O Looney 's analysis

[annonentity]

Here is a good one from O looney, who thinks the main thrust for a depopulation is simply because the governments are broke and have decided to reduce the population to a more agreeable number. Which tends to make sense as the figures suggest that the present social welfare debt is unsustainable, under the present situation. So bringing in people from other countries who will work for less and not be in the present pension plans would be a good way for the accountant mindset to balance things out. 
  He thinks that when people are dying suddenly, it is the Calamari clots which are causing it, and just like a load of people died of Covid even when it was clear that they died of something else , these clots in lungs and arteries are being passed off as cancers strokes heart attacks and a myriad of other conditions which blocked blood flow to organs can look like.
 i hope that there is some sort of bias in his assessments, because he seems to be an honest man just reporting what he has identified. He thinks that keeping the shots at very low temperatures was a no brainer as any problem with the temperatures would render the gene therapy invalid. Now ninety percent of the NHS is refusing the shot...will plan B  be a war with Russia ? either way if the first plan failed and the public became aware that the shots were dangerous , the politicians would have to react and use a scapegoat to deflect blame...are we seeing this now as MSM seems to be showing the shots in less positive light? either way a good down to earth interview on a YouTube channel instead of rumble or Bitchute.Funeral Director Shocking Warning! The Truth Behind The Lies! - John O'Looney! - YouTube

[rickymouse]

His analysis is somewhat correct.  But I have to add a few things, the NIH and CDC set a protacol for treating covid that the AMA was not in agreement with their treatment procedures, those agencies caused excessive deaths because they were ordering the doctors to do improper procedures....we would have been better off if they would have followed their time tested protocols.

You can control the people and bend them to do your will if you can make them fear, fear also makes people's immune system improperly act which increased deaths.  Another way was to control the food, make us dependent on the government control by making us feel we need them to survive, they led people to believe that clieaning solutions were not adequate, because they did not test to see if they actually killed the virus...no evidence that lysol and pinesol and many others killed the virus.  They wound up being extremely effective when they gave the virus to the companies to test with.

Next, they made it seem like they were saving the world with a vaccine that was not properly tested.

The policy of blaming death on something other than a treatment is common, Cancer is found, they treat the cancer, and half the time the people die of complications from the treatment.  But it keeps the cancer rate lower, and the chemo is over, the the immune system is compromised from the chemo, so the people can catch something else, like the flu or covid and get sepsis or die directly from the virus....which means neither the chemo or the cancer are listed on the death records as cause of death lots of times...they died from the flu or covid.  This is very common procedure, and it is good for the hospitals, they could lose half their cancer patients, yet the cancer treatment showed no deaths from the treatment.  Anesthesia does cause lots of complications too, many times more than the operation when done, that is why the anesthesia bill is almost as high as the surgeon bill...liability insurance is high.  I personally have known a couple of anesthesiologists, and the reality of it is....many people have intolerances to certain anesthesia compounds and not many people actually know they are intolerant...so it is not really the anesthesiologists problem either most times, it must be a stressful job when someone dies or has major side effects on your shift.  Not something I would want to do for a living

I think I talk too much and get carried away, most of you guys that are older probably know most of this stuff already, but the young might not.  It is not something to get paranoid over, Sheet happens, there is risk in everything, and people with big heads have prestigious jobs and don't like to be challenged, they cover up their mistakes and control the narrative.  You can't fight city hall.

Why did eighty five percent of people just get a mild case of covid?  Because their innate immune system actually killed the coronavirus backbone of that virus.  If there were not so many people on meds that increased risk of an improper immune response, the death rate would have not been so high from the virus too.  But they covered up the evidence that showed a relationship caused by common medicines that delayed proper innate response that then triggered cytokine storms after the virus detection was delayed which caused the immune system to go nuts.

Was this to lower population?  Can't say, all I can say is that when the government starts dictating medical professionals and evidence is covered up, people will die.

Almost every medical soup from many cultures for viruses limited the severity of the covid virus, that was actually tested and it was done and peer reviewed.  Chicken soup and other medical soups worked, and with that research, Canada actually added chicken soup to it's list of essential medicines.

