Erika Kirk In Romania

[rickymouse]

Exactly. Remember when the pizza-people were all up in arms about the Clintons "child trafficking in Haiti"?

https://www.clintonfoundationtimeline.co...-in-haiti/

Hilary was just trying to help because she and her husband love children! Especially orphans. Yet the evil right tried to turn that into something bad...

The Clintons, just like most politicians and rich people, do stuff like that for personal gain, to make themselves look better.  To gain people's support for what they sell...they often are selling themselves to gain what they desire

[Kwaka]

Have heard of these theories, I don't know. 

Generally how this evil works is to accuse others of what one is guilty of. Who has made these claims? Some internet rumor with no substance. Did Laura Sibyl from the Haiti ring that Clinton cleared actually take over the national security child protection code? 

When the adrenochrome CYM went down,  the USA child protection system is a mess. The system is so divided and fractured that no one really knows what is going on. By purpose from this perspective.

[Sirius]

Exactly. Remember when the pizza-people were all up in arms about the Clintons "child trafficking in Haiti"?

https://www.clintonfoundationtimeline.co...-in-haiti/

Hilary was just trying to help because she and her husband love children! Especially orphans. Yet the evil right tried to turn that into something bad...

.

.

.

[UltraBudgie]

[Image: https://media0.giphy.com/media/TDMbOHni0.../giphy.gif]
.
[Image: https://media0.giphy.com/media/3s3KfG6MFtASQ/giphy.gif]
.
[Image: https://media0.giphy.com/media/5zh1j8sUf.../giphy.gif]
.

i mean i would hope that was obvious enough that it would be read as sarcasm fairly clearly. dang i really need ip to give more demonstrations of how to sarcasm clearly. i should probably just avoid the stuff all together.

[Kwaka]

i mean i would hope that was obvious enough that it would be read as sarcasm .... i should probably just avoid the stuff all together.

Sarcasm on this topic is thin ice. Avoid is a good recommendation.,

[Sirius]

i mean i would hope that was obvious enough that it would be read as sarcasm fairly clearly. dang i really need ip to give more demonstrations of how to sarcasm clearly. i should probably just avoid the stuff all together.

[Kwaka]

[Image: https://media0.giphy.com/media/gIN6MT17N.../giphy.gif]

I get it. Hard to restrain a WTF. Until one has the evidence or placed in a life threatening situation, what can we do?

[Sirius]

I get it. Hard to restrain a WTF. Until one has the evidence or placed in a life threatening situation, what can we do?

Leave the thread or meet Will I think.

[UltraBudgie]

Generally how this evil works is to accuse others of what one is guilty of. Who has made these claims? Some internet rumor with no substance. Did Laura Sibyl from the Haiti ring that Clinton cleared actually take over the national security child protection code? 

The other tactic beside reflection that is used is poisoned projection. Imagine this: with some actual charitable intent, a politician decides to garner some positive PR by "helping children". Being savvy, they know full-well that some will perceive there to be all sorts of evil nefarious motive to their actions, so they actually keep everything very honest, charitable, and clean, but simply disregard the possibility of negative perception. In some cases, they may even seem to amplify it. So, the blithe accept everything at face value, but the reactionary elements who would not support them anyway, they take the bait. Without actual evidence, only perception, they start screaming about malfeasance, pointing fingers and claiming that it's all just a sham. Evil, evil, burn the witch! Then, since the politicians have actually been very careful to keep everything on the up-and-up, surprise: no supporting evidence is found for their claims. The accusers look like loons. The universe itself, which does have some intrinsic mechanism of justice, bites back upon them: honi soit qui mal y pense.

My favourite and most audacious example of this is the Freemason's CHIP program. Let the Freemasons CHIP your child! They're only trying to help!

Masonic Child Identification Programs (CHIP) are a charitable initiative by North American Masonic lodges to aid in the identification and recovery of missing children. CHIP programs are supported monetarily at the Grand Lodge level, and are staffed by volunteers from subordinate lodges as well as law enforcement and dental professionals.

The CHIP programs allow parents the opportunity to create a kit of identifying materials for their child, free of charge. The kit contains a fingerprint card, a physical description, a VHS tape, computer disk, or DVD of the child, a dental imprint, and a DNA sample. The purpose of the kit is to provide critical information to the public and to law enforcement in the event that a child is reported missing. The program has been lauded by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

The VHS tape or DVD, besides a video capturing appearance and voice, includes data tailored to the child's age group that can assist in finding children who might be missing for reasons besides abduction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masonic_Ch...n_Programs

Why, what a noble endeavour and thoughtful way to help the community.

[Kwaka]

they know full-well that some will perceive there to be all sorts of evil nefarious motive to their actions, so they actually keep everything very honest, charitable, and clean, but simply disregard the possibility of negative perception. 

Yeah, one on the radar for navigating reality. It is how the 'Breaking Bad' story goes. How much righteousness went with 9/11?

To get back on topic with Erika, has that Jackie Kennedy vibe where a lot of the politics is out of her control. Could Charlie be as popular as he was if she was some kind of dark evil bitch? Trust is in short supply these days. I don't know her history.