Circles

[Sirius]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivariate_statistics

Multivariate statistics is a subdivision of statistics encompassing
 the simultaneous observation and analysis of more than one outcome variable, i.e.
multivariate random variables

Multivariate statistics concerns understanding the different aims and
 background of each of the different forms of
multivariate analysis, and how they relate to each other

The practical application of
multivariate statistics to a particular problem
 may involve several types of univariate and
multivariate analyses in order to understand the
 relationships between variables and
their relevance to the problem being studied





Data analysis is one of the most useful tools when one tries to understand the vast amount of information presented to them and synthesise evidence from it. There are usually multiple factors influencing a phenomenon.

https://s4be.cochrane.org/blog/2021/09/0...-overview/

[Sirius]

[UltraBudgie]

SWQW: https://ia802300.us.archive.org/10/items...20Wars.pdf

Operations Research: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operations_research

[Sirius]

https://archive.org/details/astronomicum...9/mode/2up



a hawk dropped a maimed dove

the candle moved on it's own, wasn't expecting that

the necromancer seems upset about something

the exorcist and the necromancer employs the same tricks

suspicious

found some good art

[Sirius]

A dragon computer!

38 full page text illustrations, 22 of them with volvelles (moving discs), many also with centrally attached silk threads. Volvelles are foundon the recto of leaves B3, C1, C3, D1, D3, E1, E2, E4, F2, F3, F4, chi1, G4, k3, k4, L1, L2, L3, L4, M1 and M3 and the verso of leaf G3. Additionally, a large number of smaller text illustrations are present




Pretty



Squares



Comets



under the moon

Igor! Igor!  It's incomprehensible, it appears to be some kind of German. Call Hanz and tell him to start the tesla tower

Scaramouche, the fandango, Galileo Galilei, Figaro, and Beelzebub, with cries of "Bismillah! We will not let you go!", as rival factions fight over his soul, some wishing to "let go" and "spare him his life from this monstrosity", with others sending him "thunderbolts and lightning – very, very frightening

[Sirius]

[Sirius]

.

.

.

.

[Sirius]

and since it's Friday
.


.

.

.

[Sirius]

urgh Goëtia again, one never escapes

the candles doesn't want to burn today, dark visions, war, Azâzêl, Samael 




Asmodeus haunting nuns, poisoners, assassins, Astaroth is always lurking about

promises of justice and law in the shadows

the pigeon survived the night, the worms has enough fruit to eat it appears, a cat chased it away

all the fruit trees are budding together, the apple tree, the fig tree and the grapevine. spring coming early, hopefully a good omen

a discussion on words and meaning, disaster, "retarred". the lizard brings wisdom once again. I wonder about these things myself , I have been surrounded by the disabled and autistic my whole life, some even call me retarred. The curse is on the parents seven fold and anyone that doesn't look after the vulnerable, the disabled, children, virgins ,mothers, and crones. Rivers of blood will flow if woman are treated as whores

started reading Enoch

LIV. 7.-LV 2. Noachic Fragment on the first World Judgement.

7. 'And in those days shall punishment come from the Lord of Spirits, and he will open all the chambers of waters which are above the heavens, and of the fountains which are beneath the earth.

8. And all the waters shall be joined with the waters: that which is above the heavens is the masculine, and the water which is beneath the earth is the feminine.

10. And when they have recognized their unrighteousness which they have wrought on the earth, then by these shall they perish.

CHAPTER LV. 1.
And after that the Head of Days repented and said: 'In vain have I destroyed all who dwell on the earth.'

2. And He sware by His great name: 'Henceforth I will not do so to all who dwell on the earth, and I will set a sign in the heaven: and this shall be a pledge of good faith between Me and them for ever, so long as heaven is above the earth. And this is in accordance with My command.' 

LV. 3-LVI. 4. Final Judgement of Azâzêl, the Watchers and their children.
3. When I have desired to take hold of them by the hand of the angels on the day of tribulation and pain because of this, I will cause My chastisement and My wrath to abide upon them, saith God, the Lord of Spirits.
4. Ye †mighty kings† who dwell on the earth, ye shall have to behold Mine Elect One, how he sits on the throne of glory and judges Azâzêl, and all his associates, and all his hosts in the name of the Lord of Spirits.'

