"Most Controversial Clip on the Internet Right Now"

[ArMaP]

What I find interesting is how the guy presenting the video tries to make the viewers accept his point of view against the woman on the left but and doesn't show what her answer was when the man makes a clearer answer.

It looks just like another guy looking for an enemy that cannot react against him (they do that by using other people's videos) and supporters of something we don't really know what it is, as he isn't clear about his intentions on doing that video.

Psychologically and socially interesting, but nothing special.

[andy06shake]

What I find interesting is how the guy presenting the video tries to make the viewers accept his point of view against the woman on the left but and doesn't show what her answer was when the man makes a clearer answer.

It looks just like another guy looking for an enemy that cannot react against him (they do that by using other people's videos) and supporters of something we don't really know what it is, as he isn't clear about his intentions on doing that video.

Psychologically and socially interesting, but nothing special.

The full video, rather than just the short, may add some much needed additonal context methinks.

But i don't imagine anything they have to say will turn out to be agreeable or steeped in actual science.

[ArMaP]

Oh-ho! I was wondering if I used the term "mulatto" correctly, so I googled it. Up came this from Encyclopedia Britannica:

"mulatto, a person of mixed white and Black ancestry. The term mulatto is a legacy of attempts to establish taxonomies of race, a concept that science has shown to be socially constructed and to have no biological basis."

https://www.britannica.com/topic/mulatto-people

I think maybe I've stumbled on the explanation for this...

It's interesting that they do not talk about the word's origin.
"Mulatto" comes from Spanish or Portuguese (we use the same word, like in many other cases) "mulato", meaning of mixed race, like mules ("mula" in Portuguese), who are the offspring of a donkey and a mare.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

Hi. So I found on the tube this video about people debating genetics differences and whatnot, the subject is not as important, what I find interesting is how two apparently intelligent and normally able people can be so distant in their perception of what is true and what is false (or incorrect), or to put it in a different way, their perception of reality.

I found also valuable some conclusions of the streamer who is posting the video, on how the social trends, corporate interests and political views influence the minds of the vulnerable and basically turns them in propaganda spreading useful numbskulls (last four words are mine).

I was interested in the opinions of the members of this wonderful platform Deny Ignorance, since we usually have so many disagreements concerning gender, politics and corporate backed scientific research.

Take a look, video is short and I think also worth the time.

[Video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6FNHsQ7hIRg]

Thanks

My favorite part of the video was what the narrator said at the end

That being said here's my take:

The lone woman seems to think that what he is saying is a social construct and not based in reality because personal constructs are personal. He is saying it is based in reality because they can be scientifically proven.

My statement: They are both correct and slightly off. Race IS a social construct *what I think she is saying*. The process of identifying race IS a real method *what I think he is saying* based on reality because without it we couldn't identify the differences.

A dollar only has the value we all collectively believe it has, in reality it is a piece of paper. A promisary note promising this paper's value is equal to an exchange of goods.
They were very interesting to watch. One thinks outside the box and down the road and the other takes things apart at face value. Together they'd be whole. If only they could see through each other's eyes.... its a shame

The only reason they are both wrong is denying the other with their "I am right therefore you must be wrong mentality" when they are actually saying two seperate right things and simply just dont understand each other. Its kind of funny if you think about it.

[chivo]

My favorite part of the video was what the narrator said at the end

That being said here's my take:

The lone woman seems to think that what he is saying is a social construct and not based in reality because personal constructs are personal. He is saying it is based in reality because they can be scientifically proven.

My statement: They are both correct and slightly off. Race IS a social construct *what I think she is saying*. The process of identifying race IS a real method *what I think he is saying* based on reality because without it we couldn't identify the differences.

A dollar only has the value we all collectively believe it has, in reality it is a piece of paper. A promisary note promising this paper's value is equal to an exchange of goods.
They were very interesting to watch. One thinks outside the box and down the road and the other takes things apart at face value. Together they'd be whole. If only they could see through each other's eyes.... its a shame

The only reason they are both wrong is denying the other with their "I am right therefore you must be wrong mentality" when they are actually saying two seperate right things and simply just dont understand each other. Its kind of funny if you think about it.

Yes yes to all of it. Thanks man 

[chivo]

Who is the Ren-Faire girl? Is this a tradwife thing?

From the Guardian piece: "...She assures me she is not a tradwife. “I’m not dressing trad now because we’re into trad, because before I was dressing like a Russian Bond villain. We do what’s practical.”
apparently they are fanatics on data and numbers and hence they are super frugal, to the point of freezing on a farm house somewhere in the US because of saving on heating while gathering millions for charity and non profit... Taking things to the extremes never works in the long run in my experience.
A lot of what they are saying is related to the replacement theory of the white peoples which is something that many consider another "conspiracy" (I know this word is being misused but this is what the normal people say "naah this are just conspiracies").

[WallFlowerActive]

Guess that's what happens when your wife is also your sister. 

Stupid racist white supremacists. 

He says "Gineticly" at 1:12, so he can't even get simple words correct.  

Any two humans are about 99.9% genetically identical, so... 

How about the term Ned….

[andy06shake]

How about the term Ned….

How about it?

Those two complete and utter catapults look more ""home-schooled"" imho.

So more like seriously flawed education, as opposed to non-educated, methinks.

Tell me you don't entertain any of the nonsense they came away with?

[WallFlowerActive]

How about it?

You mean using derogatory terms based more on self false authority and confirmation bias than actual proof. Especially if it’s an adult applied to teenagers and children.  Those damn kids.  I’m I right.   You go with your bad self.  Lol

[WallFlowerActive]

How about it?

Those two complete and utter catapults look more ""home-schooled"" imho.

So more like seriously flawed education, as opposed to non-educated, methinks.

Tell me you don't entertain any of the nonsense they came away with?

Shrugs..

like the Union Jack Movement.  How dare they take a stand against those that oppose free speech and “immigrants” that will not embrace modern Uk views on human rights and freedom of religion.