Follow The Silenced

[SurferSoul]

Then we have the ideal opportunity to test how people respond to authoritarian measures and how they police themselves. The ultimate pay-op to see in real time in real life how people behave and how their behaviour can be manipulated. I think that bit when far better than they expected. 
 
Then there is the virus itself, whether or not it was as deadly as claimed, it was an ideal opportunity to test out the above. Even if it was a deadly engineered virus in the wild it would soon revert to being an ordinary cold after a short period of time. Either it was unleashed on China or China released it on their own population. Because of China’s policy’s it happens to be the ideal country for such an outbreak. Why would China release it on their own population? Well because of the economic collapse I mentioned earlier. China already an authoritarian state wouldn’t risk millions of unemployed starving people finally overthrowing the regime in power. Also they are much further down the road of keeping the population under the boot, so it was the best example for the rest of the world to follow. Besides they could claim it was a natural outbreak from the wet market like they did initially, or say it was a lab leak like they did later. Either way it was accidental. 
 
I’ll get on to my theory of the jabs later. Oh and it’s not my theory’s per se, just info I’ve gathered from others and what I think is most likely.

[SurferSoul]

Ok so about the so called vaccines, first of all the manufacturers were given indemnity, a very worrying mandate right of the bat. Especially when we consider the huge fines that some had paid previously for vaccine injuries. Moderna hadn’t even brought anything to the public before this and were making a loss. The MRNA tech proposed and used had only been trialled on animals before with very poor results. But MRNA was regarded as the way forward and possibly the future of all vaccines. 

Putting that aside something was needed to make the masses feel safe again and at least safe enough to get back on with their lives. Because the psy-op part had worked far better than expected, even a placebo would have sufficed. Because it was unknown the extent of damage the MRNA vacs would cause and because it was impossible to manufacture such quantities in the limited time, the majority were saline shots. However a certain percentage were the real deal. These were distributed widely so the public wouldn’t wise up to the dangers and so any reactions could be blamed on something else. 
Remember this was a vaccine trial dished out on the unwitting public. 

not only would they get to see how this experimental bio tech worked in real life, in real time, they got to make huge profits because the lackeys in the government would pay for it all. A win win all round. 

Basically everyone (except the plebs) got what they wanted ultimately. 

The WEF and Bilderberg attendees got to make huge profits on top of their vast wealth. 
Big pharma got to test new and controversial bio tech and also make huge profits.
Govertments got their wet dream of being authoritarian control freaks and selling out the public big time. (BTW some were against this until they got their tails wagged).

and last but certainly not least an economic crash, possibly collapse was averted and TPTB didn’t have to worry about the following chaos and being hung from the gallows as a result.

So you see, it all made perfect sense from a certain privileged perspective.

[UltraBudgie]

I seem to remember some study from Australia showing different results for different batches of the vaccine? Has that been debunked yet? Or is there any evidence that some shots were saline?

The economic theory may make circumstantial sense, but is there a theory about what the mechanism of the theorized collapse would have been? Or evidence of how Covid spending averted it?

I like the theories, and maybe they're right, but I suspect that even if they're right they wrong, and even if there's evidence there isn't, so well what does it really matter?

[LightAngel]

 
Your intuition is as good an anything, often the best judge and advisor we have. 
 

I agree!

I also agree with many of your thoughts, and I have a question for you.

What can we do to stop all this madness?


Our weapons are words and common sense and truth - their weapons can kill and destroy our planet!

Their greed and corruption, and their lack of conscience is a weapon in itself.

So, how can we stop this?

[SurferSoul]

I agree!

I also agree with many of your thoughts, and I have a question for you.

What can we do to stop all this madness?


Our weapons are words and common sense and truth - their weapons can kill and destroy our planet!

Their greed and corruption, and their lack of conscience is a weapon in itself.

So, how can we stop this?

You’re asking the wrong person. 

The only thing I can imagine is a shift in consciousness, people’s values and attitudes need to change. You state our weapons are words and common sense. Covid proved common sense goes out of the window when fear takes hold. Words are only powerful on receptive minds. 

So a paradigm shift is needed, people have been fed propaganda their entire lives, before them their parents were and on it goes. 

I think it boils down to people following the herd, once enough people change their behaviour and attitudes the rest follow. 

I think that covid was a bit of a shot in the foot for those that orchestrated it. Except for the true believers, far more people are aware than before. But like you and me, they don’t know what to do about it.

[SurferSoul]

I seem to remember some study from Australia showing different results for different batches of the vaccine? Has that been debunked yet? Or is there any evidence that some shots were saline?

