypt_201...ur_red.htm
One other point, the staining is heaviest on the south walls(left side in the pics) as the reaction moved through the chambers.
17 |
1,464 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-15-2026, 07:58 PM)DPKing Wrote: Would the stone fuse together? I will ask and see if he has answer for this
The heat would be focused at the top of the air reformers as seen by the staining, the water is creating the pressure
What kind of stone is that, limestone?
Do you know what happens when limestone gets too hot? It turns into quicklime. If those stones are limestone and they used high temperatures (above 600º C) the stones would turn into quicklime and crumble.
And the ammonia would probably react with it too, but was never good at chemistry.
|