Nipah Virus Thread.

[Karl12]

and his father died on September 14.

This journalist states Bill Gates father was a eugenicist mate.

Jeffrey Epstein's email discussion about Bill Gates with Barry Josephson is also brought up.


QUOTE:

• "I've been thinking a lot about that question that you asked Bill Gates - how do we get rid of poor people as a whole? And I think I have an answer."


From 21:40

[Karl12]

Regarding that last vid also notable that eugenicist Bill Gates Senior was 'Co Chair' of the Gates Foundation and responsible for its 'guiding vision and strategic direction'.


Post

I have followed Aaron Siri right from the beginning. He was instrumental in challenging Pfizer's request to have all the data sealed for 75 years.

Yes very thorough chap mate and he certainly has a way of cutting through all the bullshit.

He poos up here (around 5:05) showing congressional report charts on the safety testing of drugs big pharma are liable for versus the safety testing of drugs big pharma are not liable for.

There's a huge difference and interesting to see modern day IG Farben iterations like 'Sanofi' also pop up.

This vid also shows FDA Director William Egan squirming in his seat about the safety testing of Mercury.

[Karl12]

We have some Nipah news.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/7/...bangladesh

Thanks for the heads up mate and looks like Rockefeller WHO 'experts' are now warning a potential outbreak poses a ‘real risk’ to America.. with the Rockefeller CDC on 'high alert'.

Real funny that some of the countries now mobilising for a real outbreak like Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines etc. just weeks ago held an incredibly similar Rockefeller WHO 'simulation' there for a fake outbreak.

Just what are the odds?

Are there any statisticians out there lol?

This isn't the first time the Rockefellers have 'predicted' events with absolute uncanny accuracy.

The only conclusion I can arrive at is that the Rockefellers are quite literally 'psychic'.

[Karl12]

This journalist states Bill Gates father was a eugenicist mate.

Jeffrey Epstein's email discussion about Bill Gates with Barry Josephson is also brought up.


QUOTE:

• "I've been thinking a lot about that question that you asked Bill Gates - how do we get rid of poor people as a whole? And I think I have an answer."


From 21:40

New video link:

From 49:10

https://www.youtube.com/live/Bfen5cXrq4E

[Karl12]

[Thoughtful3]

Thanks for the heads up mate and looks like Rockefeller WHO 'experts' are now warning a potential outbreak poses a ‘real risk’ to America.. with the Rockefeller CDC on 'high alert'.

Real funny that some of the countries now mobilising for a real outbreak like Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines etc. just weeks ago held an incredibly similar Rockefeller WHO 'simulation' there for a fake outbreak.

Just what are the odds?

Are there any statisticians out there lol?

This isn't the first time the Rockefellers have 'predicted' events with absolute uncanny accuracy.

The only conclusion I can arrive at is that the Rockefellers are quite literally 'psychic'.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]

The Plandemic Treaty is running into some turbulence.


https://healthpolicy-watch.news/powerful...e-ignored/

They have seriously underestimated the third world members. This PABS  system seems to have a fatal flaw- 

  I would be suspicious as well when anonymous is a feature.

"We also question how any terms and conditions can be enforced when users are permitted to remain anonymous."
Of course the big boys in town just say move along, move along, nothing to see here."

[Karl12]

Appreciate the link mate - sometimes think these people are quite literally insane as there's no doubt the new WHO treaty will literally increase the chance of man-made pandemics.

They literally want a situation where over 94 countries are 'incentivized and encouraged' to perform gain-of-function experiments on lethal pathogens.

They explicitly incentivize making microorganisms 'more transmissible' or 'more pathogenic' - then they want all these weaponized genomic sequences shared around with member states.

It's insane (and illegal) and all there in their own documents.

The WHO’s Pandemic Treaty Draft Requires the Sharing of Potential Pandemic Pathogens. This is a Euphemism for Bioweapons Proliferation.

Obviously, the best way to spare us from another pandemic is to immediately stop funding gain-of-function (GOF) research and get rid of all existing GOF organisms. Let all nations build huge bonfires and burn up their evil creations at the same time, while allowing other nations to inspect their biological facilities and records.

But the WHO in its June 2023 Bureau Text of the Draft Pandemic Treaty  (PDF) has a plan that is the exact opposite of this. In the WHO’s draft treaty, which most nations’ rulers appear to have bought into, all governments will share all viruses and bacteria they come up with that are determined to have “pandemic potential” — share them with the WHO and other governments, putting their genomic sequences online. No, I am not making this up. (draft treaty PDF) Then the WHO and all the Fauci’s of the world would gain access to all the newly identified dangerous viruses. Would hackers also gain access to the sequences? This pandemic plan should make you feel anything but secure. 

Fauci, Tedros, and their ilk at the WHO, and those managing biodefense and biomedical research for nation states are on one side, the side that gains access to ever more potential biological weapons, and the rest of us are on the other, at their mercy.

This poorly conceptualized plan used to be called proliferation of weapons of mass destruction—and it is almost certainly illegal. (For example, see Security Council resolution 1540 adopted in 2004.) But this is the plan of the WHO and of many of our leaders. Governments will all share the weapons. 

