Is this true? misinformation or honest assesments of facts

[Byrd]

 Well, something is very wrong with China, they have stopped publishing the cremation figures, just like they have in the West. I am calling this a depopulation event being undertaken by various governments throughout the world. The doomsayers are calling the tsunami of deaths have arrived in China as the first country in the kick off. They got away with it in China.  Death Wave Strikes China! Crematoriums Overloaded, Graves Multiply Rapidly

It could also be a cultural preference AGAINST cremation.  Cremation is becoming more common in the US, though: https://www.npr.org/2022/05/11/109819264...s-on-death

Someone seems to be tracking it, and there's an upward trend though no huge leaps: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/funera...0in%201986.

Also, the only proof of this is someone's video?  People with videos lie and spread misinformation all the time.  Do you have any better evidence than YouTube Guy?

[chr0naut]

   Turbo cancers young people dropping dead must be the new normal now,

Cancer rates have continued the downward trend that started just prior to the 1990's.

Cancer rates by year searchable database - World Health Organization

incomplete pregnancies and countries failing to keep their populations stable

Birth rates have also been reducing at fairly consistent rates since the 2000's. There's no bump in the curve after 2019.

World Birth Rate 1950-2025

will eventually have an effect that will severely disrupt your life. and you probably won't even notice because it wasn't on the telly.

Very few statistical tables have ever been shown on TV. It's not really engaging content.

I'm also fairly sure that slight wiggles in the birth rate trend curves will not actually disrupt my life in any way, because I'm old, now.

[annonentity]

Cancer rates have continued the downward trend that started just prior to the 1990's.

Cancer rates by year searchable database - World Health Organization


Birth rates have also been reducing at fairly consistent rates since the 2000's. There's no bump in the curve after 2019.

World Birth Rate 1950-2025


Very few statistical tables have ever been shown on TV. It's not really engaging content.

I'm also fairly sure that slight wiggles in the birth rate trend curves will not actually disrupt my life in any way, because I'm old, now.



If a contrived depopulation event was occurring with government approval i doubt that they would put any statistics out which confirmed it as a fact.

[Kwaka]

Lot of medications blur the boundaries between chemistry, nanotech and biology. More so with vaccinations and their mix of ingredients.

I don't know enough about the microscopic world to comment on fact, fiction or what part of both it is. Really need an insider with access to all the data, batches and what is going on to help navigate it.

With the pandemic of chronic illness going on, something has gone wonky. I do like Liz Gunn and Andrew Bridgerton with the hard questions they have asked so far.

[annonentity]

Lot of medications blur the boundaries between chemistry, nanotech and biology. More so with vaccinations and their mix of ingredients.

I don't know enough about the microscopic world to comment on fact, fiction or what part of both it is. Really need an insider with access to all the data, batches and what is going on to help navigate it.

With the pandemic of chronic illness going on, something has gone wonky. I do like Liz Gunn and Andrew Bridgerton with the hard questions they have asked so far.

There is obviously a massive amount of misinformation around, coming from the pros and the cons of the vaccine issue. Plus, just about every other issue that you can find on the internet. You can find a so-called expert with all the right credentials saying the complete opposite of another with exactly the same credentials.
 The individual trying to make a reasonable assessment of what is going down can only look dispassionately at what he or she sees and come to their own conclusions. A red flag is that what was once freely available statistical information is no longer freely available. Nothing is black and white .

[UltraBudgie]

Lot of medications blur the boundaries between chemistry, nanotech and biology. More so with vaccinations and their mix of ingredients.

This is understandable because biology is nanotechnology implemented with chemistry. I suppose the argument that it's not would be based on intent, that technology is something that is deliberately created, but that doesn't seem provable or disprovable.

The individual trying to make a reasonable assessment of what is going down can only look dispassionately at what he or she sees and come to their own conclusions.

I would argue that is not the only thing one can do. In the situation you describe, where there is unclear, disputed, or lacking evidence, one can also collect data by hypothesizing, acting in accordance with that hypothesis, and gauging results. For example, are certain foods bad for you? Instead of spending all day researching and sifting through conflicting and biased information, simply try changing your diet and see if there's any noticeable difference. The results may not be "objective", but they can certainly be useful. You don't even have to buy in to any particular theory or belief system to see the benefits. In fact I think this approach is widely applicable. Something something post-truth world.

[chr0naut]

If there was a "contrived depopulation event" in a country, then numerous enemy countries, aid agencies, independent news media, NGO's, and welfare organizations would advertise the fact.

[chr0naut]

Lot of medications blur the boundaries between chemistry, nanotech and biology. More so with vaccinations and their mix of ingredients.

I don't know enough about the microscopic world to comment on fact, fiction or what part of both it is. Really need an insider with access to all the data, batches and what is going on to help navigate it.

With the pandemic of chronic illness going on, something has gone wonky. I do like Liz Gunn and Andrew Bridgerton with the hard questions they have asked so far.

Nanotech is chemistry. Chemistry is nanotech. Nano refers to the scale 10^-9. Nanotech is technology that occurs at that scale. It is the same scale as chemistry for most molecules.

[chr0naut]

There is obviously a massive amount of misinformation around, coming from the pros and the cons of the vaccine issue. Plus, just about every other issue that you can find on the internet. You can find a so-called expert with all the right credentials saying the complete opposite of another with exactly the same credentials.
 The individual trying to make a reasonable assessment of what is going down can only look dispassionately at what he or she sees and come to their own conclusions. A red flag is that what was once freely available statistical information is no longer freely available. Nothing is black and white .

No, tens of billions of people have had the vaccines. If they were toxic, we should see a lot of bodies, like in the billions. We just don't.

If the effects are subtle and only affect very few, them what's all the doom porn over?

We know that there are more dangerous stuffs sold as food and drinks.

[Kwaka]

Nanotech is chemistry. Chemistry is nanotech. Nano refers to the scale 10^-9. Nanotech is technology that occurs at that scale. It is the same scale as chemistry for most molecules.

Yes. Quantum mechanics is a big part in how it all interacts and getting it to do what you want. Where nano tech starts to break off from chemistry is with all the new technology and process building machines at the scale of biology.

These days DNA can be sequenced, send around the world and printed out. More to it than chemistry, synthetic biology. Integrated circuits are getting smaller with work continuing deeper into the quantum realm.

How all this blends in with transhumanism has some worries about where it is all going, how many hard lessons? Where does it end? Evolution will sort it out. Correlation ain't causation? A small increase in disability ain't much. The plan was to reduce disability. When we cannot be honest about it, got trouble all over it.