(03-19-2026, 11:00 AM)LightAngel Wrote: BREAKING: Goldman Unveils Unredacted File That 'Disputes Everything' Trump 'Has Said' About Epstein
During remarks on the House floor, Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) condemned Attorney General Pam Bondi's handling of the Epstein files and displayed files that were "unredacted to Congress."
[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLnU9IWEIgw]
A) Why is this conversation happening now? Which procedure or process brings this topic to the people? In what way does this interfere with, or frustrate Donald Trump?
B) The "explicit" 'release' of these files means these were 1 -not material in the cases they chose to prosecute, and or remain open, 2 - since they were ostensibly reviewed and rejected by 'trained LEOs and officers of the court," we can assume their is no news here?
C) Is this not legacy partisan or spite drama?
D) There appear to be very few "innocents" in these files... (but what would I know)...
except that many still think there is such a thing as "gonna get away with it..." and they demand we believe it too.
E) Is it not ironic that being within the "Epstein" circle was literally lusted after... and now it the opposite?
When will we see the walls of text about Epstein talks about Iran?... clickbait inbound.
Trump is the topic d'jour in Epstein's circles... the peacocking noob.
Epstein's catalogue of 'associated' allegations seems oddly to purpose...
smacks of the whole anti-trump propaganda game that got so big it took on a life of it's own.
These are lawyer games... just shy of calling someone heinous... but the allegations are... so....
activism...
I hate how politician's are directed.