Link

[cherokeetroy]

I found this detailed thread on Epstein connection to ResearchGate 

I wasn't sure where to put it, so I'm posting it here

It's not directly tied to the Nipah Virus but it describes how algorithms in science research are influenced to control narratives 

It brought to mind how scientific research was managed during Covid by Fauchi, Gates, etc...

This type of manipulation validates the suspicion that they capitalize on world health crisis & pandemics

Turning disease into profit industry 


Link

"BOMBSHELL: Bill Gates & Jeffrey Epstein weren’t just “donating to science”…  


They were secretly buying CONTROL over what scientists discover, share, and believe — through a platform you probably use: ResearchGate.

Leaked insider documents expose the real playbook: influence + money + power disguised as “helping science.”  

What is ResearchGate exactly? 

Think Facebook — but for scientists. A free site where researchers connect, share papers (often full PDFs), ask questions, and team up on ideas.  

Over 25 million members worldwide right now! 

Sounds helpful? Sure. But leaked insider docs reveal it's built as a for-profit business to make big money from science.  

Gates invested $10M in 2013 — not pure charity, but a savvy "digital platform" bet. Like owning LinkedIn... but for the brains shaping our world.  

Control the platform → control the flow of scientific ideas.

The shady part: Contracts link personal profits to ResearchGate's value growing. 

Gates' advisor (Boris Nikolic) could cash in based on how much the company's worth rises. Even big "advances" like $2.5M-$10M mentioned. 

This creates huge motivation to hype it up—boost users, news buzz, and prices. Why? More value = more payouts. 

It's like insider trading vibes in science.

Now it gets really shady: Epstein was in the loop. 

Leaked emails from Nikolic (Gates' top science advisor) to Jeffrey Epstein share insider secrets:

"I will know in 2-3 weeks when is next round plan and for how much."

Plus endless hype blasts:

"Some good news — ResearchGate is making major progress… A flurry of news just started!"

"Just today… This will be a major breakthrough for the future of ResearchGate."

ScienceMagazine
Science article on ResearchGate!"

This isn't friendly chit-chat. It's feeding Epstein real-time investment timing + press momentum to keep the excitement (and valuations) pumping.  

Why would Gates' team loop a convicted sex offender 

And the emails keep coming: Nikolic floods Epstein with glowing press clips on ResearchGate — like pieces from Nature magazine highlighting it as "ResearchGate is winning."  

This is classic narrative grooming: Constantly push stories that make the platform look unstoppable → attract more users, investors, and hype.  

Hype → more growth → more power over what scientists see and share.  

Simple equation with massive stakes.

All that growth & hype? Here's how ResearchGate turns it into real money 

Their own business plans lay it out:

• Targeted ads from pharma & lab suppliers (click the tool in a paper → buy it) 
• Job boards & recruitment listings (headhunters pay big) 
• Premium subscriptions for individuals & universities (analytics, no ads, advanced search) 
• Early vision for a marketplace selling lab products/services

It's not just a helpful sharing site — it's a machine that captures scientists' attention and monetizes it.  

Now think: On your feed, who decides which paper pops up first? Algorithms do — exactly like Instagram or YouTube.  

Whoever controls those algorithms [you read: Gates and Epstein] can quietly steer what research gets seen, what gets buried, and what becomes "the next big thing."

Why would billionaires like Gates & Epstein crave this kind of power?  

Owning a hub like ResearchGate lets them shape what research explodes into the spotlight — and what quietly fades away.  

Control the feeds & recommendations = quietly steer:

• What scientists chase & publish next 
• What projects get grants & funding 
• What the public is told is “solid science”

It’s not heavy-handed censorship — it’s subtle, invisible steering of ideas, trends, and “truths.”  

Your TikTok/Instagram feed already molds your worldview…
Now imagine the same game running science.  

Who decides what counts as breakthrough? Who decides what gets buried?

Deeper level: This same power gives billionaires real leverage over the giants of scientific publishing too.

Big academic publishers like ElsevierConnect, SpringerNature and WeAreTan ddecide what gets officially published — and what gets rejected outright — shaping the dominant narratives in science and society.  

But ResearchGate owns the "end flow": After publication, users upload millions of full PDFs (160M+ publication pages today), letting anyone read papers for free and bypassing expensive paywalls.  

Publishers despised this — they sued ResearchGate for massive copyright violations (Elsevier + American Chemical Society cases starting 2017, fought for years, finally settled 2023 with special sharing agreements).

Bottom line: When a platform controls how research is actually seen and shared at massive scale, publishers have to play ball — partner, compromise, or lose traffic/relevance.  

Whoever owns ResearchGate (RG) can quietly pressure the gatekeepers themselves.

Proof this leverage is real? History shows it: Publishers now partner with ResearchGate instead of fighting forever.

• Springer Nature: Long-term content syndication (since 2019) — full-text articles show up on RG profiles. 

• Taylor & Francis: Expanded "Journal Home" deal to 800 journals (as of Feb 2026) — boosts visibility & open access on RG. 

• Elsevier/ACS: Sued for years → settled 2023 with automated upload checks & compliant sharing tools.

