23 |
1,235 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-07-2025, 06:47 PM)Shoshanna Wrote: I have a question because I am not too familiar with this theory. Does the 1000 year "golden age" have anything to do with "satan's little season"?
Sorry if this is addressed in the videos I can't watch right now!
Appreciate something new to read! Yay.
Many that subscribe to the hypotheses believe this is biblical. They believe Christ already served his 1000 year reign, and we are now in 'Satan's little season'.
I did not include the biblical aspects to this due the fact that I'm not sure about it. It sounds wonderful to think that the tribulation already happened. I'm just not so sure and honestly, don't believe that part.
3 |
629 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-08-2025, 05:33 AM)andy06shake Wrote: What you've run into sounds more like myths and misread history than real evidence.
There are no records i can find of ancient China or India using hot-air balloons for trade thousands of years ago.
They had unmanned balloons, called "Kongming lanterns", which were sometimes used for military signaling and celebrations, but commerce, not sure about that.
I mean, the notion of ancient Vimanas immediately springs to mind, i have to say.
But the "stone carvings" people point to are usually misinterpreted as religious art, not aircraft.
Can't argue that the British Empire destroyed or looted many cultural treasures, especially so where India is concerned, it was kind of their bag back then, deplorable as it would be considered by today's standards.
But that doesn't mean they hid balloon fleets or flying machines.
Trade between Asia and Europe was done by land aka The Silk Road, and by sea, as far as im aware.
If a high-tech culture had existed 1000s of years ago of years ago, we'd find clear traces.
But we don't, and history clearly shows slow, steady progress.
As to the breakaway civilisational aspect, how would they manage to hide their technological footprint from our modern-day science and technology?
That would be quite the feat if indeed they occupy the same planet imho.
Here is a story from ancient times that would seem to suggest a gentleman by the name of Wan Hu went to the moon.
It's all very interesting, but factual, probably not so much.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wan_Hu
A guy I know who made documentaries for PBS and did lots of on site visits to these places and other people interested in this stuff that belong to the ancient artifact preservation society had pictures of these buildings they too,. It is not myth, and if you know the names of the buildings you can find the evidence.
But lots in the archeology community do not talk about this, because saying things that are not acceptable for the consensus of the time we live in would lose their reputation...so they do not say anything if it goies against the grain.
Once you have the names of the buildings, then you can google them and see the artwork on them, one has a bunch of naked people carved out of stone on the walls, the brits never destroyed that building for some reason, it is intreging. and the sculpturing is real good, and over two thousand years old on that one.
WE aren't going to the conference this year either, after covid we only went to one, and I miss going to them. They had soime good speakers at them, Lee Pennington used to make documentaries, and a few others had their own tv shows for years who were there speaking. some have died, I hope to see Lee again before he kicks the bucket too, maybe we will go down for a day of the conference just to see those people we got to know pretty well over the years.
I don't know what happened to all my notes on the names of the structures I viewed on line, I actually wrote those down. There is lots of evidence of hot air balloons being used in those areas. But none of it seems to be accepted because it is hard to get access to stuff from China, because they know that people cart it off..
106 |
5,993 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(09-08-2025, 12:29 PM)rickymouse Wrote: A guy I know who made documentaries for PBS and did lots of on site visits to these places and other people interested in this stuff that belong to the ancient artifact preservation society had pictures of these buildings they too,. It is not myth, and if you know the names of the buildings you can find the evidence.
But lots in the archeology community do not talk about this, because saying things that are not acceptable for the consensus of the time we live in would lose their reputation...so they do not say anything if it goies against the grain.
Once you have the names of the buildings, then you can google them and see the artwork on them, one has a bunch of naked people carved out of stone on the walls, the brits never destroyed that building for some reason, it is intreging. and the sculpturing is real good, and over two thousand years old on that one.
WE aren't going to the conference this year either, after covid we only went to one, and I miss going to them. They had soime good speakers at them, Lee Pennington used to make documentaries, and a few others had their own tv shows for years who were there speaking. some have died, I hope to see Lee again before he kicks the bucket too, maybe we will go down for a day of the conference just to see those people we got to know pretty well over the years.
I don't know what happened to all my notes on the names of the structures I viewed on line, I actually wrote those down. There is lots of evidence of hot air balloons being used in those areas. But none of it seems to be accepted because it is hard to get access to stuff from China, because they know that people cart it off..
Pictures would be great to see.
But the ones pertaining to the likes of the Tatarian empire mythology.
Well, when you plug those pictures touted as evidence into Google Lens.
It tends to debunk them rather sharpish.
And show them up for what they really are.
