Epstein Archive
 



  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should I keep my insights to myself?
#91
(04-25-2025, 10:04 AM)ProfessorMeThis Wrote: I really don't know a thing about numerology.  I do know that the answer to the question of life, the universe and everything is 42.  At least as far as Douglas Adams says.

Most people are probably aware that's a pun on the ASCII program language. But if you didn't know, now you do.
I can't help what my face does when you talk
Reply
#92
(04-22-2025, 11:27 PM)chivo Wrote: It would be very interesting to know, anyone on this thread that claims that without eating meat, health is compromised... Did you actually tried not eating meat for more than one day or two? And also, who here butchers their own meat?

I lack some enzymes to metabolize veggies.  I can only eat certain ones and have a conditon called CSID disease according to my genetics.  I only have one point seven percent of the male inuit genetics in me, but that much of that is in metabolism differences.  I really like fish, but seals are too cute to eat so have never even considered it. My father and his brothers ate lots of fish and wild animals, I was brought up hunting and fishing.  My one uncle and his wife used to make all their own breads...sourdough breads, more evidence that somehow without knowing it we adapted to more of an inuit diet.  Plus I prefer sourdough rye over regular bread, regular bread blocks up my digestion.

With that inuit genetics, I also pee out lots of salt, salt fish was explained to me as a medicine for us by my father.  Hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, and hypovolemia were always a problem for me.  I also have tachychardia of unknown type, another inuit trait if you do not eat the proper diet.  Everything seems to fit with my genetics which I got done and checked out with gene apps.  Before the inuit genetics showed up on My Herritage I could not figure out how all these things I experience fit together.

I also had the inuit shovel teeth, but they are not as pronounced as some that have kept the diet more strictly over the last ten generations or more.  My canines used to be long too till I broke them off, they came in handy around Halloween because I could hang them outside of my lips to appear like a vampire or werewolf.

Cooked veggies are less of a problem for me, and I can eat potatoes well, we had a farm when I was young and we grew many acres of potatoes.  I can eat potatoes and carrots  and also some berries and it is no surprise that on that farm we also grew lots of strawberries, and picked wild blueberries every year.  Organic grass fed beef is what I usually buy, usually half a cow a year from some people we know.  Plus I stock a lot of fish in the freezer every year, buying whole fish and processing them myself.  I used to hunt deer and always processed the buck myself, they waste too much when you bring it to a processing place.  I would share that buck with my brother and two uncles...fathers brothers...who would also have had that paternal genetics too.

But over the centuries there are still some differences between the diet of the inuit and the diet of my fathers male side, we adapted somewhat.  I do not look like most inuit other than the teeth and a little darker complexion, so I start researching my DNA to find out what other kind of inuit there were that were white and not asian...checking my genetic data against other variations, evidently there was a far north hominid involved that bread not only with asians, they bread with Europeans too.  Three percent of far northern European guys have that genetics...invaders probably killed most the males during the crusades and also Gangus, but twenty five percent of far northern European women have that inuit genetics to some degree.  I guess those war mongers just killed the males and bred the women back then.

My ancestry genetics does not show the inuit, I guess they are interested in finding where Americans came from, but that data was used in MyHerritage and they are more interested in where the ancestors of Europeans came from.  So science is interpretted by belief and also by desire.

I am not Inuit, I just share ancestors with them.  I am not Finnish either, I am an American and even though I have relations to them, we are of different cultures...My grandfather came from Finland...that does not make me a true Finn, I am a Yooper Finn.
Reply
#93
(04-22-2025, 04:16 PM)Atermis007 Wrote: Btw please educate me as to what is the amino acid that's found in meat that we humans need and can't get from the vegetable kingdom. If you can answer that then I will post my ideas...,

Do you know everything which is in meat and not vegetables?  Besides what we may not know, there's also a different fat profile and a different balance of macros.
Reply
#94
Consuming meat is impossible during certain states of conciseness. Fortunately temporary. Something that comes with it is a new appreciation for everything that is not meat.

It does make me aware that vegetarians and vegans might have a deep connection to everything around them and feel frustrated as outsiders. For some it could be more than just a life style choice and I imagine they feel cloistered and are very empathetic. The empathy is also unfortunately exploited and cults form.
[Image: marvinmartian.gif] eeeeeeeeeEEEK!!!  [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif]
Reply
#95
(04-22-2025, 01:24 PM)Atermis007 Wrote: Hi guys for about 15 yrs or so I have been formulating a theory about how our universe came to be and it has nothing to do with the big bang but uses the same observations and data scientists have used to come up with the big bang theory. I am conflicted as to what to do as I have no faith in humanity as I find ppl to be ignorant backwards and quite frankly of low intelligence. Not saying any of you fall into this category but if the cap fits......to proves point most still consume meat and there's nothing in meat that the human body needs but that's another topic. Science has been stuck in a guagmire for well over 100 yrs and noone has unified classical with quantum mechanics and how the universe works when it comes to its origin and end story. My ideas I think will solve this but as I already said I don't have a high opinion but a small part of me wants to tell it but I have reservations. If you was in my shoes what would you do? Eureka

Lay it on us!  You've got a fairly large group of here who are well above average intelligence here on this website with several physicists (myself included) and a number of other very bright bulbs in mathematics and science.  And, I'm not talking about 'out there' philosophical stuff either; I'm talking about traditional sciences and physics backgrounds.

Besides, what possible harm could come from laying out an alternate theory of the origins of the Universe if laid out to these 'low information' types you referred to?  It would just go over their head's and nothing more would come of it.

So, I will speak for myself (at least) when I say...I'd love to hear the details of your alternate theory.  There are basically two major camps so far.  In one camp you have a Universe which is the direct result of natural evolution at the particle physics level.  And in the other, you have divine intervention.  I'd say, given the opposite ends of the spectrum occupied by those two, there exists plenty of 'capacity' (in the context of grey matter) to hear out something in between.

So, fire away!
Reply
#96
(04-22-2025, 01:35 PM)quintessentone Wrote: Well, I was just watching the new theory posited that our entire universe is rotating, ...

Indeed, this is an interesting theory.  It also begs the question of...'rotating' in relation to what?  In other words, any 'thing' which rotates must be housed inside of something else (we'll just call it a box for ease of discussion) with which to compare it's rotational velocity and/or direction.
 
Quote:I would be very interested in learning your theories on how quantum mechanics may play into all of this, but don't expect me to understand completely because I am a layperson with an interest in quantum mechanics, nothing near being learned in the varied math and science skills needed to scratch the surface of anything universe realted.

Me too.  But to your point; I would be very leery to even sit down for such an explanation which started with quantum mechanics (only) without first explaining the traditional physics principles which lead up to the quantum interactions.  So, I would expect an explanation which starts somewhere other than assuming FTL movement and super positioning are automatically possible without first demonstrating how these conditions came into being, and from what, in the first place.  Anything short of that would just be pure philosophical speculation, in my opinion of course.
Reply