Speculation: what archaeological sites will be found in the near future?

[Hanslune]

I had said once before, Im mortal.  I do not have the Iq of the gods, not the vast knowledge they hold, so be careful of your logic, it reveals much.

I will go painfully slowly for you, and me.  One subject at a time...

As a "Scientist", archeology or not, you have no right what so ever to use the words "Probably Just Made Up".  Everything must be open to scrutiny regardless of subject . 

They dont stop them, they ridicule, censure, and ignore.  And if their public programing has had its intended outcome, they rely on Cognitive Dissonance to do the rest of the work.   

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/HbrfnBB.jpeg]

To Continue:

Yes you are correct in your self analysis - I'd say you are forehead deep in CD. If you don't have any evidence that something happened that would be the based for x story, should you default to? 1.  It must be real because I want it to be, 2. I say its real unless someone can show evidence I will accept that it isn't, 3. There is evidence it is based on something. I tend to go with if its based on something real its a myth based on an actual event. 

Here's a question Mr. Pyramid was murdered and you are accused of doing it. A. people say you did it, but there is no evidence you did, So are you guilty based on a  'myth' that you did it? Or would you prefer an evidence based trial?

[Hanslune]

I have no evidence to support only a bunch of circumstantial evidence.  It basically started when the Anunnaki creator(genetics/dna) gods  went and added their eccence to homo sapiens creating the new man (Demi gods) Homo Capensis.  Very intelligent but lacking empathy.  They seem to have genetics akin to Chameleons, snakes, with a "King of the Hill" mentality.  I suspect their ambitions and intelligence challenged the Anunnaki for dominance.  This could not be allowed.  This is the mankind spoken of at the end of the Crtias.  This was the mankind that was the target of the Great Flood. 

""All the above is just made up, there is not evidence to support it, Sitchin made a lot  of money lying to the gullible""

You contend that the Ringed City must be else-ware and not the Richat Structure.  You do not allow for inconsistencies or misunderstandings in the writings.  You do not allow for 2000 years of mistranslated, or even the fact that the story is only half there.  I covered this story at ATS quite thoroughly, with images, which is now lost.  It was sufficient to open the mind of any "human Being".  The problem is, Mauritania does not allow scientific exploration in the areas involved.  Using Sat images I have discovered buried structures now being exposed in the rings themselves.  And shared it with the world.  It is now just a matter of time.

False Mauritania allows scientific exploration there you referring to a situation many years ago, Not elsewhere most probably no where, the Richat doesn't fit Plato's discription. What you have is a NATURAL formation. The Clarke Plato is oldest complete version we have from 9th CE.

If you think structure there are Atlantean what happened to the canals, quarries and other buildings? 








You will have to find some way of dealing with your personal Cognitive Dissonance. Or, you can try opening your mind, and consider the possibility.

The Evidence, is THERE!!! Yet you said: "I have no evidence to support only a bunch of circumstantial evidence." Which is true, you also are crippled by not knowing the subject

You said you didn't have evidence? Again I highly suggest you go read what Plato wrote and also realize that humans have been in that area for thousands of years, so yes there might just be some buildings around...

[All Seeing Eye]

 I'd say you are forehead deep in CD. 

LOL  Address the images from within the rings......
















So now you wan to talk about Foreheads LOL LOL  I have a million LOL




So, getting back to the Rings.......?  Dont try to Forehead, me , man lol lol lol  

[quintessentone]

LOL  Address the images from within the rings......

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/6X4qGjp.jpeg]
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/ZQUQPCa.jpeg]

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/uEs38Ai.jpeg]

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/NbzvBLK.jpeg]

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/tQB2UQX.jpeg]

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/JJ6gpsj.jpeg]

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/xm4jnX6.jpeg]

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/0lFBmFX.jpeg]

So now you wan to talk about Foreheads LOL LOL  I have a million LOL

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/x6wYKBV.jpeg]


So, getting back to the Rings.......?  Dont try to Forehead, me , man lol lol lol  

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/GCsdULs.jpeg]

With female reptilians walking around half nude, is it any wonder they are finding half human half reptilian hybrid statues? Was it our reptilian brain at work?