Shame you are going to miss your conference this year
It would be tremendous if China were really to open up to the public and the likes of real archaeology and digs.
I mean, who would not wish to see what is in the first emperor's tomb for a start?
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
7 |
164 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

""The theory thrives on selective ignorance, not credible science or history.""
It sure does it's a remarkably ignorant 'idea'. Thanks for your comments. It can be amusing with them trying to agree on when the 'T' empire ended and the imaginary suppression began, right up there with flat earth belief....do people actually believe it or is it just trolling.
23 |
1,235 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-08-2025, 05:48 PM)Hanslune Wrote: ""The theory thrives on selective ignorance, not credible science or history.""
It sure does it's a remarkably ignorant 'idea'. Thanks for your comments. It can be amusing with them trying to agree on when the 'T' empire ended and the imaginary suppression began, right up there with flat earth belief....do people actually believe it or is it just trolling.
Enjoy your ignorance.
Here is a good compilation.
2 |
149 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-07-2025, 01:52 PM)KKLoco Wrote: Well it does involve Freemasons. Hence, the hidden in plain sight. 'Free' masonry is quite appropriate considering they didn't build the buildings. They took them, as in they were 'free' for the taking. Also telling about the 'founding' stones. Tells us right there that they 'found' them. They did not build them.
I put a lot of information up there. Not sure how it can be read through and dismissed within 10 minutes of me posting it.
In my decades in the construction industry I saw many sites below ground level that boggled the mind , I saw things that would blow most peoples mind and it was very quickly covered up .
I even threw a bone to a member in this thread and told him to go get a job down by the river in Edinburgh https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly2l119zlpo
lol and things go much much deeper ?
Never argue with a idiot as you will get dragged down to his level and beaten with his vast experience
0 |
18 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

09-09-2025, 05:59 PM
This post was last modified: 09-09-2025, 06:00 PM by glen200376. 
(09-07-2025, 04:43 PM)Good Bacteria Wrote: It only takes a few seconds to add links to your findings and sources. It helps to understand where it comes from, which certainly isn't you. Please share completely or stop trying to suck the life out of topics on the feed.
"Trust me bro" isn't good enough.
This place will remain a joke as they have taken the worst of ATS and given it moderator status.
He's a famous plagiariser ,shameless with it but never ever credits the original author with the work.
Makes it sound intelligent.
Another ATS government line spouter also is a mod here,the sooner they get their next covid booster the better.
It's a crime to be outspoken!
106 |
5,993 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(09-09-2025, 05:59 PM)glen200376 Wrote: This place will remain a joke as they have taken the worst of ATS and given it moderator status.
He's a famous plagiariser ,shameless with it but never ever credits the original author with the work.
Makes it sound intelligent.
Another ATS government line spouter also is a mod here,the sooner they get their next covid booster the better.
So, have you just come to this thread to fling silly accusations about Glen because you obviously don't like the staff choices?
I'm not plagiarising anything.
This thread is indeed somewhat of a debunked topic, and links have been provided that prove exactly that.
As for the silly, hateful personal attacks, oh dear.
I can only suggest you return to the topic of the thread and stop the childish antics.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
23 |
1,235 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-09-2025, 06:47 PM)andy06shake Wrote: So, have you just come to this thread to fling silly accusations about Glen because you obviously don't like the staff choices?
I'm not plagiarising anything.
This thread is indeed somewhat of a debunked topic, and links have been provided that prove exactly that.
As for the silly, hateful personal attacks, oh dear.
I can only suggest you return to the topic of the thread and stop the childish antics.
Nothing has been debunked. Keep on with your mainstream rhetoric. You are very good at that.
106 |
5,993 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(09-09-2025, 08:56 PM)KKLoco Wrote: Nothing has been debunked. Keep on with your mainstream rhetoric. You are very good at that.
The Tartarian Empire myth has indeed been debunked KKLoco.
And the links i posted clearly do just that.
The first video does it in 4 hours, and the second in a couple of minutes flat.
It's on the same page as Flat Earth, im afraid.
Tell me this, if Tartaria was a such a vast global empire, why is there no consistent written language or currency?
And why do all the "mud flood" buildings have documented architects and construction dates from the 18/20th centuries when you plug them into Goggle Lens?
Additionally, if there was a mud flood in the 1800s, why are there no geological evidence that shows it happened?
If they ruled Central/East Asia, like your maps suggest, why do we have detailed Chinese records spanning thousands of years with no mention of a Tartarian empire?
Here is another video that seriously debunks the Tartarian Empire Myth if you have a spare hour or so.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
|