Covid spike protein bad, why would I want the vaccine?

[chr0naut]

I encourage everyone to listen to this speech by Suzanne Humphries.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/...forbidden/

She deals with the Covid jabs around the 32.35 mark. 
Pfizer added to their "special" formula SV 40 which knocks out P 53 which is responsible for suppressing cancer.

The transcription promoter in all mRNA immunizations was first identified in the the genome of the SV40 virus, however, it naturally occurs in all living things and is a part of how RNA is normally transcribed into amino acids in the ribosomes of all living things.

The transcription promoter used in mRNA immunizations is not the SV40 virus. The promoter is also produced naturally in human beings and is common to all living things based upon DNA.

The SV40 viruses Large T antigen does inactivate P53 tumour supression protein. That is why SV40 virus causes cancers, but the transcription promoter does not.

The Sucker Punch-
Radiation
Chemical poisons> More aggressive cancers

Why is she saying this? Based upon what research? She is just saying stuff that sounds shocking and 'sciency', but with no basis in fact.

Bottom line cancer treatments will super charge the SV 40 cancers. These people are evil.

No, they aren't. Because the mRNA medicines do not contain the SV40 virus.

However, the people who promote and sell quercetin supplements to people suffering from cancer to allegedly cure the cancer, are evil, because there are no studies showing any positive effect on cancer, and there are animal studies where quercetin has caused an increase in estrogenic cancers.

The 'Childrens Health Defence' organization, the one this woman is the mouthpiece for, extensively promotes the use of quercetin - for children!

https://rumble.com/v580z99-vaxxed-3-and-...-2024.html

This now makes sense why Pfizer has pivoted in a big way to the Oncology field. Certainly not to cure people.
It's a business model.

Pfizer, like all pharmceutical companies, have been heavily involved in oncology for decades. There has been no "pivot".

I find it especially alarming that the pediatric doses have twice the concentration. 

https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html

Why haven't they been pulled
This is strange- if someone by this point has not taken the jab, why would they now, regardless what the CDC recommends?

Because COVID-19 immunizations, provably over the past 5 years, pose no threat.

[chr0naut]

Pfizer itself is not considered a credible medical organization.

They are a pharmacological business.

[chivo]

You see you called them out with the common sense of a no one like me and they rush over to fill up the vacuum of silence with more PR damage control

It works everytime, unlike the garbage vax 
 

[Knows]

The undisputed covered up facts about the vax

The Trillion Dollar Venom Industrial Complex With Dr. Bryan Ardis

[Thoughtful3]

The undisputed covered up facts about the vax

The Trillion Dollar Venom Industrial Complex With Dr. Bryan Ardis

From the horses mouth- Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla's thriller "Moonshot" confirms what most have suspected.

Page 22-  About the decision to go with the mRNA platform. "It would be very risky and complicated bet."

Page 23- "The technology is ideal for something like this. It is fast, and capable of being edited quickly for updates and boosters."
"Mikael knew from previous discussions that the speed of development and the ABILITY TO BOOST FREQUENTLY were very high priorities for me. With a forethought that was sadly correct, I was afraid that by the winter of 2020 we would have a new and probably more lethal wave of Covid-19, as happened with the 1918 influenza pandemic a century ago."

"I also knew that a virus with these characteristics would mutate sooner rather than later."

[Thoughtful3]

Bourla did something most unusual.

Pages 50 - 52.

Pfizer had 4 vaccine candidates running in parallel, and they eventually narrowed it down to 2.
Normally the tests are conducted sequentially.

The first was labeled b1. "This candidate had the most data and appeared to be an excellent choice.. The second [known as b2] was the one that used the full-length spike protein."

"However, b2 was more difficult to produce, and with less overall data available, it was a much riskier choice. Data for the first was further along..."

"Even though there was a lot of white space in the second puzzle, it appeared to be more promising."

"80% of the data we had was from b1, and we couldn't afford to develop additional data for b2."

Guess which one Bourla selected?

"Let's go with the b2 candidate and let's hope we are right."

Billions of lives would be impacted by this decision and he chose the one that had the least amount of data, if that makes sense to anyone.

