04-11-2025, 02:42 PM
(04-11-2025, 01:52 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: I think it's just where views line up and where people think they line up...
Like the question on corporations duty is to serve the shareholders. I click "agree." I got that far right with darwinian capitalism that, while free, allows for multinational to outsource for their profit margin.
So it puts me "technically" further right then most that would criticism me. I just feel survival of the economic fittest, even without strict anti-trust laws still arrive at the most natural and productive framework. Even if it shift labor overseas and cuts jobs for automation.
That same "HANDS OFF ECONOMIC APPROACH" (on topic again) can be applied to civil liberties, and even immigration. The minimally regulated is the minimally regulated, be it life or greedy global capitalism. My globalism and antiprotectionism puts me where I am.
And the only thing that brings me the least bit left is
my position to use higher taxes to fund social programs, and even museums, but not really shedding tears for public radio. Higher taxes and less regulation is my trade off for lower taxes and protectionism.
It's not really a conundrum after you extricate yourself from the sphere of American politics.
Well, it is from Australia is it not, I had one or two strong opinions but thats it.
For better or worse we still operate in the sphere of American politics, everything is skewed. Even my Isidewith profile didn't seem to fit me and I think that had misleading answers plus it gets so in-depth.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart