8 |
209 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
| POINTS: |
428.00 |
| REPUTATION: |
59
|
07-01-2024, 11:22 PM
This post was last modified 07-01-2024, 11:22 PM by VulcanWerks.
Very interesting read on 4chan.
True or not who knows.
My take on the 4chan thread:
They said a lot of things that jive with my observations - there are a lot of smaller craft and some slightly larger ones - many appear to be uncrewed. The idea of them being “here” and kind of omnipresent also aligns with my observations - as does the idea of them being “Zookeepers” though I call them “the watchers”.
I also previously came to the conclusion that they are the ones in control of contact - which the 4chan anon also seems to corroborate.
The “crash retrieval” tied to malfunctions actually aligns with one of my hypothesis but it still seems too simple… they just break down all the time? ? Don’t know but that tracks.
From my own personal encounter, I do agree that they probably aren’t looking to wholesale annihilate us. That would have already happened. My guess, personally, is that they are observing us and the planet to ensure we don’t blow the planet up or render it useless - particularly once we became nuclear capable.
The idea about the ocean being their home makes sense. It aligns with much that has already been discussed.
What seems odd to me is that there is a very large “construction” craft but yet they don’t seem to need the craft for storage - so either production facilities are very large, there are a lot of “them” or maybe there’s actually a LOT of these crafts floating about. Unsure (obviously). Seems odd.
There have been other reports of a large “craft” or “base” that is underwater in the same area but it is abandoned and ancient. So somewhat consistent but different than other reports.
The “genetic” aspect of some of these craft aligns with all kinds of abduction reports, implants, irregular pregnancies, etc. Hybridization has long been theorized but remains murky - could explain why they are here ongoing, however.
The fact that the anon dismissed disks or triangular craft is somewhat odd to me. Either those are “ours” or perhaps the “compartmentalization” was such that they never encountered these other craft. That seems unlikely to me for some reason. Then again, it was framed as being someone who did crash retrieval and not tracking so they may not have insight into all other things. They also mentioned no “ancient” tech being found but again compartmentalization applies here - they don’t know what others are up to. It would probably be a whole different department handling archeology. The archeologists would think they are finding “the truth” - and they are - but it’s only one piece of the puzzle. Very few see the whole mosaic.
This is one of the few anon type posts I’ve seen that doesn’t really muddy the waters too much, largely fits with everything else I’ve researched and does add to the general understanding. It’s either a neat story or it’s genuine - which is guess is obvious - but it was handled in a way that I could buy it.
I say that as I once heard a quote that went something like “it’s not what you know or what you say it’s what you can prove that gets you in trouble” regarding the UFO subject. The anon didn’t violate that or make outrageous claims - which does lend some credibility.
and who was I really talking to that night 
