(06-14-2024, 04:45 PM)l0st Wrote:
(06-16-2024, 01:12 PM)Maxmars Wrote: I have brought this up in other threads, so please don't attribute this to a bias for or against anyone's arguments.I agree.
We have reached a point where the discussion is circling nearer and nearer to a core of assertions similar to "You said - you said." This is an indicator to me, at least, that the topic is worn down to attention on the posters, not the topic. It seems a natural occurrence in many threads, and no one is faulted by this development.
I am wondering if this thread has 'run it's course'... this doesn't meant the topic is "finished," only that without a reorientation of premises... a new "central question" or a different framework of argument can any meaningful dialogue be experienced.
Perhaps a new thread is in order here, one where the central question isn't about the propriety or justification for a certain school's response to the events reported.
This is just a suggestion.
Plus, you have posters with real experience.
Then you have posters that completely ignore that real experience -- choosing to pick and choose what they read.
I'm out.