We study the Apocalypses to learn how our spiritual ancestors hoped again that God would make all right in the end; and that we, their children, are here today studying them is an indication that their hope was not wholly unfounded."

*Hope is, indeed, the main underlying motive-power which prompted the writers of the Apocalypses.

And this hope is the more intensive and ardent in that it shines forth from a background which is dark with despair; for the Apocalyptists despaired of the world in which they lived, a world in which the godly were of no account, while the wicked seemed too often triumphant and prosperous.

With evil everywhere around, the Apocalyptists saw no hope for the world as it was; for such a world there was no remedy, only destruction; if the good were ever to triumph it must be in a new world.

Another thing which the reader of the Apocalyptic Literature must be prepared for is the frequent inconsistency of thought to be found there, together with variableness of teaching often involving contradiction.

1 Enoch v. 4: "But ye--ye have not been steadfast, nor done the commandments of the Lord, But ye have turned away, and have spoken proud and hard words With your impure mouths against His greatness, O ye hard-hearted, ye shall find no peace."

And again, in xcix. 2:
"Woe to them that pervert the words of uprightness, And transgress the eternal Law."

We do not find in this Literature that insistence on the literal carrying-out of the minutest precepts of the Law which was characteristic of Pharisaism.

Veneration for the Law is whole-hearted;

it is the real guide of life;

punishment awaits those who ignore its guidance;

but the Pharisaic interpretation of the Law and its requirements is alien to the spirit of the Apocalyptists.

[Sirius]

An insiders view that comes in big and hard and then goes into bragging about money and asking for investors and then goes on to explain why disclosure should be controlled and all through the books and series they made I'm sure.

Nothing suspect here.

This is hilarious.

 Make money like rockstars. wtf idk, incomprehensible bullshit. write another book

"You have social, financial,  psychological, economic, philosophical impacts 
that you have to prepare for and plan for and,  this has always been drummed into the back of 
my head."

