Hendricus G Loos, Master of Mind Control

[ReturnofBroccoli]

My main question: in order to brainwash or to induct is it ALWAYS necessary to establish rapport or is there a new approach that can circumvent that quickly?

[sahgwa]

The scariest ones are engrained suggestions so deep they think it's their own thoughts and ideas .  I really wish he had written the book after COVID so he could use some of the straight up creepy repetitive slogans, and robotic talking heads as examples.
Not even getting into the technological part of it with possible entrainment frequencies and use of the injections, which seem to have made everyone much more emotional.

[Byrd]

I have done a tremendous amount of research on this project on the original ATS thread and have carried out several Homebrew experiments to prove the mechanisms involved.

long story short blue light messes with your potassium ion channels and peripheral nerve endings and yellow orange light messes with your sodium ion channels. Control those ion channels and you control the man

Mind control?  No freakin' way. 

Ever.

Given just how diverse humanity is, you won't find something that works on everyone.  Even common drugs (take ibuprofen, for example) doesn't work the same on any two people.  Hubby is bigger than me, but two ibuprofen will fix most of his pains.  I'm smaller (so two should have a bigger impact on me) but two will barely touch my pain.

On a microscopic level (where blood vessels and nerves are) the differences are even wilder.  You might target one specific cell (Cell A) that's on the skin of someone's fingertip.  That same cell may be absent in another person or in a different location.  Ion channels -- again, very variable.  You might get some sort of vague blanket effect, but I can guarantee that it won't be the same for everyone and that there's a lot of people that it won't affect (or will have a minimal effect on.)


Point of reference:  I taught human anatomy labs at the university and taught human biology at a high school.

[sahgwa]

Mind control?  No freakin' way. 

Ever.

Given just how diverse humanity is, you won't find something that works on everyone.  Even common drugs (take ibuprofen, for example) doesn't work the same on any two people.  Hubby is bigger than me, but two ibuprofen will fix most of his pains.  I'm smaller (so two should have a bigger impact on me) but two will barely touch my pain.

On a microscopic level (where blood vessels and nerves are) the differences are even wilder.  You might target one specific cell (Cell A) that's on the skin of someone's fingertip.  That same cell may be absent in another person or in a different location.  Ion channels -- again, very variable.  You might get some sort of vague blanket effect, but I can guarantee that it won't be the same for everyone and that there's a lot of people that it won't affect (or will have a minimal effect on.)


Point of reference:  I taught human anatomy labs at the university and taught human biology at a high school.

Yes people are vastly differing, and mind control is vastly differing; no one size fits all technique exists. It's more of a numbers game, like shooting fish in a barrel. This brings me back to the video Quintessentone posted today, about resonance. You dont need everyone's DNA to get other people's DNA, you don't need to brainwash everyone to get a result, you only need a set amount, and the rest resonate along with it, or remove themselves/get removed from the system...

I learnt an interesting fact, something like only 2 or 3 in 10 are hypnotisable. Some small percentage.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

Yes people are vastly differing, and mind control is vastly differing; no one size fits all technique exists. It's more of a numbers game, like shooting fish in a barrel. This brings me back to the video Quintessentone posted today, about resonance. You dont need everyone's DNA to get other people's DNA, you don't need to brainwash everyone to get a result, you only need a set amount, and the rest resonate along with it, or remove themselves/get removed from the system...

I learnt an interesting fact, something like only 2 or 3 in 10 are hypnotisable. Some small percentage.

You have to believe its possible to be hypnotized but you also need rapport with the subject/patient/brainwashee/ whatever

[dashen]

Mind control?  No freakin' way. 

Ever.

Given just how diverse humanity is, you won't find something that works on everyone.  Even common drugs (take ibuprofen, for example) doesn't work the same on any two people.  Hubby is bigger than me, but two ibuprofen will fix most of his pains.  I'm smaller (so two should have a bigger impact on me) but two will barely touch my pain.

On a microscopic level (where blood vessels and nerves are) the differences are even wilder.  You might target one specific cell (Cell A) that's on the skin of someone's fingertip.  That same cell may be absent in another person or in a different location.  Ion channels -- again, very variable.  You might get some sort of vague blanket effect, but I can guarantee that it won't be the same for everyone and that there's a lot of people that it won't affect (or will have a minimal effect on.)


Point of reference:  I taught human anatomy labs at the university and taught human biology at a high school.

Not literal mind control. Just manipulation of brainwave frequency and control of the sodium potassium ion pathways of the peripheral nervous system

[dashen]

Okay, it's like mood and brainwave activity control.

[sahgwa]

My main question: in order to brainwash or to induct is it ALWAYS necessary to establish rapport or is there a new approach that can circumvent that quickly?

I wouldn't really call using extreme techniques like MK ULTRA and previous did, as 'rapport' lol
Have you heard of the Skinner box? 
Keeping people in sensory deprivation and 'psychic driving' via breaking down existing personalities to create new ones is very traumatic.
They are inducing 'shamanic' traumatic experiences to 'crack the cosmic egg' in a lot of cases.

[Byrd]

Not literal mind control. Just manipulation of brainwave frequency and control of the sodium potassium ion pathways of the peripheral nervous system

That's not how it works-- otherwise you could wake someone up from a coma with an infusion of sodium potassium.

Yes, you might make them more hypervigilant but you're not going to be able to influence them to do anything.

(If you could make them feel drowsy, then run out and patent a device and make billions helping people with insomnia.)

[Byrd]

Yes people are vastly differing, and mind control is vastly differing; no one size fits all technique exists. It's more of a numbers game, like shooting fish in a barrel. This brings me back to the video Quintessentone posted today, about resonance. You dont need everyone's DNA to get other people's DNA, you don't need to brainwash everyone to get a result, you only need a set amount, and the rest resonate along with it, or remove themselves/get removed from the system...

I learnt an interesting fact, something like only 2 or 3 in 10 are hypnotisable. Some small percentage.

It would be more like shooting fish in the ocean to find that one person that you could manipulate.  You might make them more or less hypervigilant, you could make their reactions slower.  But getting someone to cooperate is partly the act of getting their dopamine levels to respond to certain things.  And ion channels won't do that.