The economic theory may make circumstantial sense, but is there a theory about what the mechanism of the theorized collapse would have been? Or evidence of how Covid spending averted it?

I like the theories, and maybe they're right, but I suspect that even if they're right they wrong, and even if there's evidence there isn't, so well what does it really matter?

I will get back to you later, but I won’t be providing links and supporting evidence. I’m not a journalist and my time is precious, this would take a whole book or better yet a documentary to put it together. 

But if you’re interested in the psychology and manipulation, then I would suggest viewing the Adam Curtis documentary’s as a good start. 

Right now I’m off to enjoy this sunny Sunday

[Kwaka]

What can we do to stop all this madness?

Come to terms that we are not going to stop it all. Earth has been a crazy place long before we got here and will continue long after we leave. While we are here, chip away where we can, do not consent to the crazy, help inform where you can in navigating it. Time will sort it out.

[Kwaka]

I seem to remember some study from Australia showing different results for different batches of the vaccine? Has that been debunked yet? Or is there any evidence that some shots were saline?

How Bad is My Batch

One site with some resources looking into some of the data. AstraZeneca got banned in Australia due to too many clots. All the batches do have different results with all the medical experimentation going on. As for getting record level to all the data has been challenging.

I find it unlikely that saline was used in the general public rollout. Maybe in some of the political promo videos to sell the jab? There where some rumors at the time of the rollout that some people in the supply chain knew it was trouble and turned of the freezers to start the mRNA degradation and reduce the overall toxicity. I cannot prove it, maybe some batches?

[SurferSoul]

How Bad is My Batch

One site with some resources looking into some of the data. AstraZeneca got banned in Australia due to too many clots. All the batches do have different results with all the medical experimentation going on. As for getting record level to all the data has been challenging.

I find it unlikely that saline was used in the general public rollout. Maybe in some of the political promo videos to sell the jab? There where some rumors at the time of the rollout that some people in the supply chain knew it was trouble and turned of the freezers to start the mRNA degradation and reduce the overall toxicity. I cannot prove it, maybe some batches?

Good points, the reason I believe saline was used are because this was an an experimental treatment, it didn’t get properly trialed and I seriously doubt they could manufacture and deliver the MRNA to all those people within the timescale. 
I know with cancer patients receiving immunotherapy, the drugs are manufactured on the day of treatment or the final ingredients are added at the last minute so to speak because the the solution can’t be stored for any length of time for it to be effective.

Also consider the absolute chaos if everyone who took the shots had serious side effects? All those responsible would face some serious reckonings! 

I also have family members who took the shot and they are doing ok.

Then again I must admit everyone reacts different to these shots, some people can have serious side effects including death, others have no reaction at all. In the later cases the drugs don’t work for them either usually. 

Whatever the truth is, it was a crime to give, no coerce people into to taking these potentially deadly shots for flu like virus the majority could get over on their own. 

Oh and that bit about getting young people to take to save granny was disgusting. The last thing these total psychopaths care about is the elderly. Just look at what they did to the nursing homes!

[sahgwa]

That is a very good point on saline shots.  The net has been very well scrubbed the last 5 years especially, but I recall some nurses saying they discovered their shots were saline and then some MSM stories about batches going bad? (Maybe they were discovered to be saline). 
Also ties in with control groups/ placebo vs actual results/ batch numbers and levels of mRNA, spike protein etc.

As far as what can we do?
As alluded to before, it's all about behaviour.

I will never forget the nonsense with masks in our office, and how everyone knows it doesn't stop you from getting sick.  The whole, 'you don't need it sitting down but when you stand up OH LOOK OUT the virus will get you!' nonsense was finally too much. So we had a meeting in the break room ('more ventilation' lol) so I am like fuk this control shet, I am not wearing a face diaper to walk 6 feet then sit down and take it off again. So I just walked over and sat down like normal and just having the 'courage' to be normal made every single other person in the company 'break the rules' and go over there without one.  They were too docile/scared to even say anything, just look around confused for validation with peers. So I started a positive trend (yes I am killing grandma). Then when the boss showed up with one on , being the only one he felt idiotic lol

Point being, it's about leading by example, and having conviction, and being kind.  No anger, no hubris, and no pushing.  If people don't get it, they don't get it. I have seen too many automatic-snap-backs of brainwashing erupting in a spout of anger. It's fascinating and sad but a lot of people's heads are really done in.
Keep smiling and 'being normal' and you get through to a lot of people.