Jimmy Kimmel pulled from the air over false comment about Kirk murder

[WallFlowerActive]

YouTube banned him because of Jan. 6 and they were right to do so. They now will pay him his paltry $24 million because they now want the upcoming elections to have a fair debating field. They were right to ban him, today is a new day.

How is banning Trump right if your argument is Kimmel shouldn’t have been called out for making a political statement that was false concerning the murder of Kirk to incite and smear.  Lying or spreading misinformation concerning a crime where the FCC has the authority to regulate broadcast TV for the common good. 

What is actually reported.
 

YouTube to pay $24.5 million to settle lawsuit over Trump’s account suspension after Jan. 6 attack

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/yout...n-6-attack

Google declined to comment on the reasons for the settlement,
but Trump’s YouTube account has been restored since 2023. The settlement is will barely dent Alphabet, which has a market value of nearly $3 trillion — an increase of about $600 billion, or 25%, since Trump’s return to the White House.
The disclosure of the settlement came a week before a scheduled Oct. 6 court hearing to discuss the case with U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers in Oakland, California.

Any claims by you why the owner of YouTube which is Google settled is hyperbole by you.

Where it’s still an obvious lie Kimmel had to be fired so Disney could get its merger.

Where if Kimmel did get fired, you can’t even show it was a freedom of speech issue.  ABC / Disney as the employer of Kimmel has the right to fire Kimmel on how he represents the company.  

Where Kimmel made a statement as a claim that was wrong and use as a smear opening ABC up to liable.

[WallFlowerActive]

And I have no tolerance for you dredging up your old bullshit.

What about - cheeseburger in chief. Not even a smile?

I guess Trump is smiling over getting 24 million from Google for being wrongly banned.

[DBCowboy]

I've noticed a disturbing pattern over the last 10 years or so.

Not 1 Leftist can ever admit they are wrong.

If I was as wrong as many times as you have been, I would stop posting.

Oh my Gawd!

They still believe the Russian Hooker Pee scam!

[WallFlowerActive]

Criminal incitement:

"In the U.S., intent is tied to the Brandenburg standard, which requires a deliberate effort to incite imminent lawless action. For example, advocating violence in a context where it is unlikely to occur imminently may not meet this threshold. This highlights the importance of evaluating the speaker’s mindset and context."

What Is Incitement and How Is It Defined in Law? - LegalClarity
---

So.  That’s what Kimmel is guilty of?

[WallFlowerActive]

Kimmel who?  The new shinny lie is Trump tearing down the White House.  The democratic party that wants to tear down and burn everything after voicing the White House was built by slaves are now concerned about the east wing of the White House?

[RichardHurt]

Kimmel who?  The new shinny lie is Trump tearing down the White House.  The democratic party that wants to tear down and burn everything after voicing the White House was built by slaves are now concerned about the east wing of the White House?

Just so I know that you know, part of the white house is being torn down.
You are aware of this correct?

[PorkChop96]

Just so I know that you know, part of the white house is being torn down.
You are aware of this correct?

Being torn down to renovate that wing into a ballroom. All at no cost to the taxpayers, all being funded through Trump himself and private investors. 

Not exactly the first time a president has taken it upon themselves to renovate/redo/add on to parts of the white House.

[RichardHurt]

Being torn down to renovate that wing into a ballroom. All at no cost to the taxpayers, all being funded through Trump himself and private investors. 

Not exactly the first time a president has taken it upon themselves to renovate/redo/add on to parts of the white House.

I am fully aware and don't really give a shit what happens to that house. 
I just want to make sure that person is aware of the facts.

[WallFlowerActive]

I am fully aware and don't really give a shit what happens to that house. 
I just want to make sure that person is aware of the facts.

Where I live, as long as one wall off the original house remains for a “remodel”, the house gets taxed like an old house.  Not at the new rate of a new build.  Removing part of a wing built in 1942 of a building isn’t tearing down the White House. 




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Hous...nstruction

[Moon68]

Where I live, as long as one wall off the original house remains for a “remodel”, the house gets taxed like an old house.  Not at the new rate of a new build.  Removing part of a wing built in 1942 of a building isn’t tearing down the White House. 



[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/IMG_1545.jpeg]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Hous...nstruction

Hence the popularity of the cornerstone. One could tear down and entire ramshackle abode and build a nice new home, incorporating an original piece of the foundation (cornerstone) and get the lower taxes.