DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

@TH3WH17ERABB17 Q TIME TO SHOW THE WORLD
I have a new book.  Lol I hear another collective groan incoming.

"What Happened" by Killary Clinton. I wanted to review this book because of the Comey connection and the fact that Comey specifically referred to this book. 
A mind numbing 464 [14] pages, so this is going to take me awhile to parse through.

I can see how this fits in. She was Secretary of State from January 21, 2009 to February 1, 2013. Isn't that curious that Billy's new book "Source Code" was published February 1, 2025. Also the book "The Vaccine" was published February 1, 2022.
25-13=9 Bill Gates.

25-13=12

12+9=21.

She had this book published September 12, 2017.

Scott Gottlieb's thriller "Uncontrolled Spread" was published September 21, 2021.

This book begins on page 3, so this fits with Billy's Plandemic manual. Then we have the chapters beginning and ending on page 21 of some of the books I've covered.

I can tell there is going to be goodies for us because Chapter 2 "Grit and Gratitude" starts on page 17.

Oddly she doesn't number her chapters, so for clarity I will. At least this one doesn't have 45 chapters like her thriller "State of Terror." She is just bitter, very bitter.
Page 3, the first page of the book has 17 lines.


We have some real weirdness as per usual. Skimming through the book we have the unique sentence structure where many lines begin with [AND], we have the 3 . . . dots and specific pages with a line on the top or bottom.


I'm starting with the chapter "Those D*** Emails" which begins on page 289, and there are 14 lines.
This chapter is unique because she has in very bold print specific comments made by people like Comey.
Once again we have a big gap between the title and the start of the text, roughly 9 lines.

"Where there's a will to condemn, evidence will follow"- Chinese proverb.

First line "Imagine you're a kid sitting in history class [30] years from now."

"For those of you in the present, you've most likely already heard more than your fill about my emails. Probably the last thing you want to read right now is more about those "d*** emails", as Bernie Sanders memorably put it. If so skip to the next chapter-...". Question

Not so fast.

She has some serious feelings about James Comey, and not in a positive way.

May 9, 2017 Trump fired Comey. She appears confused as to what the true reason for this action was.
Rod Rosenstein believed that the firing "was the result of the unprofessional handling of the investigation" into the use of her personal email and classified information content.

Meanwhile President Trump stated on NBC that the real reason Comey was fired "was the FBI's investigation into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence."

Comey insisted that there was no case against her, "despite Republican [and internal FBI pressure to say there was..." <Well that's a first that we are hearing that there were FBI agents who were not buying into Comey's narrative that they had to prove what she was thinking, which apparently was more important than the classified information.  

I'm going to break this down so it isn't a wall of words.
Hillary decided to use others to try and explain what exactly happened. 

July 7, 2016.
Comey- " Our best information is that she set it up as a a matter of convenience."

For some reason I'm having difficulty believing her claim that she hadn't a clue how to use a computer and had never sent out an email while she was in the White House or during her first term in the U.S. Senate. She suddenly figured this out in 2006 and she started with the Blackberry phone. It appears that she wants us to believe that adding another email account when she became Secretary was much too difficult to manage, and heavens she would have needed a second phone.

Here's the statement that Comey used to support his theory that she didn't have a clue what she was doing- "In early 2009, I moved my email account from AT&T's server to one that my husband's office had previously set up in our Chappaqua home, which is guarded by Secret Service. Bill had been using it for years and "recently upgraded it. So I just moved my account onto it. I could keep using my Blackberry in exactly the same way way as I always had." Page 293

She feels this factoid is important- She traveled "nearly a million miles to 112 countries to see people face-to-face."
This is really weird. She then provides examples of her emails and the first one-
From: H
To: John Podesta
Sent: Sunday September 20, 2009  [10:28] [Bill Gates birthday]
Subject: When could we talk?

"I'm on endless calls about the UN. Could I call you early tomorrow? Would btw 6:30 and 8:00 be too early?

Please wear socks to bed to keep your feet warm. Question Page 294.

Laws and regulations did not prohibit employees from using their personal email accounts for the conduct of official Department business.

- Report by the State Department Inspector General, May 2016.  Page 295

They just make up stuff as they go along.