Who? Who? Who? ahahahahahahaha



Well, there's been a half a million people 
who've had an abduction experience or claim  they've had an abduction experience. They're 
either all hallucinating this experience,  but they're hallucinating it with the same 
variables each time, or it's real, and they  are being abducted.
Keep watching to learn more.  Book 4 in the New Thinking Allowed 
dialogue series, Charles T. Tart,   Seventy Years of Exploring
Consciousness and Parapsychology,   now available on Amazon.
New Thinking Allowed is   presented by the California Institute 
for Human Science, a fully accredited  university offering distant learning graduate 
degrees that focus on mind, body, and spirit,  the topics that we cover here. We are particularly 
excited to announce new degrees emphasizing  parapsychology and the paranormal. 
Visit their website at cihs.edu.  You can now download all eight copies of the 
New Thinking Allowed magazine for free or  order beautiful printed copies. 
Go to newthinkingallowed.org.  Thinking Allowed. Conversations on the 
leading edge of knowledge and discovery with  psychologist Jeffrey Mishlove.  Hello and welcome. I'm Jeffrey Mishlove. Our 
topic today is an insider's perspective on  UFO-UAP disclosure, and my guest, Jim Semivan, 
is an insider in two different ways. He is  co-founder and vice president of operations 
of To The Stars Incorporated, an organization  dedicated to media awareness 
of UFO-UAP phenomenology.  Jim retired in 2007 after a 25-year career 
in the Central Intelligence Agency's National  Clandestine Service. At 
the time of his retirement,   he was a member of the CIA's Senior Intelligence
Service. He served multiple overseas and domestic   tours, along with senior management positions
at the CIA headquarters. He is the recipient   of the agency's Career Intelligence Medal.
It was during this period that he became involved   in exploring UFO-related phenomena, prompted
to do so by his own personal experiences.  Jim is based in the East Coast and now 
I'll switch over to the internet video.  Welcome, Jim. It is a pleasure to be with you. 
Well, thank you very much for having me, Jeffrey.  I know I'm going to enjoy this conversation. 
Well, I'm going to enjoy it too and I'm sure our  viewers will enjoy it. Let me preface things 
by saying to the viewers who have heard the  introduction, I made a mistake. I said that 
you are an insider with regard to UFO-UAP  in two different ways, thinking about your 
work in the CIA and your personal experiences.  However, on reflection, I think it's more than 
two because you've been engaged in both research  through To the Stars Academy and also media 
projects. So you're an insider in at least  four different ways, maybe a fifth way as an 
informal consultant to some of the activity  that's taking place right now with the government. 
So you're an insider in at least, now that I'm  counting, five different ways. Well, yeah, I don't 
know if I would classify myself as an insider.  I happen to know quite a few of the people, 
what we would refer to as the heavyweights,  as with you, who are involved in this particular 
topic. I am not, however, I should say right up  front, involved or was I ever involved in the 
legacy program, nor am I involved in any CIA  program revolving UAP, nor was I ever involved. 
All my knowledge about current events came within  a 2014 timeframe. Although I've been studying 
this phenomenon for well over 40 years,  I'm not a researcher by any stretch, nor am 
I a scientist. I'm a student of the topic,  probably the best way to describe myself. To 
be clear, you've never had a decision-making  role within the government 
involving UFOs. Involving   UAP or the phenomenon? No, absolutely not.
I was in the senior ranks of the government,   but I dealt with things that were all CIA related.
And so, I had a marvelous career. I enjoyed   it immensely. I was sort of sad when I left,
but at the same time, I knew it was time to go.   But I stayed with it as an independent contractor
for 12 years and enjoyed that as much as   I did my career.
So, I think it's   fair to say that you have a good understanding of
the inside workings of the intelligence community.  I worked across the intelligence community 
almost my whole career. Generally, when you're an  operations officer like I was, you work with the 
FBI, you work with the White House, you work with  other, you know, DIA, DOD, some of the 
military organizations, and you know,  you name the government organization, I had some 
kind of relationship with them through my 34 or  5 years with the government. So that our viewers 
understand, you've also had personal experiences  and have known other people who have had direct 
personal experiences with this phenomenon.  Yes. You know, I had my own, my wife and I 
back in the early 90s, and it wasn't until,  oh, I don't know, I would say probably 
the late 90s, when I started nosing around  in my own organization and in other organizations, 
and it came to light that there were a lot of  people who've had these types of experiences. 
So we discussed it in an unofficial way.  Now, I wasn't part of, you know, Jacques 
Vallée's Invisible College at that time,  but I was a part of a very, very small localized 
group within the intelligence community, and it  was very, very informal where we talked about it 
in general, wondering, you know, what it was all  about. But we knew it was an extraordinarily 
strange topic, and there wasn't any place  we can refer ourselves to. There wasn't a UFO 
desk, so to speak, that we knew of, that I knew  of at the time. I didn't. Now I do, but I didn't 
then, so. There are things that you do know from  having been privy to information that you cannot 
talk about. When you join any intelligence  organization, you know, when you become 
indoctrinated, so to speak, you sign, you know,  they call them non-disclosure agreements, but 
