The Dark Enlightenment, Trumpworld, and the Thiel–Vance Network: A Primer

[cherokeetroy]

Link




Link

[cherokeetroy]

Link

[quintessentone]

Link

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/eICLtzY.jpeg]
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/4K78y5p.jpeg]

Link

Do you have a direct source with Curtis Yarvin actually saying those things? I'm skeptical of secondhand claims without sources.

[3rdrockfrmsun]

If we’re talking about how the Dark Enlightenment (NRx) is more than just fringe philosophy, Donald Trump isn’t immune. In fact, his rise and continued influence seem deeply entangled with a network of people who are influenced—or at least inspired—by Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug) and other neoreactionary thinkers. Yarvin’s core idea is that democracy isn’t just broken but fundamentally flawed, and that a more efficient, CEO-like sovereign is a better way to rule. Link

Some in Trump’s orbit are openly drawn to this. For example, key figures like JD Vance (Hamel) and Peter Thiel have long-standing ties to Yarvin’s intellectual world, and that’s not just academic — their real-world influence is now playing out in policy and governance. Link Thiel has backed NRx-adjacent thinkers financially and ideologically, and Vance has publicly praised Yarvin’s more radical critiques of American institutions.

What’s especially striking is that analysts see Trump’s current administration as echoing parts of Yarvin’s blueprint: more centralized executive power, a weakening of the administrative state, and the purging or sidelining of career bureaucrats. Link This isn’t just power consolidation for its own sake — many believe it aligns with a broader ideological play to restructure government itself. Some argue that the traditional democratic check-and-balance system is being intentionally bypassed in favor of a more “efficient” structure consistent with neoreactionary theory. Link

Of course, Trump isn’t calling himself a monarch or openly declaring he wants to dismantle democracy. But the fact that people in his inner circle are deeply friendly with—or even influenced by—Dark Enlightenment thinkers raises serious questions about how much of that philosophy is animating real policy, not just ideological fantasy. It’s not just theory anymore; it’s being debated in boardrooms, backrooms, and now in Washington.

[UltraBudgie]

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
― Franklin D. Roosevelt

Sorry to just snipe a quote and leave it at that, but I think this entire thread is premised on the idea that "our democracy" exists, albeit "in peril", as represented. So it's either play along with that illusion, or derail with shadow-boxing.

Interesting ideas, though—thanks!

[3rdrockfrmsun]

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
― Franklin D. Roosevelt

Sorry to just snipe a quote and leave it at that, but I think this entire thread is premised on the idea that "our democracy" exists, albeit "in peril", as represented. So it's either play along with that illusion, or derail with shadow-boxing.

Interesting ideas, though—thanks!

Exactly. That quote shows this isn’t new — power has always flowed through financial and elite networks. Dark Enlightenment discussions aren’t about whether democracy works; they’re about who’s quietly pulling the levers.

[UltraBudgie]

Exactly. That quote shows this isn’t new — power has always flowed through financial and elite networks. Dark Enlightenment discussions aren’t about whether democracy works; they’re about who’s quietly pulling the levers.

I think they're also about the illusions that we find necessary. Democracy has 'worked' in that regard. But the bones are showing.

The 'dark' is the realization that our 'freedoms' exist in a bubble of absolute tyranny. That's a bitter pill to swallow.

To jump track, has anyone read Jacque Fresco?

[cherokeetroy]

[3rdrockfrmsun]

Okay, let’s cut to the chase — we’ve talked about Vance, Thiel, and Trump, but the bigger question is: how much of this is just personalities versus a coordinated network of ideas quietly shaping policy? Are the Dark Enlightenment thinkers really just writing in blogs, or are their theories already influencing the rules, regulations, and structures that govern us?

I’m curious — if these people believe democracy is inherently broken, and they’re the ones funding, mentoring, and promoting political actors, then what exactly does that mean for how the system runs behind the scenes?

[cherokeetroy]

Link