27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
01-19-2026, 10:31 AM
This post was last modified: 01-19-2026, 10:32 AM by WallFlowerActive.
(01-19-2026, 10:18 AM)quintessentone Wrote: It appears that this is just another deflection from releasing the Epstein Files and from Trump.
Unfortunately there are pictures of Clinton involved with Epstein activities and persons. Where Clinton will probably be held in contempt.
So. If this is about the victims. There is very real outrage at Clinton’s behavior. Why not from the usual propaganda pushers. Clinton knows more than he is letting on. Why else ignore a deposition where Clinton has first hand accounts of Epstein, Epstein’s workings, and Epstein flights. Why avoid any questioning that might help the victims of Epstein.
Where Congress can ask a living person and not rely on files. You think Bill would be eager to help in anyway.
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(01-19-2026, 10:31 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Don't you know? We can't collect new evidence, testimony, investigate further, or take any action at all until ALL THE FILES ARE RELEASED to an impossible standard of moving goalposts that will possibly never be achieved, but darn it we have to keep on trying and trying until everyone realizes HOW EVIL TRUMP REALLY IS!
 It was just so damn funny. I just got through saying that the reason this thread isn't as popular as the other Epstein threads is because it's not about Trump and that's all people care about. And ... BAM ... they proved me right!
Can't go after anyone else but Trump. Can't talk about anyone else but Trump. Otherwise it's a 'deflection' from Trump.
57 |
10,164 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(01-19-2026, 10:31 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Unfortunately there are pictures of Clinton involved with Epstein activities and persons. Where Clinton will probably be held in contempt.
So. If this is about the victims. There is very real outrage at Clinton’s behavior. Why not from the usual propaganda pushers. Clinton knows more than he is letting on. Why else ignore a deposition where Clinton has first hand accounts of Epstein, Epstein’s workings, and Epstein flights. Why avoid any questioning that might help the victims of Epstein.
Where Congress can ask a living person and not rely on files. You think Bill would be eager to help in anyway.
It's political theatre between both parties to be held behind closed doors - judge, jury, executioner. The same applies here. As I said, all named perps should be brought before a public and televised government bipartisan panel with the survivors/their lawyers there for on the spot counterarguments/further or deeper questioning.
--------
"This came up during today’s proceedings, when Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin explained that the bipartisan panel “took the significant step” of issuing subpoenas to McCarthy, Jordan, Perry, and Biggs, “based on the volume of information particular members possessed about one or more parts of President Trump’s plan to overturn the 2020 election.”
The Maryland congressman added, “None of the subpoenaed members complied, and we are now referring four members of Congress for appropriate sanction by the House Ethics Committee for failure to comply with lawful subpoenas.”"
Jan. 6 panel refers four House Republicans to Ethics Committee
"The only journey is the one within."
27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
01-19-2026, 10:46 AM
This post was last modified: 01-19-2026, 10:50 AM by WallFlowerActive.
(01-19-2026, 10:35 AM)quintessentone Wrote: It's political theatre
I’ve been told the law passed by the Senate and Congress and signed into law by Trump was about the victims.
There is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Bill Clinton had tires to Epstein, the workings of Epstein, and the fights provided by Epstein. This is a great opportunity for Bill Clinton to give testimony from his first hand accounts that could actually help the Epstein victims out. Why would any person pass up a chance to help out the victims of Epstein in anyway, bypass the need to rely on documents.
57 |
10,164 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(01-19-2026, 10:46 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: I’ve been told the law passed by the Senate and Congress and signed into law by Trump was about the victims.
There is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Bill Clinton had tires to Epstein, the workings of Epstein, and the fights provided by Epstein. This is a great opportunity for Bill Clinton to give testimony from his first hand accounts that could actually help the Epstein victims out. Why would any person pass up a chance to help out the victims of Epstein in anyway, bypass the need to rely on documents.
There is evidence and Epstein survivor testimony linking Trump to Epstein, financial records, many flights on the Lolita Express etc. If that is your basis for questioning someone, then Trump should be the first to be questioned.
"The only journey is the one within."
27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
01-19-2026, 10:54 AM
This post was last modified: 01-19-2026, 10:55 AM by WallFlowerActive.
(01-19-2026, 10:52 AM)quintessentone Wrote: There is evidence and Epstein survivor testimony linking Trump to Epstein, financial records, many flights on the Lolita Express etc. If that is your basis for questioning someone, then Trump should be the first to be questioned.
Same for Clinton in spades. So why would Clinton not provide his deposition and risk being held in contempt. Should be about Clinton providing any information that could help the victims, right.
The topic of the thread.. “Clintons Defy Epstein Subpoena”
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(01-19-2026, 10:52 AM)quintessentone Wrote: There is evidence and Epstein survivor testimony linking Trump to Epstein, financial records, many flights on the Lolita Express etc. If that is your basis for questioning someone, then Trump should be the first to be questioned.
And they continue to prove me right.
THIS THREAD is about Bill and Hillary Clinton.
It's not about Trump.
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(01-19-2026, 10:46 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Why would any person pass up a chance to help out the victims of Epstein in anyway, bypass the need to rely on documents.
![[Image: ae54238615e1782a302982b1544da1be.webp]](https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/ae54238615e1782a302982b1544da1be.webp)
57 |
10,164 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
01-19-2026, 10:56 AM
This post was last modified: 01-19-2026, 10:57 AM by quintessentone.
(01-19-2026, 10:54 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Same for Clinton in spades. So why would Clinton not provide his deposition and risk being held in contempt. Should be about Clinton providing any information that could help the victims, right.
The topic of the thread.. “Clintons Defy Epstein Subpoena”
Topic of this thread why defy a subpoena. I am expanding on why someone would defy a subpoena and gave you a source where Republican politicians defied subpoea, why?, because it is political theatre and another deflection to protect pedophiles for whom Trump is protecting.
"The only journey is the one within."
27 |
2,056 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
Quote:Werewolves of London
Song by Warren Zevon ‧ 1978
He's the hairy-handed gent who ran amok in Kent
Lately he's been overheard in Mayfair
You better stay away from him, he'll rip your lungs out, Jim
Huh, I'd like to meet his tailor
Ah-hoo, werewolves of London
Ah-hoo
Ah-hoo, werewolves of London
Ah-hoo
Well, I saw Lon Chaney walkin' with the Queen
Doin' the werewolves of London
I saw Lon Chaney Jr. walkin' with the Queen, uh
Doin' the werewolves of London
I saw a werewolf drinkin' a piña colada at Trader Vic's
And his hair was perfect
Ah-hoo, werewolves of London
Huh, draw blood
Ah-hoo, werewolves of London
|