really it's a lot more than that. I mean, it's  a vow and a promise that you make never to reveal 
classified information for whatever reason. So  it's something that, you know, you, I mean, it's 
just a standard rule that we all abide by. I mean,  Lou Elizondo abides by this as Chris Mellon, 
myself, Hal, you know, Puthoff, you know, all  these people, John Alexander, Kit Green. I 
mean, we take it very, very seriously. And when,  even when we're together, we also, we also 
recognize the fact that there is something  called need-to-know. So you, we may all have 
the same clearances, you know, top secret,  um, Special Compartmented 
Information, um, TK.. Talon   Keyhole, you speak, that's a satellite system
where information sometimes come from, that's top   secret, but there are different silos of top
secret information. So their silo might   be different than my silo, but 
unless they have a need to know  my silo, then we don't discuss things. So it's, 
it's interesting to watch us together because  sometimes there's a dance going on and, you know, 
what do they know? Are they read into the same  things I'm read into? And I remember how, you 
know, talking to me about things that he was  allowed to read me into and Lou Elizondo same 
way. And they were able to share with me things.  And that was sort of my initiation into the more 
classified realm of phenomenology, not so much  UAP, but UAP was part of it, but it was really the 
phenomenology surrounding it and the veracity of  it. And, um, and it sort of alters your worldview.   Uh, and, and you know, there's probably
better than anyone. Well, you mentioned   Hal Puthoff and of course he's 
a very important person in my  life. He's one of the founders really of the 
discipline of remote viewing and at the same  time deeply engaged in the study of UFOs and 
UAP. So there's an overlap clearly between the  world of parapsychology and the world of ufology. 
And I, I gather that amongst your colleagues and  in your own experience, that is well recognized. 
Oh, I think without question, I think, I mean,  you know, we're, I think a lot of people are 
very concerned nowadays about whether there's..  it's a possibility to have a unified theory of 
psychic phenomenon. Um, you know, how do you,  if there's 20, I think there's 25, 26 types of 
psychic phenomenon, you know, clairvoyance, ESP,  you can go down the list and then you 
have UAP, you have near death experiences,  uh, poltergeist activity, parapsychology 
in general, you know, past lives.  There's somehow, I think everybody realizes 
they're somehow connected, but we, we don't,  we know the dots. We think we know some of the 
dots, but we don't know if they're connected or  how they're connected, but it certainly seems 
that they are connected in some way. And that  all points to higher dimensional reality 
and, uh, the fact that we don't die. Uh,  we just don't, we just move on to another area, 
another plane, uh, you know, whether you want to  call it hyperspace, heaven, uh, you know, it's, 
it's just, I'm, I'm totally convinced of that.  It's, you know, I don't have very many beliefs, 
but that's one of them that, uh, I can't shake  that. I.. you know, my life, my experiences in 
my life, I think you mentioned it once in the  paper you wrote on, on, uh, near death experience 
where you won the award from the Bigelow Institute  and you said it, you said your experience was 
as real to you as anything else that you've  experienced. And I have to really repeat that and 
say, yes, mine was the same way. It was as real  as me chatting with you and as real to me having 
conversations with my friends on a daily basis.  It's that real. Yes. Viewers of this channel 
will be familiar with Chris Bledsoe who's been  interviewed many times on this channel. And your 
name came up during those interviews because  Chris felt that he owed a debt to you. I, I 
don't know if he put it quite that way, but  it was as if you rescued him and his family 
by acknowledging the reality of his very  exotic experiences with orbs that appeared to 
be inhabited by a being that he calls the lady.  Can you talk about your encounter with Bledsoe? I 
met Chris through a fellow named Larry Fraschella  out in Pennsylvania. And Larry was a.. he's 
a wonderful guy. He and his brother, David,  and they were basically looking after Chris for 
a while and helping him out if they could. And  Larry and I got together on a completely different 
topic and Larry brought us together in New York  City. Chris, I think two of 
his sons and his wife, Yvonne,   lovely, lovely lady, and my wife and myself.
And, and it was there that I was able to chat   with Chris and the family and let them know and
know in no uncertain terms that Chris, that what   Chris experienced was, was indeed true. And that,
you know, if anything, he needed support and, and   from not only from his family, but he needed it
from his community and from other people. And this   is one of the problems that happen with people
that have these very dramatic experiences.   There isn't any place to go 
and everything you say sounds  completely, you know, off the mark. And it's 
absurd, actually, some of the things you say.  And when he had explained to me what had happened 
to him, I mean, it was a classic experience,  most likely abduction in his case, 
where he had all these different  variables associated with abduction happen to him, 
and not only to him, but also to his son and to  the two other people that were with him. So his 
story, as far as I'm concerned, has always been  the same, it's never really changed. 
And I felt so sorry for him,   because if you know Chris, you know
he's one of the loveliest people alive,   and he doesn't have a mean 
bone in his body, and he's very  sincere and comes from a very interesting 
background. So I then went to his home after that,  and he invited me down and 
chatted with his children and   some of the neighbors and friends of the
