Jeffrey Epstein files: Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal the 'truth'

[Vermilion]

Except Trump, Trump Jr, Bondi, Patel, Bongino, and Vance have all publicly spoken on a list.

And before we get into a discussion on semantics, I'm not saying he has a list in his diary labeled "blackmail client list", but rather evidence that could implicate people.

One interview, Trump said that the island was a cesspool, and if you don't believe him, just ask Prince Andrew.

So if people are insisting it's a coverup, it's because many in the admin have used this theory to their political advantage, and now people are stupid, weaklings, and disloyal if they just don't take the same government officials at their word who stoked this fire. 

So if they're the most transparent administration, why aren't they all apologizing for helping create a story that ended up to be false? Wouldn't they be the ones who created the hoax?

Remember that interview Bondi did with John Roberts 17 days into her job as AG?

Roberts: DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients? Will that really happen?

Bondi: It is sitting on my desk right now for review. That's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that, I'm reviewing the JFK files, the MLK files. That's all in the process of being reviewed because that was done at the directive of the President to all of these agencies.

Roberts: Have you seen anything that you said "Oh my gosh!"?

Bondi: Not yet.

That was the only reference to Epstein.
That’s it.
She didn’t know crap about those files yet and admitted exactly that, in addition to JFK and MLK files.
She absolutely owns the influencer binder fiasco and is taking the heat, rightfully so.
When you’re the boss, you get the praise, and the blame.
It’s been months now and it’s found it’s a nothing burger.
There’s no list.
Some people are having a coronary because some reason is keeping them from looking at the facts.
For some it’s their TDS.
For some it’s because they think they were told something they were not told.
For others it’s because the media told them what to think.

[k0rn]

If you questions about Epstein then Trump doesn’t want your support…

Calls us weaklings…

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump...3348237352

How nice of him.  Dude has gone off the rails on this one.

[RichardHurt]

Remember that interview Bondi did with John Roberts 17 days into her job as AG?

Roberts: DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients? Will that really happen?

Bondi: It is sitting on my desk right now for review. That's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that, I'm reviewing the JFK files, the MLK files. That's all in the process of being reviewed because that was done at the directive of the President to all of these agencies.

Roberts: Have you seen anything that you said "Oh my gosh!"?

Bondi: Not yet.

That was the only reference to Epstein.
That’s it.
She didn’t know crap about those files yet and admitted exactly that, in addition to JFK and MLK files.
She absolutely owns the influencer binder fiasco and is taking the heat, rightfully so.
When you’re the boss, you get the praise, and the blame.
It’s been months now and it’s found it’s a nothing burger.
There’s no list.
Some people are having a coronary because some reason is keeping them from looking at the facts.
For some it’s their TDS.
For some it’s because they think they were told something they were not told.
For others it’s because the media told them what to think.

Pam Bondi made the statement about "tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn" at the White House back in May.
I think you forgot this tiny little bit right meow.

[CriticalStinker]

Some people are having a coronary because some reason is keeping them from looking at the facts.
For some it’s their TDS.
For some it’s because they think they were told something they were not told.
For others it’s because the media told them what to think.

Or maybe it's because most of the public facing admin stoked this story and magically said there's nothing there while calling people stupid for believing them in the first place.

They've changed their story multiple times too, so how could we trust them. First there was nothing, then it was all manufactured, now it's all hoax. They're lying, you cant dress it up.

[imitator]

Are you for releasing a list of names of people who have not been charged with any crime?

But that’s not what we’re talking about.
We’re talking about a high-profile, convicted sex trafficker... and a well known trafficking ring with names buried to protect the powerful.

If the client list includes Trump, should the public have the right to see it?

It’s a simple question.
Yes = truth matters.
No = you’re defending a cover-up.
Pick one.

[Vermilion]

Pam Bondi made the statement about "tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn" at the White House back in May.
I think you forgot this tiny little bit right meow.

I was specifically talking about the John Roberts interview 17 days into her job because that exchange I posted is the one a lot of people are misinterpreting.
You should reread that post until it makes sense.

[Vermilion]

But that’s not what we’re talking about.
We’re talking about a high-profile, convicted sex trafficker... and a well known trafficking ring with names buried to protect the powerful.

If the client list includes Trump, should the public have the right to see it?

It’s a simple question.
Yes = truth matters.
No = you’re defending a cover-up.
Pick one.

I noticed you didn’t answer my question comrade….



Are you for releasing a list of names of people who have not been charged with any crime?

[imitator]

I noticed you didn’t answer my question comrade….



Are you for releasing a list of names of people who have not been charged with any crime?

You already know my answer, I'm for transparency... not mob justice.

It’s not about publishing random names. It’s about exposing who was connected to a convicted sex trafficker... names the system buried to protect the powerful.

Now answer the real question:
Should the public know who was involved or should that stay hidden forever?

It’s a simple question.
Yes = truth matters.
No = you’re defending a cover-up.
Pick one.

[Vermilion]

This all reeks to high heaven.

Release the files, Trump.

If you are not in there extensively 

You have nothing to fear.

And not doing so.

Well, that just screams guilt in spades.

Especially so after the claims already made.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...rgwerg.jpg]

You think there’s a coverup, by Trump, of a case that’s been going on since 1998 and you think there’s some form of criminal list that would still be there????

Please help it make sense.

[Vermilion]

You already know my answer, I'm for transparency... not mob justice.

It’s not about publishing random names. It’s about exposing who was connected to a convicted sex trafficker... names the system buried to protect the powerful.

Now answer the real question:
Should the public know who was involved or should that stay hidden forever?

It’s a simple question.
Yes = truth matters.
No = you’re defending a cover-up.
Pick one.

Releasing names on some list is giving them over to the mob.
Mob justice is not due process.


I trust that case has been gone over with a fine tooth comb since 1998 and any credible evidence of wrongdoing has been adjudicated.
Did Bill Clinton get a happy ending at that island?
Maybe, maybe not.
Zero evidence of it though.