Don't get me started about "Internet" voting...

[Maxmars]

What are "no-contact systems"=


That should be easy to do, after all, the people that create those systems are not the only ones that know how those things work, if the systems are analysed by other people and they agree that it is safe it should be considered safe.

PS: how do people guarantee that using the traditional system the votes are registered and tallied accurately?

By "no contact systems" I mean where citizens are dependent on a device to register their voice in 'voting.'

Where...numerous third parties have both the means and opportunity to 'nullify' the vote entirely within the system internally.

I don't know how many politicians have 'ensured' that they weren't getting ripped off...

I'm sure it isn't enough to simply watch people counting ballots.

[ArMaP]

By "no contact systems" I mean where citizens are dependent on a device to register their voice in 'voting.'

Even in an "hands in the air" voting system we are dependent on who counts them, the only system I see that could be instantly verified would be for the voters to mark their vote on a publicly visible place, so anyone could see everyone's votes.

It's basically a question of trust, if you don't trust the people counting the votes then it all means nothing and no other system will work.