(08-15-2025, 10:40 PM)Kwaka Wrote: I have seen your video, it is a great presentation going through many of the issues around these released videos.
I am not in a position to say with certainty what videos are legitimate and what ones are not. In the cultural context of when these videos where released, they do align with many other reports and documentation about the gray ET influence on Earth.
I do expect there are a lot of videos and other evidence buried deep in National Security. For anyone deep in this infrastructure would be risking their life in releasing it, to know that it will just get covered up again. How long did it take the government to slap a information blackout on Roswell?
How Youtube has not deleted these videos does add weight to them not being legitimate. Maybe the videos you question are a hoax, but when it comes to what inspired them does hold a lot more legitimacy. Done in a way that keeps everyone safe from National Security blowback while give the public a heads up to the nature of life.
"I have seen your video, it is a great presentation going through many of the issues around these released videos."
Thanks, it took me 9 days in a roll to do it, despite the fact that wasn't "that" difficult. But one thing here and there, and you don't believe how this small corrections take. lol.
"I am not in a position to say with certainty what videos are legitimate and what ones are not. In the cultural context of when these videos where released, they do align with many other reports and documentation about the gray ET influence on Earth."
Yeah, but you don't get to film these things. As I mentioned, a lot of what was proposed was the "UFO folklore" so prominent in ATS. True, I do believe that I have better idea than the average ufologists which are the cases that are bonafied from the ones that are not, I do that observing the patterns. So Roswell, Varginha, and Kecksburg are true for instance. Shag Harbor, true. And so forth. But so many other cases untrue. Skinny Bob middle video, based in the Muroc folklore are shooting out of the way. The language applied, too much MJ 12, that we know now that is a very good and so forth. It looked like a film (I am talking about the 4 videos) that wanted to hook the ATS sort of public, plus others. The language at that period was very advanced, but looking with attention we see that things don't really match. See my point?
"I do expect there are a lot of videos and other evidence buried deep in National Security. For anyone deep in this infrastructure would be risking their life in releasing it, to know that it will just get covered up again. How long did it take the government to slap a information blackout on Roswell?" Man, IMO, ppl who release this stuff dies. End of the story. If learn one thing or 2 about intelligence services, is that parts of them are completely rogue, and if you cross some lines you dead. No questions asked. And that is one of my main points against the other Bob. You know who I mean.
"How Youtube has not deleted these videos does add weight to them not being legitimate."
They don't care, is not their business.
"Maybe the videos you question are a hoax, but when it comes to what inspired them does hold a lot more legitimacy. Done in a way that keeps everyone safe from National Security blowback while give the public a heads up to the nature of life." You want to believe, or you feel inclined to believe that what is behind this video, has actually a good intention to shed light about UFOs.
My point is entirelly different. I am advocating tha since 1973 (at least, more likely since 69) the intelligences (CIA and all the rest) knew that the phenomenon was here to stay, and the maximum they could do was to stir the pot and misdirect ppl, do damage control. So they went against independent research, and founded a culture of leaks and whistleblowers, so much so you don't hear more about independent researchers, or independent cases, there is always someone connected to the establishment to tell us what is and what is not. That is how things have been tied up.