children, and again, letting them know,   please, you know, take this man 
seriously. And because I can  tell you, I had a similar experience, and 
I'm not anybody's fool, and I also know  from what I've been told 
and what I've experienced,   that this is actually very, very real,
but we can't explain it. And so I   think that helped Chris a little 
bit, and I was happy to do so.  He has a wonderful family. I just.. really, 
really salt of the earth. So it was a very, very..  I was.. I count him as a very good friend of mine. 
So I don't agree with him on some of the aspects  of what he talks about, but that's perfectly 
normal. You know, his experience, he experiences  his experience in his way, and he interprets it 
the way he wants to interpret it, or how he feels  about it, what's true and what's not true. So 
you can't discount that, and I give him all the  credit in the world for that. I don't know if the 
conclusions he came to or something that I would  come to. I have a more of a cautious approach to 
this than I think he does, but other than that,  we both have the same belief 
that, yes, indeed, this did occur.  We should talk at least briefly 
for our viewers and let them know   about your work with To The Stars
Incorporated. Yes, To The Stars.   It's a fascinating company. It 
started around 2015, maybe 2016,  I think. I had met Tom DeLonge. I had been called 
by a friend of ours. I won't name them, but  asking me if I had read Sekret Machines, it was 
a book that Tom had published with A.J. Hartley,  was a fiction book. I said no, and I said, 
I don't even know who Mr. DeLonge is.  They said, well, you should read the book, and 
then you should listen to an interview he had  with George Knapp on Coast to Coast AM. So I 
listened to the interview first, then I bought  the book, and then I realized that Mr. DeLonge 
was talking about things that had a... I got to be  careful here. There are some things in the book 
I think were reasonably accurate as a reflection  of maybe what was going on in the government. So 
I knew he had advisors, and he had talked about  the 10 advisors that he had. So it was an 
informal thing where we contacted him and  asked to meet him to determine perhaps there 
might have been some leak of some classified  information. So I flew out there and met with 
Tom, and we had a wonderful dinner in a hotel  in Encinitas where he lives, and it became very 
apparent to me, two things became very apparent.  One, this man is very well-read and very 
knowledgeable on this topic, and number two,  there really wasn't a leak of any information 
at all. I guess I'll add a third one. Yeah,  he did have advisors because the way he spoke with 
me, clearly he knew.. he was able to put things  together that people were telling him. Essentially 
what he wanted to do was he had met everybody  through I think Lockheed Martin, Skunk Works, and 
that's how it all started, and people introduced  him to people. It turned out after the Russian 
hack of Hillary Clinton's emails, it came out  that yes indeed he was in touch with Podesta 
and General McCaslin. He was former head of  United States Air Force R&D, and I won't name 
the third one, and Tom refuses to tell me  who the other ones are, and I don't ask. Although 
I do know, I have found out who two of them were,  and they were very senior intelligence community 
officials. He still won't acknowledge it,  and he knows how to keep a secret. It's what I 
love about him, or confidence I should say in  this particular case, because I don't think 
anybody was telling him any secrets, but he was  able to put two and two together, and he came 
up with this wonderful story of secret machines.  Anyway, we were chatting, and he invited 
me to lunch, and I told him, oh by the way,  there's some other people down here that would 
like to meet you, and it was Hal. I won't name  the other ones because they don't want to be 
named, and two other luminaries I might add, and  he invited us all, Tom invited us all to join an 
organization he wanted to start, and he had a name  for it, To the Stars, and we all 
declined, and then he said why,   and then I think Hal and I explained
to him, look, we're more interested in the R&D   aspect of this, and the reason why we got involved
with this in the beginning was to figure out a way   to bring more information out on this particular
topic without bringing in the government. In other   words, the government doesn't own this topic,
and we don't want to get into classified material.   We just want to get this out. It's been all over
the world. It shows itself all over the world. The   military and the intelligence community doesn't
control this. It can't control this. It's too big,   so we want to devote time to researching it and
find out what it was privately and publicly,   so he said, well, how would you want to do this?
Let's start a company, and so I sketched out   on a cocktail napkin what it should look like.
We wanted to do entertainment because I thought   it was a really good way to educate people about
this in an elevated way, a little more   sophisticated way than you 
would get from Hollywood,  and then we wanted to have some kind of an R&D 
focus, and he said fine, and then we discussed,  he just said done, and so Hal and I said, 
well, yeah, why not, let's do this, and  we put some things in there. We wanted it to be 
a non-profit at first, but then we realized that  wasn't going to work for all kinds of business 
reasons, so eventually we made it into a public  benefit corporation, and we were going pretty 
well. We hired Lou Elizondo, which was a feat,  and then Steve Justice from the Skunk Works came 
on board, which is another one, a brilliant man,  a brilliant man, and then Chris Mellon 
came on board, and then we had Gary Nolan,  and then our board of advisors, very 
distinguished board of advisors,  
but what happened was we thought that we 
would be able to collect enough money from  small

