12-09-2025, 09:50 AM
(12-09-2025, 02:04 AM)chr0naut Wrote: [...]
Also, mRNA technology utilizes the cellular transcription mechanisms to create amino-acid chains (proteins) according to the template of an RNA sequence, but it does not make any changes to human genes.
Each cell has numerous ribosomes which transcribe RNA into all sorts of things neccessary to our biochemistry, but these ribosomes exist outside of the cell's nucleous, where the DNA is housed.
RNA normally cannot breach the barrier to get back into the nucleous of the cell. The barrier is fairly one-way, with RNA coming out from the nucleous but blocked from going back. It would require a special enzyme called a reverse-transcriptase to take RNA back into the nucleous where it might possibly react with DNA. The mRNA immunizations don't have any reverse transcriptases and so they cannot even come into proximity of the DNA in the cell, and so they cannot alter any genes.
[...]
I still have some suspicion that some influencial people took the opportunity to fasten human trials of the mRNA technology. I've looked around articles between 2005 and 2018, and there were quite a few about its potential on cancer treatment and such. For example, this one.
I went on wayback machine to look for it, but the first screenshot is from March 2020. It doesn't really mean anything by itself, but I found that interesting.
Seems quite possible that a few opportunists would take the liberty to try to push mRNA more than the other vaccines to gather as much data as possible during the 'crisis'.
As far as the apple tree is concerned, there's probably not much difference between a worm and a human...
Et le ver en dit : - Il y a toujours un pépin dans la pomme...