She goes on to explain that "every department in the federal government has an Internal Inspector who oversees legal and regulatory compliance."

This is surreal- "There was a lot of confusion and consternation in the press about this question- in part because some of the rules changed after I left office."

Prior to Secretary Kerry, no Secretary of State used a state.gov email address.

Sooo "he continued using his preexisting personal email for official business well into 2015."

Apparently this was well known and if he could do it so could she goes the reasoning.

"The IT staff at the State Department often assisted me in using my Blackberry, particularly when they realized how technologically challenged I was."

Wut? What about highly classified info?

Was she trying to go around and ensure that the messages she was sending and receiving would not be captured and therefore could not be subject to any FOIA requests? After all she brings this point up. Page 296.


 With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton's personal email domain, in its curious configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked.
- FBI Director Jim Comey, in a press conference on July 5, 2016.

" The State Department network and many other highly sensitive government systems, including at the White House and the Pentagon, were all hacked. Colin Powell's emails were hacked. But, as Comey stated, there has never been any evidence that my system was ever compromised." Page 297.
For some strange reason Clinton brings up Benghazi on page 297 & 298.

 Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? but we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.
- Kevin McCarthy on Fox News.



She does not provide specific dates so I've looked them up.

#4845  Oct 09, 2020  [7]: [3:33]  No. [11] 00 [4] 505.

The Benghazi attack took place 9/11 2012 where 4 Americans were killed.

She testified on October 22, 2015 for 11 hours. There were 7 congressional investigations which concluded that Obama and Hillary "were not personally to blame for the tragedy."

A "new' special committee was set up and Hillary was given a binder of emails so she could prep. This also flopped.  She is very tone deaf- after this she was so thrilled with her success she" invited her staff to come to her house in Northwest Washington, where we ate takeout Indian food and decompressed."

There is no question that former Secretary Clinton had authority to delete personal emails without agency supervision.
-Department of Justice court filing, September 2015.


"The Benghazi Committee sent the State Department a blizzard of requests for documents. In August 2014, among 15,000 pages of emails provided to the committee were [8] emails to or from me. At the time no one raised any questions to me about why I was using a non-state.gov account."

This is rather curious. The State Department sent out letters to Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell and Madeline Albright-"for copies of all work emails they might still have in their possession. None of them produced anything."

There were more than 30,000 emails, 31,000 that were personal along with an initial 1,258 identified immediately as purely personal. 

October 28th Clinton was informed about her hundreds of thousands of emails on Weiner's laptop, and she does not indicate how many in the book.  

The FBI did not ask permission from Hillary or Huma to read the emails. From Comey's book he authorized the request for a warrant, she claims he sent off infamous letter 2 days before the warrant. this is strange "In fact, they didn't contact us at all. At the time the FBI had no idea if the emails were new or duplicates of ones already reviewed, or if they were personal or work related, let alone  THAT THEY MIGHT BE CLASSIFIED RETROACTIVELY or not."

Wut???

Comey with little info according to her, sent off the infamous letter and this is really weird-

"Comey had sent a brief, vaguely worded letter to [8] different congressional committees about these new emails-"

Page 310. This is dealing with the FBI interview- "An elevator whisked me and my team up from the basement parking lot to the [8]th floor, where we were brought to a secure conference room. [8] DOJ and FBI lawyers were waiting for me. One of my attorney's, Katherine Turner was [8] and a half months pregnant." 

There just happened to be [8] very serious email chains that represented an extreme danger to national security. Wow
As we know Comey did not attend the FBI interview on July 2nd; "On July 5th, he held a very unusual press conference. It came as a complete surprise to us. We had no warning and had heard no feedback."

This is the press conference where he stated there would be no criminal charges brought against her.

"I had not violated the law about handling classified information- we all three hundred of us who had written emails later classified, were nevertheless "extremely careless", "He said the FBI had found that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of classified email systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government." pages 310 & 311.

b The Director laid out his version of the facts for the news media as if it were a closing argument, but without a trial. It is a textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not to do.
Rod Rosenstein. May 9, 2017 memo to Jeff Sessions.

