R.I.P David Wilcock and more

[SteamyAmerican]

The problem is that exotic gravity and propulsion are actively studied in universities all over the world.

As to the why of it all, if they are repressing certain technological breakthroughs.

Money and power spring to mind.

But it's a safe bet to suggest that humanity is addicted to oil.

And without it, modern society would gind ot a halt.

Quite literally and within a few weeks.

It's a necessary evil in the world in which we exist.

And we have to keep in mind it's not just used to make fuels.

But also necessary to create plastics, synthetic fabrics, asphalt, lubricants, detergents, paints, adhesives, fertilisers, pesticides, and the list goes on...

I understand the sentiment. Don’t dispute these facts.

What I’m proposing is this. If there were another abundant, useful, cheap (free?) means of transportation, do you think TPTB that have heavily invested in the drilling of oil and mining of minerals would allow for it to see the light of day?

Mankind’s rapacious nature and greed will do us in as a civilization. The world cannot sustain, but progress must be executed, wealth accumulated, until we arrive at whatever lackluster design and future we create through endless consumption.

In the meantime, species extinction, habitat loss, and pollution on land, in waters, and the air must continue for the greater good.

Or so we are told.

[andy06shake]

What I’m proposing is this. If there were another abundant, useful, cheap (free?) means of transportation, do you think TPTB that have heavily invested in the drilling of oil and mining of minerals would allow for it to see the light of day?

Human nature says "No."

Not if "they" wish to remain the powers that be.

I mean, we can but hope...

[Harte]

15 scientist now. Nick Pope, Wilcox and at least one other in addition. Trump has said they are looking in to the scientists deaths and disappearances. Too many for coincidence surely?

Anti-gravity is possible. It’s almost the holy grail. Do we have it?  Doubtful to be honest. Best I can see is that we can negate some of its effects. 

the Tic-tacs aren’t ours. That’s just absolute BS being pushed to worry the USA’s adversaries.  TR3B and other flying triangles likely are, using some form of gravity manipulation along its edges. 

Anyway, I think we’re approaching something big and the real powers behind us are going to bury it.

Neither Nick Pope nor David Wilcock were scientists.
Both were con artists scamming the fringe believers.

Harte

[ARM1968]

How is anti-gravity possible? 

Gravity is't a force you can flip like a magnet.

It's the curvature of spacetime caused by energy and mass.

So there's no simple negative mass switch that cancels it or reverses the effect.

That you’re aware of.

[ARM1968]

Neither Nick Pope nor David Wilcock were scientists.
Both were con artists scamming the fringe believers.

Harte

Maybe read what I wrote. 15 scientists and the other two in addition. I didn’t say they were scientists did I?  They’re not as we both well know. However, it’s interesting. Perhaps a pattern. Perhaps not. Perhaps a pattern disruptor. Certainly the scientists are of very real interest.

[IDELB2006]

Could you provide any links, like obituaries, even a bias corroborating piece of something.

Because big oil jackasses killed EVs the entirety of the auto industry.  In the 1920's EVs had 35% market share. And then the 70s, they became more evil, even though there was a fuel shortage. 

Antigravity propulsion would probably be held back just as much.. Like by Pratt & Whitney or Rolls-Royce. 

But I cant find ANYTHING to prove that antigravity extends beyond things like the "Meissner Effect" or Maglev type stuff. 

But trying to figure out the tic tac will wreck your mind. 

All I know, is its SOMETHING that can: 

1. Move through different mediums without friction.
2. Make a circular impression in the ocean when hovering above it..
3. Defy interia 
4. Do so without controll surfaces of exhaust..

Has to be a self-created space-time bubble that works like Star Trek "warp drive" by directionally expanding or contracting space.  

The power requirements are theoretically absurd. 

So the question is "how do you create 700 Kg of negative energy density from within a 50 ft craft?"

The Casimir Effect and two metal plates can only get you a barely measurable micro fraction of the way there.

This all seems over the top. The FOX article reads like a tabloid, and meanwhile Artemis just returned from the first manned mission to the moon in 50 years.

The tech has not come that far. Sure the electronics, and computers have come a long way.  But the hardware hasn't reached warp drive level yet.

[Harte]

Maybe read what I wrote. 15 scientists and the other two in addition. I didn’t say they were scientists did I?  They’re not as we both well know. However, it’s interesting. Perhaps a pattern. Perhaps not. Perhaps a pattern disruptor. Certainly the scientists are of very real interest.

Perhaps not you, but the tie-in is being made by you AND others.

Harte

[MonkMode]

Just my ranting and raving, perhaps I’m onto something, or perhaps I’m just crazy…

My theory is LIGHT is anti gravity.  Light is basically harnessing the power of gravity, so a strong enough light can negate its force, unlocking the object emanating the light from its grounding / tether to Earth.

An airplane or a rocket is not anti gravity whatsoever.  They harness the power of wind or make their own wind.  Wind is not anti gravity.  It is locked in with the motion of Earth and the Universe that envelopes it.  Same reason a helicopter cannot hover in one spot, while the earth below passes it by.  But the Sun and Moon do just that so they are anti gravity.  So are stars, planets and satellites.

The Earth can spin and the Moon and Sun won’t spin with it.  The Moon and Sun are the Great Anti Gravities.  The Moon is greater than the Sun because it can orbit the Earth in 27.3 days.  The Sun is much slower relatively, taking 365.25 days.

[andy06shake]

That you’re aware of.

That science is aware of by all accounts...

[andy06shake]

Just my ranting and raving, perhaps I’m onto something, or perhaps I’m just crazy…

My theory is LIGHT is anti gravity.  Light is basically harnessing the power of gravity, so a strong enough light can negate its force, unlocking the object emanating the light from its grounding / tether to Earth.

An airplane or a rocket is not anti gravity whatsoever.  They harness the power of wind or make their own wind.  Wind is not anti gravity.  It is locked in with the motion of Earth and the Universe that envelopes it.  Same reason a helicopter cannot hover in one spot, while the earth below passes it by.  But the Sun and Moon do just that so they are anti gravity.  So are stars, planets and satellites.

The Earth can spin and the Moon and Sun won’t spin with it.  The Moon and Sun are the Great Anti Gravities.  The Moon is greater than the Sun because it can orbit the Earth in 27.3 days.  The Sun is much slower relatively, taking 365.25 days.

But light doesn't cancel gravity.

It interacts with it very weakly.

In general relativity, energy, including light(which is a form of electromagnetic radiation), actually contributes to gravity, it does not negate it.

It can exert tiny pressure, but nowhere near enough to counter Earth's pull.