Did hydroxochloraquin work?  Yes, somewhat in some people, but the risk of Q wave syndrome was there, and the CDC later recanted that treatment......but other quinines could work, there are four quinine chemistries in coffee, enough that excessive drinking of strong unfiltered (paper drip coffee pot filtered) coffee can cause q wave syndrome symptoms.  Male heart attack rate dropped around the time they switched to Mr. Coffee machines...now they are using the Kurrig type, the terpines are not removed...but it may be better for fighting covid I suppose.

All governments use practices to control their population, I am not against that practice, but I preferred it when Christianity taught people though shall not steal and though shall not kill, when I was young, you did not have to lock the doors in our home town...now you have to lock your door when you go in the back yard and you have to worry about someone shooting you in public.  When I was a kid, kids owned guns, kids carrried pocket knives in school, and kids never used them to shoot anyone in our town or stab anyone in school.  I think our society got screwed up with all the social conditioning they have been screwing up....Very few people committed suicide around here back then.  Now they seem to be glorifying suicide, it makes the kids think they will be appreciated more if they kill themselves because people seem to talk about all the great things their kid did afterwards.  Back when I was a kid, suicide was a sin....no kid wanted to be considered a sinner if they did it....

[ArMaP]

His analysis is somewhat correct.  But I have to add a few things, the NIH and CDC set a protacol for treating covid that the AMA was not in agreement with their treatment procedures, those agencies caused excessive deaths because they were ordering the doctors to do improper procedures....we would have been better off if they would have followed their time tested protocols.

One of the reasons for me to doubt the "plandemic" idea is that not all countries acted in the same way, as they should if this was really something organised worldwide.

In Portugal, the health authority told doctors to try whatever they thought could work, with no retaliations.

PS: less people means less taxes, so I don't think governments would like that.

[Roma]

One of the reasons for me to doubt the "plandemic" idea is that not all countries acted in the same way, as they should if this was really something organised worldwide.

In Portugal, the health authority told doctors to try whatever they thought could work, with no retaliations.

PS: less people means less taxes, so I don't think governments would like that.

True, less people means less taxes however less people would be easier to govern.  I guess it depends on if the end game is money or control.

[Inspector44]

Maybe I'm just a nihilist asshole but I fail to see the negative outcomes of a population reduction in most countries, especially in Asia, Africa and India. If Switzerland was the leader in those I'd be calling for its population to be reduced so don't come at me with the racist accusations. The population of those three land masses contribute to the majority of air and water pollution, deforestation, poaching, illicit drug production and trafficking, slavery, religious based violence, sex based crimes, and e-crimes on this planet. I moved 30 min outside of the city to avoid people and within the last 2 years Californian transplants have bought up all the available land and built hundreds of houses in my area, driving the traffic, noise pollution, and crime up. We have too many mouth breathers on this planet for me to care about pandemics.

[ArMaP]

True, less people means less taxes however less people would be easier to govern.  I guess it depends on if the end game is money or control.

Money gives them the means of control.

[annonentity]

His analysis is somewhat correct.  But I have to add a few things, the NIH and CDC set a protacol for treating covid that the AMA was not in agreement with their treatment procedures, those agencies caused excessive deaths because they were ordering the doctors to do improper procedures....we would have been better off if they would have followed their time tested protocols.

You can control the people and bend them to do your will if you can make them fear, fear also makes people's immune system improperly act which increased deaths.  Another way was to control the food, make us dependent on the government control by making us feel we need them to survive, they led people to believe that clieaning solutions were not adequate, because they did not test to see if they actually killed the virus...no evidence that lysol and pinesol and many others killed the virus.  They wound up being extremely effective when they gave the virus to the companies to test with.

Next, they made it seem like they were saving the world with a vaccine that was not properly tested.

The policy of blaming death on something other than a treatment is common, Cancer is found, they treat the cancer, and half the time the people die of complications from the treatment.  But it keeps the cancer rate lower, and the chemo is over, the the immune system is compromised from the chemo, so the people can catch something else, like the flu or covid and get sepsis or die directly from the virus....which means neither the chemo or the cancer are listed on the death records as cause of death lots of times...they died from the flu or covid.  This is very common procedure, and it is good for the hospitals, they could lose half their cancer patients, yet the cancer treatment showed no deaths from the treatment.  Anesthesia does cause lots of complications too, many times more than the operation when done, that is why the anesthesia bill is almost as high as the surgeon bill...liability insurance is high.  I personally have known a couple of anesthesiologists, and the reality of it is....many people have intolerances to certain anesthesia compounds and not many people actually know they are intolerant...so it is not really the anesthesiologists problem either most times, it must be a stressful job when someone dies or has major side effects on your shift.  Not something I would want to do for a living

I think I talk too much and get carried away, most of you guys that are older probably know most of this stuff already, but the young might not.  It is not something to get paranoid over, Sheet happens, there is risk in everything, and people with big heads have prestigious jobs and don't like to be challenged, they cover up their mistakes and control the narrative.  You can't fight city hall.

