James Comey Indicited

[quintessentone]

Your movement is called Satan?

Mine, I pledge alliegence to the United States of America as a citizen, calling out the BS and posting the truth

Well, it's obvious there is no critical thinking here, so I'll continue with my quest to call out BS and post the truth as most people see it.

[quintessentone]

And there it is again ... foreigner calling for political violence in America.
Like I said before ... pretty damn disgusting.  

Your toxic manipulation won't work. I am for peaceful protesting against fascism, wannbe kings, oligarchs, authoritarians and dictators. Trump fits into a few of those. It's a good thing to protest these types of leaders and get them impeached.

What is disgusting is being pro Trump and his oligarch friends, who now have been identified as travelling to Epstein Island, and we all know what went on there.

[Waterglass]

​​​​ 
OMG ... 
  ​​​​​​​

I should send him an application

[Waterglass]

No, AI and my independent searches are correct. There is no one organized group, there are many factions to the movement that protests fascism, oligarchy, dictatorship, wanna be kings, authoritarian wannabes, etc. It is a good thing.

WRONG

I can only hope that you dont worship that "other" guy!

[quintessentone]

WRONG

I can only hope that you dont worship that "other" guy!

Worship? Is that word descriptive of what you do? Nobody uses that word here when referring to politics. Very odd.

[quintessentone]

The difference between Biden indictments and Trump indictments:

"So Democratic administrations have clearly gone further in charging their political opponents, at least as things stand. But just because the scale is different doesn’t mean it’s inherently more politicized. Put plainly: If you and your allies committed more alleged crimes or pushed the limits more, you would expect there to be more criminal charges.
 And the record shows that, when charges were brought against Trump and his allies, they were overwhelmingly successful. They resulted in convictions or guilty pleas in the vast majority of cases – nearly a dozen in total, including prosecutions stemming from the Mueller investigation in Trump’s first term. The one big exception was the prosecution of Tom Barrack, in which he was acquitted.
 
Those convictions include, of course, Trump himself, who’s maintained no wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty in all cases against him. He was found guilty of 34 felony counts in the one indictment that actually went to trial, the hush money case in New York.
 
And the federal charges against Trump that never went to trial also dealt with issues that even some Republicans regarded as very serious.

-----
 
It remains to be seen whether the charges against Comey, who maintains his innocence, wind up being successful. He’s charged with perjury and obstruction of a congressional proceeding, stemming from 2020 testimony in which he stood by his denials of authorizing leaks.
 
But it’s worth emphasizing that others have looked at such issues with Comey and didn’t seem to think they rose to the level of charges.
 
There is some uncertainty about precisely what Comey’s alleged false statements pertained to.
 
CNN reported Friday that officials and people involved in the case said the alleged leak involved an investigation into Hillary Clinton. CNN’s Jake Tapper reported that the individual whom Comey allegedly authorized to leak information was Columbia law professor Daniel Richman.
 
But documents declassified earlier this year by the FBI showed it probed the issue in 2017. Those documents said Richman denied Comey asked him to talk to the media and concluded, “The investigation has not yielded sufficient evidence to criminally charge any person, including Comey or Richman, with making false statements or with the substantive offenses under investigation.” (The Comey indictment doesn’t accuse Richman of wrongdoing.)
 
It also remains possible the person Comey allegedly leaked to was former deputy FBI Director Andy McCabe, who is now a CNN contributor. But a DOJ inspector general in 2018 examined Comey’s original comments denying authorizing leaks and found that, at least vis-à-vis McCabe, “the overwhelming weight of that evidence supported Comey’s version.”
 
------

Why the Comey indictment is different from the Biden DOJ’s indictment of Trump

[Waterglass]

Worship? Is that word descriptive of what you do? Nobody uses that word here when referring to politics. Very odd.

Worship? Gee Wookie WRONG again as odd is ODD ! 

 

The worship of politics is a phenomenon where political ideologies, movements, or leaders are elevated to a quasi-religious status, replacing traditional religious faith with a new source of meaning and identity. This can take the form of civil religion, cults of personality, or political ideologies that exhibit characteristics of religious belief. 
Politics as a replacement religion
Some commentators suggest that as traditional religion recedes in some societies, politics is filling the void by providing adherents with a sense of purpose, community, and moral direction. 
Creates new divides: In this process, political allegiance can become a core aspect of a person's identity, leading to intense political polarization. These partisan divisions can lead to increased emotional hostility toward those with different views, where members of opposing parties are viewed with distrust and dislike.
Encourages tribalism: With a greater focus on political identity, society can sort into partisan "tribes" that prioritize loyalty over individual beliefs. This can cause people to grow intolerant of differences among allies and see politics as an "us versus them" battle.
Assigns magical powers: A quasi-religious view of politics can lead to a perception that political leaders or parties have magical powers to solve all problems. This can result in deep disappointment and vilification when leaders fail to meet impossibly high standards.

[quintessentone]

Worship? Gee Wookie WRONG again as odd is ODD ! 

 

The worship of politics is a phenomenon where political ideologies, movements, or leaders are elevated to a quasi-religious status, replacing traditional religious faith with a new source of meaning and identity. This can take the form of civil religion, cults of personality, or political ideologies that exhibit characteristics of religious belief. 
Politics as a replacement religion
Some commentators suggest that as traditional religion recedes in some societies, politics is filling the void by providing adherents with a sense of purpose, community, and moral direction. 
Creates new divides: In this process, political allegiance can become a core aspect of a person's identity, leading to intense political polarization. These partisan divisions can lead to increased emotional hostility toward those with different views, where members of opposing parties are viewed with distrust and dislike.
Encourages tribalism: With a greater focus on political identity, society can sort into partisan "tribes" that prioritize loyalty over individual beliefs. This can cause people to grow intolerant of differences among allies and see politics as an "us versus them" battle.
Assigns magical powers: A quasi-religious view of politics can lead to a perception that political leaders or parties have magical powers to solve all problems. This can result in deep disappointment and vilification when leaders fail to meet impossibly high standards.

Maybe from now on I will use it to refer to cult MAGA and cult LEFTIST because of the tribalism aspect, which really only pertains to those two sides. Wait. Quasi-religious too? That would identify the Christian Nationalists who are Christians in name only. So thank you for the reference, it will come in handy in future discussions.

[FlyersFan]

 I am for peaceful protesting against fascism, wannbe kings, oligarchs, authoritarians and dictators. 

If that were true then you would be against Antifa because they use violence for to push a political agenda.
Instead, you say they are a good thing.    
So either you don't know what you are talking about, or you are not telling the truth.
It's one or the other.

[FlyersFan]

Sounds like you're not really saying he's an idiot, just that he acted in a way you don't like.

He lied under oath to congress.  It's a crime.
He had classified/sensitive documents from the FBI that he wasn't supposed to have.
He leaked sensitive information to the press all to further his political agenda.
He had a position of trust for the American people and he betrayed it.
He, and his minions, destroyed the reputation of the FBI by their partisan actions.

Not exactly things a smart person would do.