How to keep people from reading

[ArMaP]

Why should Charlie Chaplin need a copyright 70 years on? I agree with allowing people to benefit from their work but 70 years seems like a ridiculous amount of time.

It wasn't 70 years after the creator's death at the time, I think it was something like 50 years after creation, so he was still alive when his first movies reached 50 years.

And you missed my point that we can have 70+ year old works that are "flagged" for illegality solely on the basis that "the computer" thinks its a copy.

I didn't miss it, I just decided not to comment on that. Any computer decision should be confirmed by a person that really knows about the topic and the legal implications.

Are you skeptic? You sure sound like him.

Who are you talking about?