An Inconvenient Study (2025) – the growing health crisis caused by childhood vaccines

[UltraBudgie]

I only see reference docs, maybe I'm blind. I immediately distrust anyone that does a premiere and don't just give information that is claimed to be of the utmost importance. Kind of looks like fishing for political targeting, I'm sure that is against the law these days and abuse of PI

Here is the link to the study:
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/...-Study.pdf

Here is the limitations section from the study:

Limitations of this Study

This study has limitations. As it is retrospective, we cannot exclude the possibility of unidentified confounders. However, this concern is tempered by the finding of significant associations between vaccination and particular outcomes, with some hazard ratios in the 2.5-6 times risk. We lacked information on socioeconomic status, or potentially relevant post birth factors, such as diet or lifestyle, but did adjust for several important baseline confounders such as gender, ethnicity, gestational age and birthweight. To detect the potential for uncontrolled confounding, the literature suggests evaluating disorders with no expected causal association with vaccination, a control outcome, such as injuries or cancer.17 Importantly in this regard we found no association between vaccine exposure and cancer. Additionally, we relied on diagnosis codes in administrative data, which is commonly used in epidemiologic research but has some inherent limitations.

Unvaccinated children have less healthcare utilization overall.73 Well visits coincide with the vaccination schedule and provide more opportunities for assessment and diagnosis in those receiving vaccines, compared to unvaccinated children, which could introduce an ascertainment bias. In this study, exposed children had an average of 7 annual encounters, irrespective of having a chronic health condition. Unexposed children had an average of 2 annual encounters but an average of almost 5 annual encounters if diagnosed with a chronic health condition. This likely demonstrates that when a child had a medical condition, parents sought healthcare. In fact, many conditions evaluated in this study are serious and cannot be self-treated, such as asthma, diabetes, anaphylaxis or asthma attack, warranting urgent medical attention. We nonetheless conducted several sensitivity analyses to explore the influence of healthcare utilization in order to improve the internal validity of this study and minimize potential ascertainment bias. To ensure the unexposed group’s shorter follow-up duration did not influence the results, we repeated the Cox proportional hazards analysis for the chronic health composite outcome for those in the plan for one, three and five years and for those who had at least one healthcare encounter, which demonstrated results consistent with the overall findings. The association between vaccination and developing a chronic health condition was independent of these factors. Therefore, our findings do not appear to be due to differential use of health resources.

Our study solely evaluated whether or not vaccination was associated with clinically relevant outcomes, conditions that currently contribute to the rising chronic health disease burden in children. We did not evaluate the influence of temporal relationships, individual vaccines, or the number of vaccines, which limits this investigation but also minimizes the potential for reverse causality.

[Sky727]

If true, I had no idea the population was so pathetic !

65M Americans take psychiatric drugs.
1 in 4 adults. Nearly 1 in 10 kids.
Millions are medicated, numbed, and stuck with no safe way out.

If this affects you—or someone you love—this thread matters ?

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/19785...=topunroll

[RichardHurt]

If true, I had no idea the population was so pathetic !

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/19785...=topunroll

Yo G, at some point it would be super nice if you at the very least gave at least a sentence for us to give an opinion.
I am sure we all know your feelings but for new members they may get confused and think this is a post and jet outa here. Let us not give them nerds a out.
We can be friendly in order to ensure the site gains traction.
Think of it like a late night show but with super cool guests that are not names.
We are the best to bring others to the field of disclosure.

[Sky727]

Yo G, at some point it would be super nice if you at the very least gave at least a sentence for us to give an opinion.
I am sure we all know your feelings but for new members they may get confused and think this is a post and jet outa here. Let us not give them nerds a out.
We can be friendly in order to ensure the site gains traction.
Think of it like a late night show but with super cool guests that are not names.
We are the best to bring others to the field of disclosure.

I guess you missed;

 Quote:   "65M Americans take psychiatric drugs.
1 in 4 adults. Nearly 1 in 10 kids.
Millions are medicated, numbed, and stuck with no safe way out.

If this affects you—or someone you love—this thread matters ?"

Other than making a recording and reading to the "incapable of clicking" or me reading a link in person, there is not, nor is there anything I can or want to do; kinda like those who have the internet but can not view a video; not my problem if information can not be gleamed or understood from a title.... 

I realize everything we post goes into some data mine with our names on it so ask me if I want to spoon feed the creeps who want to know what kind of barbecue sauce I purchased yesterday .. Like most places, if something interest one person it will be of interest to others if not, then their loss or out of their purview of interest.

Like free speech call it free reading and linking.

[UltraBudgie]

also thread reader app sucks, instead just replace x.com with xcancel.com:

https://xcancel.com/LauraDelano/status/1...1116135784

that way you can see replies to the thread too

[Sky727]

also thread reader app sucks, instead just replace x.com with xcancel.com:

https://xcancel.com/LauraDelano/status/1...1116135784

that way you can see replies to the thread too

Neat !! Thanks !

[Raptured]

Kind of funny how our species has existed, grown, progressed and proliferated for many thousands of years but only in the last century or so we need a "pill" for everything.


as always....follow the $$$

[BeyondKnowledge]

Kind of funny how our species has existed, grown, progressed and proliferated for many thousands of years but only in the last century or so we need a "pill" for everything.


as always....follow the $$$

Well, it took centuries to stop the masses from burning the scientists and doctors of the time. They were learning even though they had little support in learning except on their own or very small groups. 

The movie "Clan of the Cave Bear" has some examples of these doctors but that was long before people started burning them because of religion.

Most were burnt. Some stoned or drowned. Mostly for knowing things that organized religions did not understand. 

In modern times, more are kept alive longer by medication which means they need more medication for more problems. I also think many medications are for the side effects of the ones some need to keep them alive.

Then there is the money angle you mentioned. Some are in it for profit above anything else.