[DulceEscapee]

And how long after a lot of people were immunized did the pandemic end?

The pandemic didn’t end, it just became endemic. Meaning it cannot be stopped. That doesn’t happen when there is an effective vaccine.

[chr0naut]

The pandemic didn’t end, it just became endemic. Meaning it cannot be stopped. That doesn’t happen when there is an effective vaccine.

Then, using that measure, the only effective vaccine that has ever existed is the smallpox vaccine.

However, the reduction in the rate of mortality of a disease is also another measure. In that regard, most immunizations have been effective.

[Knows]

Then, using that measure, the only effective vaccine that has ever existed is the smallpox vaccine.

However, the reduction in the rate of mortality of a disease is also another measure. In that regard, most immunizations have been effective.

The pandemic was only a pandemic because of the shots. And the centrally controlled treatments allowed in the hospitals. 
Before the shots. No more were dying than previous yearly flu deaths. All flu deaths were said to be Covid - 19. 
It would have never happened if they simply used Nicotine and Chlorine Dioxide.       

[chr0naut]

The pandemic was only a pandemic because of the shots. And the centrally controlled treatments allowed in the hospitals. 
Before the shots. No more were dying than previous yearly flu deaths. All flu deaths were said to be Covid - 19. 
It would have never happened if they simply used Nicotine and Chlorine Dioxide.        [Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmi...7_bash.gif]

You do realize that we can differentiate the genomes of viruses, and that influenza is a whole different family to coronaviruses? And that we have been identifying strains of flu by genomic assay for more than two decades?

Influenza Virus Genome Sequencing and Genetic Characterization - CDC

So, if people are getting sick and dying of a respiratory disease, and they test negative for known pathogens like flu, but there's this new disease that has just been identified, even before you have the genome of the new pathogen, you can still rule out the others.

And only 12 days after COVID-19 was identified in China, its genome was published worldwide, and so it could then be easily and automatically categorized at almost every pathology lab in America.

During the pandemic, deaths from flu continued, and were being measured and counted separately from COVID-19, because the pathogens are so different.

However, during 2018-2019 flu season in the USA the numbers of flu cases were lower than the few years previous. This is not really something unusual, as a lower fluctuation in flu deaths occurred in the 2011-2012 season in the USA (and still no-one has given a full explanation as to why the low might have happened like that in 2012, it seems it just fluctuates like that).

COVID-19 occurred substantially from November 2019, and so the 2018-2019 flu low occurred mostly before COVID-19 was a 'thing'.

Number of influenza deaths in the United States from 2011 to 2024

(The later flu low of the 2021-2022 season is believed to be a combinatory result of the pre-existing low flu infection rate leading to fewer infectious hosts, the lockdowns, quarrantine, the masking, the social distancing and emphasis on sanitization all enacted in that time-frame - That's the thing, if the numbers of hosts are small, then all those things are very effective, but if you let things get out of control, you have less effectiveness - which is exactly what happened in the USA with COVID-19. While other countries brought COVID-19 under control, while their host numbers were low, the USA, and some other countries, were incubating it massively, and spreading it worldwide).

Also, the different diseases can be separately identified by their genomic sequence and early in the pandemic, the CDC standard for tests for COVID-19 were changed to also identify the family of virus (differentiating several strains of flu as well as SARS-CoV-2 and its early strains.

At the same time, the abundances both of viruses, and of excreted antigens to the various viruses, in watewater in cities across the USA was being measured too.

The determination of the specific disease was never 'a guess' based solely on symptoms (which were similar).

... Also, during the 1918 flu pandemic (which originated in Kansas, USA, so it's not the "Spanish Flu"), there were influential Americans who made claims that;

* smoking and bleaches could 'cure' that flu too.
* masks were ineffective.
* that the 1918 flu was 'not even real'.

The result was that the 1918 'AmericanFlu' spread around the world faster and worse than it might have, had people taken the more sensible recommendations of medical, academic and scientific associations:

As the 1918 Flu Emerged, Cover-Up and Denial Helped It Spread

It seems that some people never learn.