investors. We wanted it to be a real public benefit corporation where small

investors would  come in and donate money, and then we would 

do the R&D, but we thought maybe we can do 15,  20 million. We barely got a million dollars out 
of this, and if you have a company you know,  particularly if you have eight or 10 employees, 
I don't get paid, by the way, neither does Tom  or anybody else, but we do have people that do 
get paid that run the company, but in 2020, 2021,  COVID hit, everything collapsed, so we decided at 
the time to, we didn't want to turn the company  off essentially, so we decided 

let's focus on

entertainment   until we get our feet back underground, get some more

investors in, then we will go back   and we have all these R&D projects on the shelf

ready to roll, all ready to roll, so that's   where we are now. We have about a dozen projects
with Hollywood and with streaming services. We,   Legendary Pictures bought Sekret Machines,
the fiction series, we have a project on Tubi,   it's an animated series, Brendan Fraser,
Sarah Michelle Geller going to be on it,   Josh Gad I think has signed up,
we sold a new project to Sony, we sold one to   Netflix, Paramount bought one, so they're all
in different stages of development,   

so we're hoping we can attract 

larger

investors

to come in and  that's where we are at the moment.

We're very, 
very optimistic that something is going to happen  soon. The main purpose for our conversation, 
of course, is to talk about the disclosure  process from your perspective. I do think you 
have a unique perspective, different, for example,  than Danny Sheehan, who has been on this channel 
many times, who is a very strong advocate for  disclosure and I think if we were to talk to 
Danny, he's not here so I can't be certain,  but I think he would say full speed ahead 
and I know you have many reservations.  I never met Danny Sheehan, but he's a wonderful 
guy and I've listened to him before, I've seen  him on podcasts and he makes, you know, he's a 
very talented attorney and he makes really great  arguments and I don't have any, you know, 
problems with what he's saying except,  you know, let me start again here. Most of my 
friends are for disclosure. I'm for disclosure,  but it has to be the type of disclosure that 
doesn't cause more issues than disclosure would  be worth and I know the Sol Foundation put out 
a wonderful paper written by Karl Nell on..  Colonel Nell and he's a wonderful guy, very, 
very bright guy and he wrote, I thought,  he did a wonderful presentation,

I think the 
last Sol Foundation on this idea of

limited  disclosure and catastrophic disclosure and why you'd want to go for

limited  disclosure. And I don't disagree with him on it. What I like to caution people about is  you can do.. if you do

limited disclosure,  then you really have to seriously look at  what that would mean and how you would 
control the narrative in a Civilization,  and I say Civilization, capital C, writ large, 
that is put together like our world civilization  is. I mean, we have so many different things 
to consider.

You have social, financial,  psychological, economic, philosophical impacts 
that you have to prepare for and plan for and,  this has always been drummed into the back of 
my head.

When I was in CIA,

I used to work on  operations,

big operations where we would run an 

operation to do something and when you would do  that

, you would have to look at it and say, okay, 
we're geared to anywhere from 80 to 100% success  rate.

If we can't get an 80 to 100% success rate 
on this, then probably it's not a good idea to do  it the way we're doing it and then we would also 
try to sit back and say,

what could go wrong? 

 What could possibly go wrong?





just relax, focus 10 and everything will be good  smoke a joint, it helps. some drops or gummies. mushrooms if you are having a hard time