[All Seeing Eye]

With female reptilians walking around half nude, is it any wonder they are finding half human half reptilian hybrid statues? Was it our reptilian brain at work?

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tH_BrBz04&t=215s]

Thanks for the Share :)

Jumping the bones of a separate species has its issues.  Each one have its own triggers, Pheromone
etc, that must be present or triggered.  If not, nothing will happen, naked or not.  

4.5 - 5 Billion years is more than enough time to mix and match to the max lol lol It even looks like we got out "Boobs" from the Anunnaki  ;)  Ya have to give the devil his due lol lol

[Hanslune]

LOL  Address the images from within the rings......I did. I'll make it easier for you - one cannot date structure from images. So what are the C-14 dates from those structures? Thermoluminescence dating of pottery? O Hydration dating on obsidian tools? Rehydroxylation? Etc., etc., can you show real evidence, not your opinion that these date to circa 9360 BCE? Have you read what Plato wrote?  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...3724002111

[All Seeing Eye]

LOL  Address the images from within the rings......I did. I'll make it easier for you - one cannot date structure from images. So what are the C-14 dates from those structures? Thermoluminescence dating of pottery? O Hydration dating on obsidian tools? Rehydroxylation? Etc., etc., can you show real evidence, not your opinion that these date to circa 9360 BCE? Have you read what Plato wrote?  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...3724002111

So, you see them, hooray.  What part of "Mauritania refuses to allow in depth scientific examination of the area", did you miss?  The sites are guarded by the military, and why the CIA flew over to examine the Rings. 

The one site I found that actually was investigated came back with a 5500bc date, which is interesting because that's the same date for the end of the African Humid Period.   

This one is of some buildings on what would have been a island when the Wadi was wet.  And that had to be before 5500bc. So yes, some sites can have a cursory date applied. Its just basic logic.  



This one is just south of the Rings.  It had a quick inspection and was proclaimed "Ancient".  That's all that was allowed.


 
Not far from the first image is what appears to be a boat dock.  Again, not something that would be useful in a dry wadi and would logically come from the African Humid Period.  



I am not going to apply any firm dates because of the Lunar and Solar dating systems.  No one can say which one was being used... Besides, nothing says there could not of been more than one destruction, or flood.

[Harte]

So, you see them, hooray.  What part of "Mauritania refuses to allow in depth scientific examination of the area", did you miss?  The sites are guarded by the military, and why the CIA flew over to examine the Rings. 

FFS, a video was posted right here in this thread showing a girl riding her motorcycle through the place, but you still think Mauritania prevents investigations?
Why didn't the CIA and the military stop her and confiscate her camera?
How the actual fuck is the video still up on YouTube?
How is it that you can purchase tickets for transportation to the site and a day long tour of it if it is so closely guarded?
I know of two archaeological digs conducted there, and I'm not even in that field.
Acheulean stone tools were found, a large quantity, but no ancient structures. How is that possible?

Harte

[All Seeing Eye]

Im not going to spend  a lot of time on you.  I will say, you can walk right over some of these sites, and never see a thing.  It must be seen from above.

Road intersection leading to a ancient waterfall.  You would never see it.



Pie Forts around the area, two being in the rings themselves.  Again, on foot they would never be seen.













Nor can you compare features with other like features on foot.  It wasn't just a City on the Rings, it was a society in the region.  The Pie forts tie it all together.  

The greatest problem in deciphering the site isn't that there were no structures, for there were, some of the bases still exist in the center island and on the second ring.  The problem is in the destruction and how it was conducted, and targeted.  The evidence for that is also present.  Even the direction is visible.   Once that is comprehended you can start to see the evidence in its true context.

I have seen how the Great Flood was conducted and the same mechanization's were used to destroy the Ringed City, and probably other locations as well.  And I have seen evidence that this type of reset was done more than a few times in the ancient past.  So to stand on 10,000 years, or 7000, it just makes no difference to the evidence, on the ground.

[All Seeing Eye]