They have some really serious inconsistencies over whether the information is classified or not and it's most odd that it can be classified retroactively. Sniff One would expect that all the departments would concur over what should be classified. According to Clinton "different agencies disagree about what information should be classified." The same information may be considered classified by one department and not by another. This is seriously messed up and strikes me as some muddying of the waters.

"That's what happened when the State Department and the intelligence agencies reviewed my emails for release. "When reviewing my 30,000 emails, in a number of instances, representatives of various U.S. Intelligence agencies sought to retroactively classify messages that had not previously been marked as classified.

Also "many experts say that overclassification has become a big problem across government."

Page 316- "According to Rudy Giuliani and others with close ties to the FBI, there was a vocal faction within the bureau that was livid that, in their view, Comey had "let me off the hook" in July.  The agents are furious, Jim Kallstrom, the former head of the FBI"s New York office...FBI agents are ready to revolt."

Page 322 "since the election, we've learned that Vice President Mike Pence used a private email for official business when he was governor of Indiana, like so many other state and federal officials  across our country [including, by the way, many staff in the Bush White House, who used a private RNC server for government business and then "lost" more than 20 million emails.]

Sheesh- she doesn't provide the truth-

https://www.npr.org/2009/12/15/121452535...discovered

Last page of the chapter is 323.

Now about that matter of 888 [Mr. Pool connection]. This chapter has 34 pages. Soo we have Hillary with all the 8's connected to the FBI interview- I almost missed this one- she set the meeting up for 8:00 A.M. Page 309.

#34 Nov 1, 2017 10:56:16  No. [14] 7567 [888]

My fellow Americans...
I am puzzled. I'm seeing September stacking up.
First we have Phoebe's birthday and Billy's father death on September 14, 9+14=23 and she will be 23 this year.
Kamala is releasing her book 107 Days on September 23.
We had Benghazi on September 11th.

# 26/98  Feb 12, 2019  10:15:43  No.[ 5139]= 99  798

9/26- Federal SW-IPhone/IPad/Laptop.
Initial analysis of laptop- thousands of emails.

Killary's birthday is October 26.
There are 96 days from September 26 - December 31st. Billy is currently 69. 99 days from September 23.

Something significant must have happened on September 23 for so much focus on this date.

September 23, 2013.
https://www.kff.org/news-summary/jpmorga...hnologies/  Wow

Page 23 in Hillary's book-

"A woman's advocacy group called Ultraviolet had sent 1200 roses to my house earlier that day, and I had packed them up and brought them to the party." Lines 1 & 2.

#4026  Apr 30, 2020  10:05:32  No. [89/81]= 26  377
Paint the roses red.

Denied.
Justice will be served.

4/26 is Jennifer Gates birthday and she turned 23 in 2019 when the plandemic was launched.


https://planetcalc.com/274/

Page 26 we have 3 DOTS.

"So when a friend said she was sending a box of her favorite books. . . and another said he was coming for the weekend even if it was just to take a walk together. . . and another said she was taking me to see a play whether I wanted to go or not. . . I didn't protest or argue. Line 17, 18 & 19.

I guess this book is going to be chock full of comms.
Moment of Zen

[Image: _uccifer.jpg]
We have big news. Kennedy has pulled HHS support for those safe and effective mRNA jabs that do not prevent or protect people from Covid.

https://www.wcvb.com/article/rfk-jr-ends...d/65615124

"BARDA is terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like Covid and flu.
We are shifting that funding towards safer, broader vaccine development platforms."

Hmmm 22?

Billy is oddly silent.
I'm wadding through Clinton's thriller. It is awful.com.

Page 128 has something for us to reflect on.

"On that note, beginning before I ran, political commentators wondered whether I'd inspire an unbeatable wave of women to come and vote for me, in the same way Obama inspired record- breaking black turnout. I hoped I would, of course, but I had my doubts. Gender hasn't been proven to be a motivating force for women voters that some hoped it would be. If it were, we'd probably have had  a woman president or two by now, don't you think? In the end, I won an overwhelming majority of black women [94%] and Latino women [54%]. But I failed to win a majority of white women, although I did better than Obama did in 2012."

Somehow I find her claim of 94% of black women's support rather suspect. Just become Obama was trying to help her campaign she does not equal he. It's even more suspect that she failed to corner the white women.