"Most Controversial Clip on the Internet Right Now"

[andy06shake]

You mean using derogatory terms based more on self false authority and confirmation bias than actual proof. Especially if it’s an adult applied to teenagers and children.  Those damn kids.  I’m I right.   You go with your bad self.  Lol

Nope, not in the slightest.

But your continued fascinations with me.

And the terminology i obviously taught you is rather telling, to say the least.

Cheers for the free headspace, all the same. 

[andy06shake]

Shrugs..

like the Union Jack Movement.  How dare they take a stand against those that oppose free speech and “immigrants” that will not embrace modern Uk views on human rights and freedom of religion.

You mean the flag sh@ggers and roundabout painters? LoL

They tick your "ned" box in spades and then some.
 
But they are not the topic of the thread, and you seem to be unable to answer simple questions once again.
 
Let's try again, shall we?
 
Tell me you don't entertain any of the racist nonsense they came away with?

Elucidate please.

[WallFlowerActive]

But your continued fascinations with me.

More about your hypocrisy and the need of an adult to use derogatory terms aimed at children.

[andy06shake]

More about your hypocrisy and the need of an adult to use derogatory terms aimed at children.

Not an answer to the questions.

Again, just a queer fascination with me.

Have you considered counseling or seeking professional help? 

However, if you could simply answer the question pertinent to the discussion, that might be nice.

"Tell me you don't entertain any of the racist nonsense they came away with?"

[WallFlowerActive]

Not an answer to the questions.

Sorry.  You can’t be taken seriously when you remind me of something.

 
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/c0eae1e4-aa...ae74f8/gif

I see the classism outlined by Charles Dickens is still a practice for some in the UK.

Merry Christmas and God bless us everyone.

[andy06shake]

Sorry.  You can’t be taken seriously when you remind me of something.

 [Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...7c5d2c.gif]
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/c0eae1e4-aa...ae74f8/gif

I see the classism outlined by Charles Dickens is still a practice for some in the UK.

Merry Christmas and God bless us everyone.

Please continue the personal attack and refusal to answer questions about the thread, again, it speaks volumes.

I'll continue to endeavor all the same, and on topic i may add.

"Tell me you don't entertain any of the racist nonsense they came away with?"

[UltraBudgie]

"Tell me you don't entertain any of the racist nonsense they came away with?"

I'm curious if you could enumerate those, because the interviewer hasn't posted anything more than that clip on their Insta yet, from what I've found. Or are you referring to some other source?

Anyway, from that clip, I heard a brief reference to differences in "fertility window" at the beginning (which is debatable), and melanin production (which is obvious).

I'm uneducated on the genetics, but I was able to find this:

Accumulating evidence suggests that reproductive potential and function may be different across racial and ethnic groups. Racial differences have been demonstrated in pubertal timing, infertility, outcomes after assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment, and reproductive aging. Recently, racial differences have also been described in serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH), a sensitive biomarker of ovarian reserve, supporting the notion that ovarian reserve differs between racial/ethnic groups. The existence of such racial/ethnic differences in ovarian reserve, as reflected by AMH, may have important clinical implications for reproductive endocrinologists. However, the mechanisms which may underlie such racial differences in ovarian reserve are unclear. Various genetic factors and environmental factors such as obesity, smoking, and vitamin D deficiency which have been shown to correlate with serum AMH levels and also display significant racial/ethnic variations are discussed in this review. Improving our understanding of racial differences in ovarian reserve and their underlying causes may be essential for infertility treatment in minority women and lead to better reproductive planning, improved treatment outcomes, and timely interventions which may prolong reproductive lifespan in these women.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3857838/

Now, whether this science was being leveraged to support a more agenda-driven argument (which such things often are) isn't included in the clip. From the demeanour of the interviewer perhaps not? She seemed to be denying the science as a matter of her neutral belief, rather than any kind of impassioned rebuttal. So I'm wondering what you think you're arguing against?

[andy06shake]

I'm curious if you could enumerate those, because the interviewer hasn't posted anything more than that clip on their Insta yet, from what I've found. Or are you referring to some other source?

Anyway, from that clip, I heard a brief reference to differences in "fertility window" at the beginning (which is debatable), and melanin production (which is obvious).

I'm uneducated on the genetics, but I was able to find this:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3857838/

Now, whether this science was being leveraged to support a more agenda-driven argument (which such things often are) isn't included in the clip. From the demeanour of the interviewer perhaps not? She seemed to be denying the science as a matter of her neutral belief, rather than any kind of impassioned rebuttal. So I'm wondering what you think you're arguing against?

The body language alone, combined with the statements he came away with tells us everything we need to know.

Yes, more context would be nice.

I'm kind of busy right now Ultra.

Be nice if someone could find or post the entire interview.

As far as im aware most scientists agree that race is a social category, not a biological one.

[chivo]

A bit more context to the clip video:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watc...t-genetics

Couldn't find the whole original video yet, still searching

[Maxmars]

Neither one of these folks are very good representatives of anyone other than themselves.  Debaters, they are not.

The first persons' circuit gets shorted out upon the utterances of the second... which starts out 'shorted out.'

These people aren't "trying to understand" each other... they are "trying to deny" each other as ignorant... and it starts almost immediately as the clip begins...
(Could be an 'editing' thing... maybe this started out less contentious.)

Either they both know each other well, or they each argue with the implicit "image" they cast upon the other.

It could have made a fair debate, if they wanted to actually do something other than make each other appear unreasonable.

As was pointed out... they are each postured to disagree with any imagery the other posits.  So they are - effectively - both wrong and right simultaneously... and the circle continues...