Why did eighty five percent of people just get a mild case of covid?  Because their innate immune system actually killed the coronavirus backbone of that virus.  If there were not so many people on meds that increased risk of an improper immune response, the death rate would have not been so high from the virus too.  But they covered up the evidence that showed a relationship caused by common medicines that delayed proper innate response that then triggered cytokine storms after the virus detection was delayed which caused the immune system to go nuts.

Was this to lower population?  Can't say, all I can say is that when the government starts dictating medical professionals and evidence is covered up, people will die.

Almost every medical soup from many cultures for viruses limited the severity of the covid virus, that was actually tested and it was done and peer reviewed.  Chicken soup and other medical soups worked, and with that research, Canada actually added chicken soup to it's list of essential medicines.

Did hydroxochloraquin work?  Yes, somewhat in some people, but the risk of Q wave syndrome was there, and the CDC later recanted that treatment......but other quinines could work, there are four quinine chemistries in coffee, enough that excessive drinking of strong unfiltered (paper drip coffee pot filtered) coffee can cause q wave syndrome symptoms.  Male heart attack rate dropped around the time they switched to Mr. Coffee machines...now they are using the Kurrig type, the terpines are not removed...but it may be better for fighting covid I suppose.

All governments use practices to control their population, I am not against that practice, but I preferred it when Christianity taught people though shall not steal and though shall not kill, when I was young, you did not have to lock the doors in our home town...now you have to lock your door when you go in the back yard and you have to worry about someone shooting you in public.  When I was a kid, kids owned guns, kids carrried pocket knives in school, and kids never used them to shoot anyone in our town or stab anyone in school.  I think our society got screwed up with all the social conditioning they have been screwing up....Very few people committed suicide around here back then.  Now they seem to be glorifying suicide, it makes the kids think they will be appreciated more if they kill themselves because people seem to talk about all the great things their kid did afterwards.  Back when I was a kid, suicide was a sin....no kid wanted to be considered a sinner if they did it....

When you and I were kids, we got good basic fresh food because i doubt the parents could afford a fridge, it was wholesome. Behavior and immune response improve as well with the correct food; there have been trials in prisons to prove this. the food was not from flogged out pastures and the plants could get all the trace elements into them as well. When I was in the health services i remember the tutor saying to always look for the simplest cause of a disease first. This has to be basic nutrition needs, this is the pillar stone of a nation's health until this is fixed anything else is a waste of effort. 
fooling people to make the wrong choices is a growth industry, I am cynical now and can see that Darwinism will always take its course.

[Wild Bill]

What he is missing out on is the latest data on where the deaths are occurring,  Just the western countries are showing a well above average death rate , most are 10 to fifteen percent above average with Japan being 25 percent above average .

Why would the government  borrow heavily to support a immigrant ?? Just their hotel costs alone for a year will take 3 or 4 taxpayers , then their benefits for the year and that is 5 taxpayers to support one immigrant .

One thing he did hit on that has long bothered me is where did all the gold go that Britain once owned , during WW2 I believe we had 30k tons of gold now we have Zero and are trillions in debt and had rationing of food well into the 1950s .

In the UK you were lucky to live to retirement age until recently,  with some areas having the life expectancy in the late 50s , And if you were to strip away all the local born residents from the population the numbers have actually gone down .

[Kwaka]

Good to see Youtube is changing its policy on vaccination hesitancy. See how the link holds up in the test on time, can take the thought police a while to get around to the delete button at times.

O'Looney done a good job, calling it as he saw it.

[andy06shake]

While some developed countries face declining birth rates and aging populations, global population is still increasing, surpassing 8 billion in 2022. 

Population growth is simply slowing due to improved education, healthcare, and family planning.

There's no credible evidence of coordinated efforts to reduce the population unnaturally.

And all this antiquated depopulation nonsense harks back to the likes of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which has been thoroughly debunked and widely condemned.