Control the sharing hub → publishers must cooperate or lose eyeballs/traffic.  

Billionaires [Gates/Epstein crew] win big: Steer narratives across the ecosystem without owning a single journal.

Not just Gates & Epstein — meet the Arnolds.

Billionaire "philanthropists" via Arnold Ventures have quietly poured millions into the very tools that police scientific narratives:

• Center for Open Science (COS) — $5.25 million launch grant in 2013 + $7.5 million in 2016 + $2.625 million in 2019 (and other grants, totaling over $25 million cumulatively) for open infrastructure, reproducibility, and research transparency tools.

• Retraction Watch (produced by The Center for Scientific Integrity — CSI) — grants (e.g., $300,000 in 2015) for tracking retractions & database builds, with CSI partnering closely with COS. 

• PubPeer — operating support ($412,000 in 2016 + $150,000 in 2019) for anonymous post-pub commenting.

These three are closely linked through funding, partnerships, and overlapping figures like Ivan Oransky (co-founder/executive director of CSI/Retraction Watch, PubPeer board member).

Sounds like boosting integrity?  

But look closer: These investments build an ecosystem critics say weaponizes retractions to enforce "approved" narratives — followed by coordinated smearing campaigns via PubPeer "PubSmear" Network Mob to silence dissenters.  

They fund the watchdogs → decide what gets retracted → orchestrate defamation to protect the circle.  

Same elite playbook: Control the referees to control the game.

Pattern emerging: The billionaire-backed so-called “integrity” machine (COS, CSI/Retraction Watch, PubPeer) protects its insiders while targeting outsiders to enforce narratives.  

Proof in our bombshell from last November (17 Nov 2025):  

Elisabeth M. Bik — the fake “science integrity consultant” with >10,000 PubPeer comments — has spent years stalking, smearing, and ruining careers.  

But flag HER papers or her mob’s?  
100% censored.
17 critical comments on her & collaborators’ work → all instantly blocked.
One slipped through (23 Nov 2024) → erased after exactly 10 days (3 Dec 2024).  

The PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob rigs the game to shield itself.  

Double standards exposed. These “watchdogs” aren’t neutral — they’re enforcers.

Pattern emerging loud and clear:

Gates & Epstein → control through platforms like ResearchGate (sharing, feeds, visibility).

Arnolds → control through so-called “integrity” institutions (COS, CSI/Retraction Watch, PubPeer — retractions, smears, censorship).

Both: Twist science for power, markets, and perception.

Not help — hijack.

From Epstein shadows to “charity” fronts, it's elite games.

To pull it off, they need complicit academics, compromised editors, and journalists on payroll.

Science should be free — not for sale."

[Thoughtful3]

[Video: https://youtu.be/drVqia3LvYg]

Full steam ahead- the Gates Foundation is now on the defensive. They have seriously underestimated the people there. 


Just for fun-


https:/www.google.com/search?q=youtube+bill+gates+moquito+swamp+skeleton&rlz=1C1VDKB_enUS966US966&oq=youtube+bill+gates+moquito+swamp+skeleton&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIJCAEQIRgKGKABMgkIAhAhGAoYoAEyCQgDECEYChigAdIBCjMxMjIwajBqMTWoAgqwAgHxBUb-5zWt4w678QVG_uc1reMOuw&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:50e249b6,vid:e0fU5cnliY0,st:0

Musky toes tinkering-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhFD9yQBS60


https://www.alliancemagazine.org/blog/ga...ion-surge/

Of course it's misinformation.

Amazingly there was suddenly a vaccine for that.

Too little too late. The Gates Foundation has been funding Oxytec for quite some time now. They lie, just lie.

https://www.oxitec.com/en/news/oxitecs-m...ed-regions

We need to keep an eye on this musky toe breeding farm in Brazil-

I was just wondering if the Ebola/ Nepah could be spread through GMO mosquitoes.

https://www.passporthealthusa.com/2018/0...pah-virus/


-----
After viewing your link about the Gates Foundation holding the London Conference 100th anniversary of the Eugenics Conference in London it brought up Billy's fixation with #100.

The Spanish flu occured in 1918-1919 and what a coincidence Covid was launched in 2019. He also had a huge impact in the book "Disease X- 100 Days to End Pandemics."

In my earlier link they note that there was 100 days remaining until the plandemic treaty would/ or should be finalized. Hopefully things get gummed up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygj9hlbl48Y

[Karl12]

I was just wondering if the Ebola/ Nepah could be spread through GMO mosquitoes..

Great info post there bud.

Regarding mozzies there's a disturbing thread below about DARPA gene drives and how 'mosquitos can be used as carriers for bio-weapons'.

Gene drives are also known as 'genetic extinction technology' and the Gates Foundation are right at the heart of it.


Gene Drives And The Gates Foundation.


On that thread there are also claims of 'fertility regulating vaccines' getting Gates kicked out of Kenya.

Also found it a bit curious that his family (the Rockefellers) were rather enthusiastic about putting 'covert human sterilization agents' into vaccines as far back as the 1960's.

The relevant Rockefeller annual reports are linked here in PDF format.