Overpopulation And Malthusian Propaganda.

[Karl12]

Will start a separate thread on the subject but would also really recommend this video exploring the idea that 'bioethics' is just rebranded 'eugenics'.


Bioethics and Eugenics: The Ugly Truth

Here we go - fair to say there are some pretty disturbing things being described.


https://denyignorance.com/Thread-Nazi-Eu...07#pid9007

[Karl12]

Curious findings from Denmark during specific timeframes.

[Karl12]

Don't like linking to the UK propagandist site 'Sky News' but apparently the fertility rate in England and Wales has fallen to the lowest levels since records began in 1938.

Absolutely no mention of covert birth control in vaccines or phthalates and Bisphenol A - just some wishy washy free association about cost of living and other social factors.

This latest data follows analysis commissioned by Sky News showing the UK's fertility rate is falling faster than any other G7 country.

Link

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

Don't like linking to the UK propagandist site 'Sky News' but apparently the fertility rate in England and Wales has fallen to the lowest levels since records began in 1938.

Absolutely no mention of covert birth control in vaccines or phthalates and Bisphenol A - just some wishy washy free association about cost of living and other social factors.

People would rather have pets? Several were converted to homosexuality by subversive behavioral sink and gay lasers?

Not to worry though, while Europe, North America, Austrailia, Japan, South Korea, and especially China will see declines; there will be massive population booms in Congo, Tanzania, Sudan, Niger, Nigeria, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Malawi, Uganda, and Pakistan!

In 2100 the biggest cities will be; Lagos, Kinshasa, Dar Es Salaam, Mumbai, Delhi, Khartoum, Niamey, and Dhaka. I guess it will be a battle for the most polluted river? Largest predominantly muslim slum?

The mean and politically incorrect truth is there is way less responsibility involved in developing world reproduction. There is almost no birth control, way more expectation and even a demand to procreate. And to do so while having no say in much of anything else.

Like in Afghanistan, which has the highest infant mortality rate in the world at 10.1%, yet stand at 15th in the world at 4.52 children per woman. Niger is tops at 6.7 per woman with a 6% mortality rate, with 5.2 children per in Nigeria.

To put that in perspective, the rate in the UK is 1.57 and 1.62 in the USA. EU is 1.42 and Japan 1.26.

There is almost no pressure or expectation in the 1st world for women to reproduce. It's part of the equality thing. There are also far higher standards for what environment is appropriate to bring a child into, and large financial considerations. Those simply don't exist in Niger.

That's going to be to the population story. I swear it's an inherently racist version of a movie I saw...

[Karl12]

Population collapse bump

[Karl12]

Some interesting viewing here on the importance of looking at factual data rather than believing Malthusian propaganda disseminated by corporate disinformants.

Many people believe the world is becoming overpopulated...the reality will shock you.

In this speech, Stephen Shaw explains how rapidly declining birth rates are putting many countries in danger of disappearing within a few generations. Reversing the narratives around children and population growth is urgent for the sake of our civilisations.

[SurferSoul]

People would rather have pets? Several were converted to homosexuality by subversive behavioral sink and gay lasers?

Not to worry though, while Europe, North America, Austrailia, Japan, South Korea, and especially China will see declines; there will be massive population booms in Congo, Tanzania, Sudan, Niger, Nigeria, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Malawi, Uganda, and Pakistan!



The mean and politically incorrect truth is there is way less responsibility involved in developing world reproduction. There is almost no birth control, way more expectation and even a demand to procreate. And to do so while having no say in much of anything else.

Like in Afghanistan, which has the highest infant mortality rate in the world at 10.1%, yet stand at 15th in the world at 4.52 children per woman. Niger is tops at 6.7 per woman with a 6% mortality rate, with 5.2 children per in Nigeria.

To put that in perspective, the rate in the UK is 1.57 and 1.62 in the USA. EU is 1.42 and Japan 1.26.

Someone of your education should know the reason why that is? But I’ll explain anyway. 

The reason people in poor countries have more children is partly because of infant mortality which you pointed out above. Also children are expected at a certain age to go and find work, take care of the younger kids and at least help out in the house/shack. 
The same was true in Europe before the Industrial Revolution. It was common for working class and poor couples to have 6-10 children. 
Another reason is the kids are expected to take care of their parents when one or both become ill and especially when they are elderly. With no access to health care and all the things that come with 1st world civilisation. 

So in summary as can be seen by your argument, large families are mostly impoverished families.
It’s not about birth control, or religion, it’s about the above. The same way it’s always been.

[Karl12]

Hey mate considering the 'covert birth control in vaccines' discussion found in the 1968/1988 Rockefeller annual reports (second post) then perhaps we shouldn't be too surprised at the findings below.







Cheers.

[Proto88]

It a bit double of a double entendre, where the planet capable of sustaining a larger population then what we have today. If it wasn't, there be alot more dead like the fuedal ages.

At the same point in time, quality of life would be substantial better if the population was less, economically that is.

There probably be more jobs then what the current system has since the world a small place.

[Inspector44]

If it weren't for the fantasy of controlling all of mankind, and the utility of the "ideals" of eugenics, the population misdirection would never have been pushed.

The concept of a species breeding itself out of existence has no parallel anywhere in nature.  (No creature in the biosphere has ever done it.)

And yet every arm of the apparatus to "influence" humans gleeful hopped on board to promote the idea.... "we're going to simply breed until there is nothing left."

I remember as a child resenting my parents for scoffing at such a notion, thinking them foolish for not 'accepting' the propaganda...

They would be laughing today except... Whose kids are going to grow up to tend to our future?

No animal that is at the top of the food chain has ever been observed breeding itself out of existence. There is a difference between that and observing an ant hill.